Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 171–176 | Cite as

Recurrent bile duct stricture: causes and long-term results of surgical management

  • Biju Pottakkat
  • Sadiq S. Sikora
  • Ashok Kumar
  • Rajan Saxena
  • Vinay K. Kapoor
Original articles



The management of recurrent bile duct strictures is a challenge for surgeons. This study reports the experience of revision surgery in patients referred following the failure of primary repair, and compares the outcome with that in patients who underwent management of recurrent stricture following primary repair at our institution.


Over a period of 15 years, 300 patients with postcholecystectomy benign biliary stricture underwent surgical repair at our institution; 36 patients (12%) were referred after a failed primary repair.


In 25 (69%) patients, the primary repairs were done at peripheral hospitals. Twelve (33%) had had an early repair, at the time of cholecystectomy while 24 (67%) had a delayed repair at a later date; 83% and 67% of the patients who had undergone early and delayed repair, respectively, had not had a preoperative cholangiogram. Primary repairs performed were a bilioenteric anastomosis (22; 61%) or an end-to-end bile duct repair (14; 39%). Twenty-seven (75%) patients presented within 90 days after the primary repair, and the median interval to recurrent symptoms was 45 days (range, 1 day to 6.1 years). The median delay in referral after the development of symptoms of restricture was 175 days (range, 30 days to 22 years). Twenty-three (64%) patients had high strictures (Bismuth types III-V). All patients underwent a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. At a median follow-up of 37 months (range, 12–144 months), 33 of 35 evaluable patients (94%) with recurrent stricture had an excellent/good outcome compared to 223 of 242 evaluable patients (92%) who had had their primary repair at our institution. Ten (4%) patients had a poor result following primary repair at our center. There was a significant difference in the stricture repair-to-recurrence interval between those patients referred to us with recurrent strictures and those who failed after primary repair at our institution (median interval, 1.5 vs 20 months; P = 0.001)


Patients referred with recurrent strictures had had their primary repair at peripheral settings; the failures were technical, presenting early (median, 1.5 months) with recurrent symptoms, compared to findings in patients with recurrent strictures following primary repair at our center. The long-term outcome following the repair of the primary and the recurrent strictures was no different in our experience.

Key words

Bile duct stricture Bile duct injury Revision repair 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Deziel, DJ, Millikan, KW, Economou, SG, Doolas, A, Sung-Tao, Ko, Airan, MC 1993Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77 604 casesAm J Surg165914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frazee, RC, Roberts, JW, Symmonds, R, Snyder, SK, Hendricks, J, Smith, R,  et al. 1992What are the contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy?Am J Surg1644915PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zucker, KA, Bailey, RW, Gadacz, TR, Imbembo, AL 1991Laparoscopic guided cholecystectomyAm J Surg1613644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Richardson MC, Bell G, Fullarton GM. Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. Br J Surg 83:1356–60Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Russell, JC, Walsh, SJ, Mattie, AS, Lynch, JT 1996Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993. A state wide experienceArch Surg1313828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Southern Surgeons Club1991A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomiesN Engl J Med32410738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Roslyn, JJ, Binns, GS, Hughes, EFX, Kirkwood, KS, Zinner, MJ, Cates, JA 1993Open cholecystectomy — a contemporary analysis of 42 474 patientsAnn Surg21812937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilliland, TM, Traverso, LW 1990Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptomsSurg Gynecol Obstet1703944PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savader, SJ, Lillemoe, KD, Prescott, CA, Winick, AB, Venbrux, AC, Lund, GB,  et al. 1997Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries — a health and financial disasterAnn Surg22526873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pellegrini, CA, Thomas, MJ, Way, LW 1984Recurrent biliary stricture — pattern of recurrence and outcome of surgical therapyAm J Surg14717580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Millis, MJ, Tompkins, RK, Zinner, MJ, Longmire, WP, Roslyn, JJ 1992Management of bile duct strictures — an evolving strategyArch Surg127107784PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chapman, CW, Halevy, A, Blumgart, LH, Benjamin, IS 1995Post-cholecystectomy bile duct strictures — management and outcome in 130 patientsArch Surg130597604PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kozicki, I, Bielecki, I, Kawalski, A, Krolicki, L 1994Repeated reconstruction for recurrent benign bile duct strictureBr J Surg816779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaudhary, A, Chandra, A, Negi, SS, Sachdev, A 2002Reoperative surgery for post-cholecystectomy bile duct injuriesDig Surg19227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stewart, L, Way, LW 1995Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy — factors that influence the results of treatmentArch Surg13011238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lillemoe, KD, Melton, GB, Cameron, JL, Pitt, HA, Campbell, KA, Talamini, MA,  et al. 2000Postoperative bile duct strictures: management and outcome in the 1990sAnn Surg23243041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murr, MM, Gigot, JF, Nagorney, D, Nagorney, DM, Harmsen, WS, Ilstrup, DM,  et al. 1999Long-term results of biliary reconstruction after laparoscopic bile duct injuriesArch Surg13460410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bismuth, H 1982Postoperative stricture of the biliary tractBlumgart, LH eds. The biliary tract. Clinical surgery international, vol 5Churchill LivingstoneEdinburgh20918Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hepp, J 1985Hepaticojejunostomy using the left biliary trunk for iatrogenic biliary lesions: the French connectionWorld J Surg950711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McDonald, MI, Farnell, MB, Nagorney, DM, Ilstrup, DM, Kutch, JM 1995Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approachSurgery11858291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Windsor, JA, Pong, J 1998Laparoscopic biliary injury — more than a learning curve problemAust N Z J Surg681869PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bottger, T, Junginger, T 1991Long-term results after surgical treatment of iatrogenic injury of the bile ductsEur J Surg15747780PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raute, M, Podlech, P, Jaschke, W, Manegold, BC, Trede, M, Chir, B 1993Management of bile duct injuries and strictures following cholecystectomyWorld J Surg1755362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bergman, JJ, Brink, GR, Rauws, EA, Wit, L, Obertop, H, Huibregtse, K,  et al. 1996Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomyGut381417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schmidt, SC, Langrehr, JM, Hintze, RE, Neuhaus, P 2005Longterm results and risk factors influencing outcome of major bile duct injuries following cholecystectomyBr J Surg927682PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carroll, BJ, Birth, M, Philips, EH 1998Common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in litigationSurg Endosc123103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Woods, M, Traverso, L, Kozarek, R, Tsao, J, Rossi, RL, Gough, D,  et al. 1994Characteristics of biliary tract complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multi-institutional studyAm J Surg1672734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khalid, TR, Casillas, VJ, Montalvo, BM, Centeno, R, Levi, JU 2001Using MR cholangiopancreatography to evaluate iatrogenic bile duct injuryAJR Am J Roentgenol177134752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Choudary, A, Negi, SS, Puri, SK, Narang, P 2002Comparison of magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in the evaluation of bile duct strictures after cholecystectomyBr J Surg894336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tochi, A, Costa, G, Lepre, L, Liotta, G, Mazzoni, G, Sita, A 1996The long-term outcome of hepaticojejunostomy in the treatment of benign bile duct stricturesAnn Surg2241627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Myburgh, JA 1993The Hepp-Couinaud approach to strictures of the bile ductsAnn Surg21861520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lillemoe, KD, Martin, SA, Cameron, JL, Yeo, CJ, Talamini, MA, Kaushal, S,  et al. 1997Major bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy — follow up after combined surgical and radiologic managementAnn Surg22545971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mirza, DF, Narsimhan, KL, Neto, BHF, Mayer, AD, Mc Master, P, Buckels, JAC 1997Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: referral pattern and managementBr J Surg8478690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Johnson, SR, Koehler, A, Pennington, LK, Hanto, DW 2000Long-term results of surgical repair of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomySurgery12866877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Negi, SS, Sakhuja, P, Malhotra, V, Choudhary, A 2004Factors predicting advanced hepatic fibrosis in patients with post cholecystectomy bile duct stricturesArch Surg139299303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sikora, SS, Kumar, A, Das, NR, Sarkari, A, Saxena, R, Kapoor, VK 2001Laparoscopic bile duct injuries: spectrum at a tertiary care centreJ Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A11638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biju Pottakkat
    • 1
  • Sadiq S. Sikora
    • 1
  • Ashok Kumar
    • 1
  • Rajan Saxena
    • 1
  • Vinay K. Kapoor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical GastroenterologySanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesLucknow. UPIndia

Personalised recommendations