Advertisement

Constraining the pressure–temperature evolution and geodynamic setting of UHT granulites and migmatitic paragneisses of the Gruf Complex, Central Alps

  • Jeffrey Oalmann
  • Erik DuesterhoeftEmail author
  • Andreas Möller
  • Romain Bousquet
Original Paper

Abstract

Thermodynamic modeling of compositionally mapped microdomains and whole-rock compositions is used to constrain the pressure–temperature (P–T) evolution of sapphirine granulites and migmatitic paragneisses from the Gruf Complex of the Central Alps. The P–T paths and conditions estimated from granulite microdomains and whole-rock compositions are consistent with one another, indicating that the estimates from both types of compositions are accurate. The sapphirine granulites were heated to ultra-high temperature conditions of 900–1000 °C and 7.0–9.5 kbar as they were decompressed from ca. 800 °C and 9–12 kbar, resulting in garnet breakdown. In a subsequent step, nearly isothermal decompression led to the development of cordierite-bearing coronae and symplectites. By ca. 27 Ma, the sapphirine granulites had been exhumed to the midcrustal level of the migmatitic paragneisses, which were undergoing peak metamorphism at ca. 675–750 °C and 5–7 kbar. These results are consistent with a geodynamic model that invokes heat advection to the lower crust closely following the continental-subduction (ultra-high pressure) stage of the Alpine orogeny. The most plausible geodynamic model consistent with the results of this study is breakoff of a southward subducting lithospheric slab, resulting in asthenospheric mantle flow.

Keywords

UHT metamorphism Gruf complex Central Alps Thermodynamic modeling Charnockite Sapphirine granulite 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the American National Science Foundation under Grant no. EAR 0911633 to A. Möller. We would like to thank (A) Galli for guiding us in the field area, the Biavaschi family at Rifugio Brasca for their hospitality and logistical help, P.G. Lippert for field assistance, and C. Fischer (University of Potsdam) and W.C. Dickerson (University of Kansas) for preparing thin sections. P. Appel and (B) Mader (University of Kiel) and (C) Gunther and M. Konrad-Schmolke (University of Potsdam) assisted with the EPMA work. We are also grateful to A. Galli, V. Guevara, M. Caddick, and several others for fruitful discussions about the Gruf Complex. Sebastian Weber, Niko Froitzheim, and an anonymous colleague are thanked for their thoughtful and critical reviews.

Supplementary material

531_2019_1686_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (121 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 120 KB)
531_2019_1686_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (60 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 60 KB)
531_2019_1686_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx (34 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLSX 34 KB)
531_2019_1686_MOESM4_ESM.eps (1.9 mb)
Online Resource S4: The H2O content of samples and reaction textures were estimated using temperature versus mole fraction hydrogen (MH) diagrams. Pressure was fixed at 9 kbar for the granulite samples and textures therein (Fig. A1a–d) and 6 kbar for the paragneisses (Fig. A1e–f) based on the previously published P–T estimates of Galli et al. (2011) and Guevara and Caddick (2016). For all samples, MH values ranging from 0 (dry conditions) to 20 (H2O-saturated conditions) were used in the binary plots. For the garnet breakdown texture from leucogranulite GR11–39 (Fig. A1a), the observed peak assemblage consists of plagioclase + garnet + sapphirine + orthopyroxene + spinel + melt ± K-feldspar (red shaded fields in Fig. A1a). The presence of coexisting plagioclase, sapphirine, orthopyroxene, and spinel in the garnet-breakdown texture limits MH to less than 16. It is unclear whether K-feldspar was stable as a solid phase at peak conditions. Therefore, we used an MH value of 8 to calculate the P–T diagram (Fig. 8a). For the residual granulite Gruf100 (Fig. A1b), the observed peak assemblage (red-shaded field in Fig. A1b) comprises plagioclase + garnet + orthopyroxene + sapphirine + sillimanite + rutile + melt. The sillimanite-out reaction (purple line in Fig. A1b) is nearly vertical in the calculated diagram, indicating that the presence or absence of sillimanite is strongly affected by H2O content for this bulk composition. In this sample, the coexistence of sapphirine and sillimanite restricts MH to less than 11 (Fig. A1b). Therefore, we used an MH value of 4, which crosses the field of the observed peak assemblage, to calculate the P–T diagram for this sample. The field of the observed peak assemblage (garnet + orthopyroxene + sapphirine + biotite + melt) in residual granulite Br03-56-2 is stable over a wide range of MH values, ranging from 7 to 19 (Fig. A1c). The minerals that were stable at peak conditions (garnet, sapphirine, orthopyroxene) do not tightly constrain the H2O content. Therefore, we chose an MH value of 10, which intersects near the center of field of the observed peak assemblage (Fig. A1c). The observed assemblage in the monazite bearing microdomain (GRM-37) from residual granulite sample Br03-56-2 is stable over a narrow range of MH values, ranging from 3 to 5 (Fig. A1d). Assuming that neither free H2O nor melt was present at peak conditions in this microdomain, we used an MH value of 5 to calculate the P–T diagram (Fig. 8d). The stabilities of quartz and feldspars are not used to estimate the P–T conditions experienced by migmatitic paragneiss samples (see “Accuracy of P–T Estimates” above) and, thus, are not used to constrain the H2O contents of these samples. Therefore, the only constraint for H2O content in the muscovite-bearing paragneiss sample GR11–23 is the presence of muscovite and melt, which coexist at MH values ranging from 9 to > 20 (Fig. A1e). The presence of sillimanite and melt and absence of cordierite at peak conditions in the muscovite-free paragneiss sample GR11-25 indicate that MH was > 5.5 at peak conditions (Fig. A1f). We used an MH value of 15 to calculate the P–T diagrams (Fig. 9) for both paragneiss samples because this value intersects the field of the observed peak assemblage in sample GR11–23 and intersects fields that contain and lack free H2O for sample GR11–25 (red shaded fields in Fig. A1f). Fig. A1 Temperature versus mole fraction hydrogen (MH = 0.5 × MH2O) phase diagrams calculated at 9 kbar pressure for granulite microdomain and whole rock samples (a-d) and at 6 kbar pressure for migmatitic paragneiss samples (e–f). The red-shaded fields correspond to the observed peak assemblages, and the thick, dashed lines correspond to the MH values used to compute the P–T diagrams (Figs. 8, 9) (EPS 1932 KB)
531_2019_1686_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (2.3 mb)
Overview X-ray composition maps of the modeled microdomains of residual granulite sample GRM-37 and leucogranulite sample GR11-39 (PDF 2317 KB)

References

  1. Armstrong JT (1995) CITZAF-a package of correction programs for the quantitative electron microbeam X-ray-analysis of thick polished materials, thin-films, and particles. Microbeam Anal 4(3):177–200Google Scholar
  2. Becker H (1993) Garnet peridotite and eclogite Sm-Nd mineral ages from the Lepontine dome (Swiss Alps): new evidence for Eocene high-pressure metamorphism in the central Alps. Geology 21(7):599–602Google Scholar
  3. Beltrando M, Lister GS, Rosenbaum G, Richards S, Forster MA (2010) Recognizing episodic lithospheric thinning along a convergent plate margin: the example of the Early Oligocene Alps. Earth Sci Rev 103(3):81–98Google Scholar
  4. Berger A, Bousquet R (2008) Subduction-related metamorphism in the Alps: review of isotopic ages based on petrology and their geodynamic consequences. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 298(1):117–144Google Scholar
  5. Berger A, Rosenberg C, Schmid S (1996) Ascent, emplacement and exhumation of the Bergell pluton within the Southern Steep Belt of the Central Alps. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 76(3):357–382Google Scholar
  6. Berger A, Schmid SM, Engi M, Bousquet R, Wiederkehr M (2011) Mechanisms of mass and heat transport during Barrovian metamorphism: a discussion based on field evidence from the Central Alps (Switzerland/northern Italy). Tectonics 30:TC1007Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn T, Shimizu N, Bowring SA, Schoene B, Mahan KH (2012) Zirconium in rutile speedometry: new constraints on lower crustal cooling rates and residence temperatures. Earth Planet Sci Lett 317:231–240Google Scholar
  8. Bousquet R, Goffé B, Vidal O, Oberhänsli R, Patriat M (2002) The tectono-metamorphic history of the Valaisan domain from the Western to the Central Alps: new constraints on the evolution of the Alps. Geol Soc Am Bull 114(2):207–225Google Scholar
  9. Bousquet R, Oberhänsli R, Schmid SM et al (2012a) Metamorphic framework of the Alps, Commission for the Geological Map of the World, CCGM/CGMWGoogle Scholar
  10. Bousquet R, Schmid SM, Zeilinger G et al (2012b) Tectonic framework of the Alps, Commission for the Geological Map of the World, CCGM/CGMWGoogle Scholar
  11. Brouwer F, Burri T, Engi M, Berger A (2005) Eclogite relics in the Central Alps: PT- evolution, Lu-Hf ages, and implications for formation of tectonic mélange zones. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 85:147–174Google Scholar
  12. Brown M (2006) Duality of thermal regimes is the distinctive characteristic of plate tectonics since the Neoarchean. Geology 34(11):961–964Google Scholar
  13. Brown M (2007) Metamorphic conditions in orogenic belts: a record of secular change. Int Geol Rev 49(3):193–234Google Scholar
  14. Bucher-Nurminen K, Droop G (1983) The metamorphic evolution of garnet-cordierite-sillimanite-gneisses of the Gruf-Complex, Eastern Pennine Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 84:215–227Google Scholar
  15. Burri T, Berger A, Engi M (2005) Tertiary migmatites in the Central Alps: regional distribution, field relations, conditions of formation, and tectonic implications. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 85(2–3):215–232Google Scholar
  16. Carswell D, O’Brien P (1993) Thermobarometry and geotectonic significance of high-pressure granulites: examples from the Moldanubian Zone of the Bohemian Massif in Lower Austria. J Petrol 34(3):427–459Google Scholar
  17. Ciancaleoni L, Marquer D (2006) Syn-extension leucogranite deformation during convergence in the Eastern Central Alps: example of the Novate intrusion. Terra Nova 18(3):170–180Google Scholar
  18. Clark C, Fitzsimons IC, Healy D, Harley SL (2011) How does the continental crust get really hot? Elements 7(4):235–240Google Scholar
  19. Coggon R, Holland T (2002) Mixing properties of phengitic micas and revised garnet-phengite thermobarometers. J Metamorph Geol 20(7):683–696Google Scholar
  20. Collins W (2002) Hot orogens, tectonic switching, and creation of continental crust. Geology 30(6):535–538Google Scholar
  21. Davidson C, Rosenberg C, Schmid S (1996) Symmagmatic folding of the base of the Bergell pluton, Central Alps. Tectonophysics 265(3):213–238Google Scholar
  22. De Capitani C (1994) Gleichgewichts-phasendiagramme: theorie und software. Beiheft zur Deutschen Mineralogischen Gesellschaft 6:1–48Google Scholar
  23. De Capitani C, Petrakakis K (2010) The computation of equilibrium assemblage diagrams with Theriak/Domino software. Am Mineral 95(7):1006–1016Google Scholar
  24. Diener J, Powell R (2012) Revised activity—composition models for clinopyroxene and amphibole. J Metamorph Geol 30(2):131–142Google Scholar
  25. Dobrzhinetskaya L, Schweinehage R, Massonne HJ, Green H (2002) Silica precipitates in omphacite from eclogite at Alpe Arami, Switzerland: evidence of deep subduction. J Metamorph Geol 20(5):481–492Google Scholar
  26. Droop GTR, Bucher-Nurminen K (1984) Reaction textures and metamorphic evolution of sapphirine-bearing granulites from the Gruf Complex, Italian Central Alps. J Petrol 25(3):766–803Google Scholar
  27. Engi M, Berger A, Roselle GT (2001) Role of the tectonic accretion channel in collisional orogeny. Geology 29(12):1143–1146Google Scholar
  28. Fitzsimons ICW, Harley SL (1994) The influence of retrograde cation exchange on granulite PT estimates and a convergence technique for the recovery of peak metamorphic conditions. J Petrol 35(2):543–576Google Scholar
  29. Frey M, Ferreiro Mählmann R (1999) Alpine metamorphism of the Central Alps. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 79(1):135–154Google Scholar
  30. Galli A (2010) Tectonometamorphic evolution of the Gruf Complex (Swiss and Italian Central Alps). Dissertation, ETH ZürichGoogle Scholar
  31. Galli A, Le Bayon B, Schmidt MW et al (2011) Granulites and charnockites of the Gruf Complex: evidence for Permian ultra-high temperature metamorphism in the Central Alps. Lithos 124(1–2):17–45Google Scholar
  32. Galli A, Le Bayon B, Schmidt MW et al (2012) U–Pb zircon dating of the Gruf Complex: disclosing the late Variscan granulitic lower crust of Europe stranded in the Central Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 163:353–378Google Scholar
  33. Galli A, Le Bayon B, Schmidt MW, Burg J-P, Reusser E (2013) Tectonometamorphic history of the Gruf complex (Central Alps): exhumation of a granulite–migmatite complex with the Bergell pluton. Swiss J Geosci 106(1):33–62Google Scholar
  34. Gebauer D (1996) A P–T–t path for an (Ultra?-) high-pressure ultramafic/mafic rock-association and its felsic country-rocks based on SHRIMP-dating of magmatic and metamorphic zircon domains. In: Example: Alpe Arami (Central Swiss Alps), earth processes: reading the isotopic code. Geophys Monogr Ser AGU, Washington, DC, pp 307–329Google Scholar
  35. Goffé B, Bousquet R, Henry, Le Pichon X (2003) Effect of the chemical composition of the crust on the metamorphic evolution of orogenic wedges. J Metamorph Geol 21:123–141Google Scholar
  36. Gordon S et al (2012) The thermal structure of continental crust in active orogens: insight from Miocene eclogite and granulite xenoliths of the Pamir Mountains. J Metamorph Geol 30(4):413–434Google Scholar
  37. Guevara V, Caddick M (2016) Shooting at a moving target: phase equilibria modelling of high-temperature metamorphism. J Metamorph Geol 34:209–235Google Scholar
  38. Guillong M, Hametner K, Reusser E, Wilson SA, Günther D (2005) Preliminary characterisation of new glass reference materials (GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G and GSE-1G) by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm wavelengths. Geostand Geoanalyt Res 29(3):315–331Google Scholar
  39. Hacker BR, Gnos E, Ratschbacher L et al (2000) Hot and dry deep crustal xenoliths from Tibet. Science 287(5462):2463–2466Google Scholar
  40. Hamilton BM, Pattison DR (2010) Thermodynamic modelling of open-system behaviour for anatectic metapelites. In: GeoCanada 2010—working with the earthGoogle Scholar
  41. Handy MR, Schmid SM, Bousquet R, Kissling E, Bernoulli D (2010) Reconciling plate-tectonic reconstructions of Alpine Tethys with the geological–geophysical record of spreading and subduction in the Alps. Earth Sci Rev 102(3):121–158Google Scholar
  42. Harley SL (1998) On the occurrence and characterization of ultrahigh-temperature crustal metamorphism. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 138(1):81–107Google Scholar
  43. Harley SL (2008) Refining the P–T records of UHT crustal metamorphism. J Metamorph Geol 26(2):125–154Google Scholar
  44. Heinrich CA (1986) Eclogite facies regional metamorphism of hydrous mafic rocks in the Central Alpine Adula Nappe. J Petrol 27(1):123–154Google Scholar
  45. Hermann J, Rubatto D, Trommsdorff V (2006) Sub-solidus Oligocene zircon formation in garnet peridotite during fast decompression and fluid infiltration (Duria, Central Alps). Mineral Petrol 88(1):181–206Google Scholar
  46. Herwartz D, Münker C, Scherer EE, Nagel TJ, Pleuger J, Froitzheim N (2008) Lu-Hf garnet geochronology of eclogites from the Balma Unit (Pennine Alps): implications for Alpine paleotectonic reconstructions. In: Froitzheim N, Schmid SM (eds) Orogenic processes in the Alpine collision zone, Swiss journal of geosciences supplement, vol 3. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp S173–S189Google Scholar
  47. Holland TJB, Powell R (1998) An internally consistent thermodynamic data set for phases of petrological interest. J Metamorph Geol 16(3):309–343Google Scholar
  48. Holland TJB, Powell R (2003) Activity–composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multicomponent formulation. Contrib Mineral Petrol 145(4):492–501Google Scholar
  49. Jochum KP, Willbold M, Raczek I, Stoll B, Herwig K (2005) Chemical characterisation of the USGS reference glasses GSA-1G, GSC-1G, GSD-1G, GSE-1G, BCR-2G, BHVO-2G and BIR-1G Using EPMA, ID-TIMS, ID-ICP-MS and LA-ICP-MS. Geostand Geoanalyt Res 29(3):285–302Google Scholar
  50. Johnson D, Hooper P, Conrey R (1999) XRF analysis of rocks and minerals for major and trace elements on a single low dilution Li-tetraborate fused bead. In: Le Bas M (ed) Advances in X-ray analysis, pp 843–867Google Scholar
  51. Kelsey DE (2008) On ultrahigh-temperature crustal metamorphism. Gondwana Res 13(1):1–29Google Scholar
  52. Kelsey DE, Hand M (2015) On ultrahigh temperature crustal metamorphism: phase equilibria, trace element thermometry, bulk composition, heat sources, timescales and tectonic settings. Geosci Front 6(3):311–356Google Scholar
  53. Kelsey DE, White RW, Holland TJB, Powell R (2004) Calculated phase equilibria in K2O-FeO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O for sapphirine-quartz-bearing mineral assemblages. J Metamorph Geol 22(6):559–578Google Scholar
  54. Koblinger BM, Pattison DRM (2017) Crystallization of heterogeneous pelitic migmatites: insights from thermodynamic modelling. J Petrol 58:297–326Google Scholar
  55. Kooijman E, Smit M, Mezger K, Berndt J (2012) Trace element systematics in granulite facies rutile: implications for Zr geothermometry and provenance studies. J Metamorph Geol 30(4):397–412Google Scholar
  56. Krogh Ravna E, Terry MP (2004) Geothermobarometry of UHP and HP eclogites and schists—an evaluation of equilibria among garnet–clinopyroxene–kyanite–phengite–coesite/quartz. J Metamorph Geol 22(6):579–592Google Scholar
  57. Lanari P, Duesterhoeft E (2019) Modeling metamorphic rocks using equilibrium thermodynamics and internally consistent databases: past achievements, problems and perspectives. J Petrol 60(1):19–56Google Scholar
  58. Liati A, Gebauer D (2003) Geochronological constraints for the time of metamorphism in the Gruf Complex (Central Alps) and implications for the Adula-Cima Lunga nappe system. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 83:159–172Google Scholar
  59. Liati A, Gebauer D, Fanning M (2000) U-Pb SHRIMP dating of zircon from the Novate granite (Bergell, Central Alps): evidence for Oligocene-Miocene magmatism, Jurassic/Cretaceous continental rifting and opening of the Valais trough. Schweiz Mineral Petrogr Mitt 80(3):305–316Google Scholar
  60. Luvizotto G, Zack T, Meyer HP et al (2009) Rutile crystals as potential trace element and isotope mineral standards for microanalysis. Chem Geol 261(3):346–369Google Scholar
  61. Nicollet C, Bosse V, Spalla MI, Schiavi F (2018) Eocene ultra high temperature (UHT) metamorphism in the Gruf complex (Central Alps): constraints by LA-ICPMS zircon and monazite dating in petrographic context. J Geol Soc Lond 175(5):774–787Google Scholar
  62. Nievergelt P, Liniger M, Froitzheim N, Mählmann RF (1996) Early to mid Tertiary crustal extension in the Central Alps: the Turba Mylonite Zone (Eastern Switzerland). Tectonics 15(2):329–340Google Scholar
  63. O’Brien PJ (2008) Challenges in high-pressure granulite metamorphism in the era of pseudosections: reaction textures, compositional zoning and tectonic interpretation with examples from the Bohemian Massif. J Metamorph Geol 26(2):235–251Google Scholar
  64. Oalmann J (2017) Integrating in situ geochronology and metamorphic petrology: an example from the Gruf Complex, European Central Alps. Dissertation, The University of Kansas. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/26345
  65. Palin RM, Weller OM, Waters DJ, Dyck B (2016) Quantifying geological uncertainty in metamorphic phase equilibria modelling; a Monte Carlo assessment and implications for tectonic interpretations. Geosci Front 7(4):591–607.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.08.005 Google Scholar
  66. Paton C, Hellstrom J, Paul B, Woodhead J, Hergt J (2011) Iolite: freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. J Anal At Spectrom 26(12):2508–2518Google Scholar
  67. Pattison DRM, Chacko T, Farquhar J, McFarlane CR (2003) Temperatures of granulite-facies metamorphism: constraints from experimental phase equilibria and thermobarometry corrected for retrograde exchange. J Petrol 44(5):867–900Google Scholar
  68. Pfiffner OA (2016) Basement-involved thin-skinned and thick-skinned tectonics in the Alps. Geol Mag 153(5/6):1085–1109Google Scholar
  69. Pownall JM, Hall R, Armstrong RA, Forster MA (2014) Earth’s youngest known ultrahigh-temperature granulites discovered on Seram, eastern Indonesia. Geology 42(4):279–282Google Scholar
  70. Rosenberg C (2004) Shear zones and magma ascent: a model based on a review of the Tertiary magmatism in the Alps. Tectonics 23(TC3002):1–21Google Scholar
  71. Rubatto D, Hermann J, Berger A, Engi M (2009) Protracted fluid-induced melting during Barrovian metamorphism in the Central Alps. Contrib Mineral Petrol 158(6):703–722Google Scholar
  72. Samperton KM, Schoene B, Cottle JM et al (2015) Magma emplacement, differentiation and cooling in the middle crust: integrated zircon geochronological–geochemical constraints from the Bergell Intrusion, Central Alps. Chem Geol 417:322–340Google Scholar
  73. Sandmann S, Nagel TJ, Herwartz D, Fonseca ROC, Kurzawski RM, Münker C, Froitzheim N (2014) Lu-Hf garnet systematics of a polymetamorphic basement unit: new evidence for coherent exhumation of the Adula Nappe (Central Alps) from eclogite-facies conditions. Contrib Mineral Petrol 168:1075Google Scholar
  74. Schefer S (2005) Metamorphose und Deformation im Gruf-Komplex, Val Codera, Italien. Diploma Thesis, University of BaselGoogle Scholar
  75. Schmid SM, Pfiffner O-A, Froitzheim N, Schönborn G, Kissling E (1996) Geophysical-geological transect and tectonic evolution of the Swiss–Italian Alps. Tectonics 15(5):1036–1064Google Scholar
  76. Schmitz S, Möller A, Wilke M, Malzer W, Kanngiesser B, Bousquet R, Berger A, Schefer S (2009) Chemical U-Th-Pb dating of monazite by 3D-Micro X-ray fluorescence analysis with synchrotron radiation. Eur J Mineral 21(5):927–945.  https://doi.org/10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1964 Google Scholar
  77. Schmutz H-U (1976) Der Mafitit-Ultramafitit-Komplex zwischen Chiavenna und Val Bondasca. Beiträge zur Geologischen Karte der Schweiz 149:73Google Scholar
  78. Sizova E, Gerya T, Brown M, Perchuk L (2010) Subduction styles in the Precambrian: insight from numerical experiments. Lithos 116(3):209–229Google Scholar
  79. Stampfli GM, Mosar J, Marquer D et al (1998) Subduction and obduction processes in the Swiss Alps. Tectonophysics 296(1):159–204Google Scholar
  80. Todd CS, Engi M (1997) Metamorphic field gradients in the Central Alps. J Metamorph Geol 15(4):513–530Google Scholar
  81. Trommsdorff V (1990) Metamorphism and tectonics in the Central Alps: the Alpine lithospheric mélange of Cima Lunga and Adula. Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 45:39–49Google Scholar
  82. Tumiati S, Zanchetta S, Pellegrino L, Ferrario C, Casartelli S, Malaspina N (2018) Granulite-facies overprint in garnet peridotites and kyanite eclogites of Monte Duria (Central Alps, Italy): clues from srilankite- and sapphirine-bearing symplectites. J Petrol 59(1):115–152Google Scholar
  83. Von Blanckenburg F (1992) Combined high-precision chronometry and geochemical tracing using accessory minerals: applied to the Central-Alpine Bergell intrusion (central Europe). Chem Geol 100(1–2):19–40Google Scholar
  84. Von Blanckenburg F, Davies JH (1995) Slab breakoff: a model for syncollisional magmatism and tectonics in the Alps. Tectonics 14(1):120–131Google Scholar
  85. Watson E, Wark D, Thomas J (2006) Crystallization thermometers for zircon and rutile. Contrib Mineral Petrol 151(4):413–433Google Scholar
  86. Weh M, Froitzheim N (2001) Penninic cover nappes in the Prättigau half-window (Eastern Switzerland): structure and tectonic evolution. Eclogae Geol Helv 94:237–252Google Scholar
  87. White RW, Powell R, Clarke G (2002) The interpretation of reaction textures in Fe-rich metapelitic granulites of the Musgrave Block, central Australia: constraints from mineral equilibria calculations in the system K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O–TiO2–Fe2O3. J Metamorph Geol 20(1):41–55Google Scholar
  88. White RW, Pomroy NE, Powell R (2005) An in situ metatexite–diatexite transition in upper amphibolite facies rocks from Broken Hill, Australia. J Metamorph Geol 23(7):579–602Google Scholar
  89. White RW, Powell R, Holland TJB (2007) Progress relating to calculation of partial melting equilibria for metapelites. J Metamorph Geol 25(5):511–527Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Geologische Vereinigung e.V. (GV) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Earth Observatory of SingaporeNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Institute of GeosciencesChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations