Subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath Central Europe
- 1.4k Downloads
Mantle xenoliths in Oligocene–Miocene alkaline lavas in Lower Silesia (SW Poland) and adjacent part of Upper Lusatia (SE Germany) are samples of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle at the time of culmination of rifting in the Eger Rift (Bohemian Massif, Central Europe). The xenoliths come from the spinel mantle facies and show that two major lithologies occur in the area: A—highly magnesian (olivine Fo 90.5–92.0) harzburgites, and B—less magnesian (olivine Fo 84.0–90.0) harzburgites. The protolith of group A was clinopyroxene-free harzburgite being the residue after extensive melting. It was affected by chromatographic carbonatite/silicate melt metasomatism, with the carbonatite metasomatism only recorded in distal parts of the chromatographic systems. The B harzburgites were penetratively metasomatised by percolating alkaline silicate melts at the time of volcanism. That metasomatism was mostly anhydrous and typically cryptic; it lowered the Mg/(Mg + Fe) ratio of olivine and orthopyroxene in the peridotites subjected to melt percolation and led in places to dissolution of clinopyroxene. The mostly harzburgitic subcontinental mantle lithospheric domain beneath Lower Silesia and Upper Lusatia differs from the lherzolitic/harzburgitic ones located to W and SW beneath other parts of European Variscan orogen.
KeywordsLithospheric mantle Lithology Metasomatism Central Europe
The subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath Central and Western Europe was sampled by numerous volcanoes active since late Mesozoic until Quaternary. The area of volcanism stretches from Massif Central in France to Lower Silesia in Poland and is often termed as the “Central European Volcanic Province” (CEVP; Wimmenauer 1974). The CEVP is situated in the European Variscan orogen and marks its response to lithospheric stresses generated by the evolving Alpine orogen, which is located to the south (Dézes et al. 2004).
The alkaline lavas of CEVP have various compositions (Lustrino and Wilson 2007). The study of their chemical characteristics provides indirect information on the—commonly asthenospheric—source region. Many of those lavas contain lithospheric mantle xenoliths, which enable direct—sample based—study of lithospheric mantle at the time of volcanism. In this paper, we summarise our studies of mantle xenoliths occurring in the lavas of the eastern part of CEVP, comprising Lower Silesia (SW Poland) and adjacent part of Upper Lusatia (SE Germany). We show that lithospheric mantle peridotites have commonly been affected by melts migrating through the mantle at the time of volcanism and that in places harzburgites, being the residues of after extensive melting, are preserved, although mostly overprinted by carbonatite/silicate melt metasomatism. We also show that the harzburgitic subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) beneath Lower Silesia and Upper Lusatia is rather different from lherzolitic to harzburgitic SCLM beneath located more to the west and south-west part of the European Variscan orogen.
Mantle pyroxenites, which occur abundantly in one of the studied sites, have been shown to be the syn-volcanic cumulates of the alkaline lavas (Puziewicz et al. 2011) and are not included in this paper.
Geological framework of the lithospheric mantle description
The main phases of volcanic activity in Eger Rift occurred in Oligocene and Lower Miocene times (Ulrych et al. 2011). Volcanic activity in Lower Silesia culminated in Eocene–Oligocene (34–26 Ma) and Lower Miocene (22–18 Ma); subordinate Pliocene–Pleistocene event took place at 5.5–1.0 Ma (K–Ar datings; Pécskay and Birkenmajer 2013; Birkenmajer and Pécskay 2002; Birkenmajer et al. 2002, 2004a, b, 2007, 2011).
We describe the lithology of subcontinental lithospheric mantle emerging from study of xenoliths from several localities (Fig. 1): Steinberg and Księginki, located at the margins of the NE termination of the Eger Rift, from Krzeniów, Wilcza Góra and Winna Góra (the Złotoryja–Jawor Complex, off-rift location), and an isolated off-rift basalt occurrence in Pilchowice. The basanite from Steinberg is dated at ca. 30 Ma (Tietz et al. 2013), whereas the nephelinite from Księginki is ca. 27–32 Ma (Birkenmajer et al. 2011). The Krzeniów basanite is ca. 19 Ma (Birkenmajer et al. 2007), the Wilcza Góra basanite is ca. 20 Ma (Birkenmajer et al. 2007), and the Winna Góra basanite is ca. 22 Ma (Birkenmajer et al. 2002). The nephelinite from Pilchowice is dated at 23 Ma (Birkenmajer et al. 2011).
The xenoliths described were samples of the lithospheric mantle at the syn-rift culmination of volcanism in the Eger Rift, which occurred from 32 to 18 Ma (Ulrych et al. 2011). A study of Księginki xenoliths showed that the lithospheric mantle was heated at this time (ca. 30 Ma) by lavas moving upwards both in channelised and pervasive modes (Puziewicz et al. 2011). Therefore, our data describe the hot syn-rift state of the lithospheric mantle. The much younger xenolith suites from Kozákov in Czech Republic (ca. 4.0 Ma, Šibrava and Havlíček 1980; Ackerman et al. 2007) and Lutynia (5.5–3.8 Ma, Birkenmajer et al. 2002; Matusiak-Małek et al. 2010) represent the cooled mantle lithologies, and conductive geotherms have been proposed for both sites (Christensen et al. 2001; Puziewicz et al. 2012).
Analytical methods and terminology
The data presented in this paper come from published (Puziewicz et al. 2011; Ćwiek et al. 2013; Kukuła et al. 2013; Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014) and unpublished studies. Modal composition of peridotites from Księginki and Krzeniów was estimated by using digital method of image analysis by Higgins (2000) and that of peridotites from other localities by JMicroVision software on high-resolution scans of one thick section per xenolith. The modal analyses of the xenoliths from the sites described in our study were previously presented by many authors (e.g. Kozłowska-Koch 1981; Smulikowski and Kozłowska-Koch 1984), but we use only the data from xenoliths studied by us in the following section.
The chemical composition of minerals was analysed by using the CAMECA SX100 electron microprobe at the Department of Lithospheric Research, University of Vienna (for details see Puziewicz et al. 2011). Trace element contents in minerals were analysed by LA-ICP-MS technique at Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi Pyrénées, University Toulouse III, Toulouse (for details see Puziewicz et al. 2011) and at Polish Academy of Sciences in Kraków (for details see Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014). Since this paper is intended to show broad spectrum of data, we present them in figures; the analytical data presented in the figures are available in the papers describing individual sites or from the first author upon request.
We use the IUGS terminology for rocks and that of Morimoto (1989) for pyroxenes. The formulae of silicates are calculated assuming total Fe as Fe2+, whereas the content of Fe3+ in spinel is calculated by charge balance. The atomic ratio of Mg/(Mg + Fe2+) in formula units of ortho- and clinopyroxene and spinel is denoted as mg# that of Cr/(Cr + Al) in formula units of spinel as cr#. The “Fo” denotes molar % of forsterite in olivine, and the “apfu” stands for “atom/atoms per formula unit”.
Lithology of the syn-rift lithospheric mantle beneath Lower Silesia
The xenoliths are usually too small (<5 cm) to allow representative bulk rock chemical analyses. Since clinopyroxene is the main repository of trace elements in spinel facies mantle peridotites, trace element compositions were studied in situ in clinopyroxene. Trace element contents in group A clinopyroxene are usually lower than or close to that of primitive mantle, except for the LREE, which are enriched in some localities. Their REE patterns vary between “spoon-shaped” and asymmetric “U-shaped” (Fig. 7). The group A trace element patterns exhibit deep Nb–Ta and Zr–Hf negative anomalies (Fig. 7). Ti is always depleted relative to primitive mantle (Fig. 7). Elevated Th-U contents occur locally.
Group B clinopyroxene is richer in trace elements, with concentrations are above those of primitive mantle. Its patterns typically show an increase from HREE to LREE with an inflection in LREE (Fig. 7). The trace element patterns show anomalies similar to those of “A” clinopyroxene, but generally much shallower except for Ti in some (Fig. 7).
Spinel is typically sparse and is commonly associated with fine-grained aggregates representing infiltrated silicate melt (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2013). We suspect that spinels in this kind of aggregates have been chemically affected by the melt (e.g. Krzeniów), and thus, we do not discuss them. Spinel that surrounds primary phases is characterised by high and variable cr# (e.g. 0.40–0.54 in Steinberg) which suggests that its chemical composition is not equilibrated.
Pliocene samples of off-rift lithospheric mantle from Lutynia
Geological controls of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle lithology
The Bohemian Massif was assembled during Variscan times, and the seismic anisotropy of its lithospheric mantle differs among major tectonic units (Plomerová et al. 2012 and references therein). The lithospheric mantle of Lower Silesia and adjoining part of Upper Lusatia exhibits “Saxothuringian” seismic characteristics (Plomerová et al. 2012), suggesting that it is a coherent fragment of mantle root of one of the terranes accreted to the Variscan orogen. Geological models of the evolution of the Variscan orogen assume significant post-orogenic delamination and upwelling of asthenospheric material (Ziegler and Dèzes 2005; Massone 2006). Therefore, at the end of Variscan time, the subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) of the peneplained orogen probably consisted of mantle roots of the accreted terranes, which in places have been replaced by lithospherised upwelled asthenosphere. This lithospheric mantle was further modified during the Alpine orogeny by migrating alkaline silicate melts (Puziewicz et al. 2011) and possibly by other metasomatic media.
The Moho in this area is located at depths of 30–35 km (e.g. Majdanski et al. 2006; Grad et al. 2008; Geissler et al. 2012). Data from Puziewicz et al. (2011) show that, at the time of rifting, the temperature of advectively heated lithospheric mantle was probably close to 1,100 °C at depths slightly beneath the Moho. Above 1,100 °C, the stability field of spinel lherzolites expands significantly to pressures exceeding 1.7 GPa (Walter et al. 2002 and references therein), which corresponds to ca. 56 km depth. The transition from spinel to garnet facies in “hot” lithospheric mantle takes place between 50 and 70 km depth (Ziberna et al. 2013). Since the mantle peridotite xenoliths in the alkaline lavas of Central Europe belong to the spinel facies, we suggest that (1) the spinel- to garnet-facies transition corresponded to the rheological boundary between lithosphere and asthenosphere at the time of volcanism and (2) 70 km is the maximum depth of the lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary at the time of the syn-rift culmination of volcanism in this part of the Bohemian Massif. Thus, the mantle samples described here come most probably from the mantle section located at depths from 30 to 70 km.
Thermal evolution of the SCLM
To estimate the thermal state of the studied SCLM, we have used two geothermometers: (1) based on ortho- and clinopyroxene solvus (Brey and Köhler 1990) and (2) based on equilibrium between orthopyroxene and spinel (Witt-Eickschen and Seck 1991). In numerous samples, the ortho- and clinopyroxene or orthopyroxene and spinel are not in equilibrium, which makes the estimations of temperatures impossible [disequilibrium results in calculated temperatures spanning up to 80 °C in a single xenolith (Brey and Köhler 1990 algorithm) or up to 130 °C (Witt-Eickschen and Seck 1991 algorithm)]. Brey and Köhler’s (1990) algorithm yields consistent results in xenoliths from Księginki and Wilcza Góra, and some samples from Krzeniów and Lutynia. The “Al–Cr in orthopyroxene” geothermometer (Witt-Eickschen and Seck, 1991) gives temperatures similar to or slightly higher than those estimated with the use of Brey and Köhler (1990) algorithm.
The distribution of temperatures in the lithospheric mantle during syn-rift volcanism was in our opinion shaped by advective heat input from the magmas moving from their asthenospheric sources to the surface. The volume of moving magmas and/or the time of their migration was sufficient to rise temperature of SCLM beneath Księginki (on-rift location) to temperatures 1,060–1,120 °C at depth 35–50 km (Puziewicz et al. 2011). The data from off-rift sites generally show temperatures varying between 910 and 1,000 °C (Wilcza Góra and some xenoliths from Krzeniów, Pilchowice, Winna Góra, irrespective of their chemical classification into A or B group), suggesting that temperatures increased during rifting, but were variable at the local scale. Slightly lower temperatures are recorded only in some group B xenoliths from Winna Góra and Krzeniów (870–930 °C). Some Krzeniów group A xenoliths containing clinopyroxene with elevated mg# record temperatures of 830–865 °C. Precise estimates of pressure in the studied samples are not possible, so the geothermometric data show the temperature distribution at depths between 30 and 70 km. They suggest that the SCLM in the off-rift locations was 100–200 °C colder comparing to that in the on-rift Księginki site (max. 1,120 °C), and that the depleted A peridotites possibly record lower temperatures from a time preceding the SCLM heating during Alpine syn-rift culmination of the volcanism.
Temperatures of 960–1,000 °C are reported for the younger Lutynia xenoliths (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2010), for which Puziewicz et al. (2012) speculated the 50 km depth of origin. These temperatures are similar to those characterising the off-rift SCLM at the time of syn-rift volcanism culmination. This suggests that post-rift cooling of the SCLM in the Lower Silesia was relatively slow. We suggest that the possible explanation is heating due to the prolonged magma production in the asthenospheric mantle, manifested by the post-rift episodes of volcanism (16–0.26 Ma, Ulrych et al. 2011).
The origin of “A” SCLM lithology beneath Lower Silesia and Upper Lusatia
The clinopyroxene in “A” harzburgites is texturally interstitial and later than the olivine and orthopyroxene. It is Ca-rich, Al-poor and strongly magnesian. High Ca content and high mg# suggest a relatively low temperature of formation (e.g. Brey et al. 1990). The content of Al in clinopyroxene in spinel mantle-facies assemblages is defined by the reaction CaMgSi2O6(cpx) + MgAl2O4(sp) = CaAl2SiO6(cpx) + Mg2SiO4(ol) (e.g. Liu and O’Neill 2004), and the low-Al spinel occurs in assemblages containing low-Al, high-Cr spinel (Pickering-Witter and Johnston 2000). This suggests that the composition of A clinopyroxene was formed under relatively low temperatures (830–865 °C is suggested in the Krzeniów xenoliths, see above) and in a system which was impoverished in Al. Matusiak-Małek et al. (2014) show that the A harzburgites are residues after ca. 30 % melt extraction and that all clinopyroxene is a metasomatic phase. Some of the grains of this clinopyroxene preserve HREE patterns suggesting melt extraction (cf. Fig. 7), which, however, is not the case (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014). The LREE parts of the patterns show metasomatic enrichment, associated with deep Nb–Ta and Zr–Hf negative anomalies, and locally, Ti anomaly (Fig. 7), which led Matusiak-Małek et al. (2014) to the conclusion that the trace element contents in the A clinopyroxene, was shaped by carbonatitic melt.
The “carbonatitic” trace element record is often obliterated to different degrees by the action of silicate melt, which is expressed by the shallowing or disappearance of the MREE “depression” of REE pattern and shallowing of negative anomalies in the trace element patterns (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014). This is connected with an increase of Al and decrease of Ca contents in the host clinopyroxene. This is best explained by chromatographic metasomatism by carbonated alkaline silicate melt, gradually enriching in carbonatitic component due to its reactive percolation in harzburgites, which eventually lead to unmixing of immiscible carbonatitic melt. Only the latter affected metasomatically distal parts of chromatographic systems, and the clinopyroxene-free A harzburgites represent pristine lithology formed by extensive melt extraction (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014).
The “Fe-metasomatism”: origin of the “B” lithology
The harzburgites of group B contain olivine whose forsterite content varies from ca. 90.0 to 84.0 mol% (Fig. 4) and is positively correlated with mg# variation in ortho- (Fig. 5) and clinopyroxene (Fig. 6). The REE patterns of clinopyroxene indicate equilibration with silicate melt (Fig. 7), as also shown by the REE patterns of orthopyroxene (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014). Formation of group B peridotites appears to be similar to that suggested by Puziewicz et al. (2011) for the Księginki xenolith suite. The harzburgites from the Księginki SCLM were infiltrated—at mantle depth—by alkaline (nephelinitic) silicate melt which reacted with the host; the xenolith suite consists of rocks sampled at various stages of melt infiltration/reaction. The reaction of harzburgite with melt led to cryptic metasomatism which resulted in a decrease of mg# of silicates. Similar effects of melt infiltration occur in the Krzeniów xenolith suite (Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014). The metasomatising melts were typically anhydrous, since hydrous phases (amphibole) in mantle xenoliths are scarce in the region.
Kelemen et al. (1992) showed that melts formed in mantle under high pressure are saturated only in olivine under lower pressure and will dissolve pyroxenes during reaction with peridotites. However, these melts become saturated in orthopyroxene and, when colder, in clinopyroxene, which leads to production of harzburgite or lherzolite. The high-pressure phase relations of alkaline silicate melts (Baltitude and Green 1971; Tatsumi et al. 1999) show that, at pressures below 2 GPa and in carbonate-free compositions, olivine is a liquidus phase, whereas clinopyroxene crystallises in lower temperatures; pressure decrease shifts down the temperatures of clinopyroxene crystallisation. In the complex natural systems studied by Baltitude and Green (1971), the forsterite content in olivine crystallising below the liquidus was down to ca. 87 mol%. This, together with experiments showing reaction relationships of alkaline melts with mantle peridotites (Tursack and Liang 2012 and references therein), shows that alkaline silicate melt percolation in peridotitic rock leads to decrease of mg# of olivine and pyroxenes and that ortho- and clinopyroxene can be either dissolved or crystallised, depending on temperature, pressure and melt composition. In our opinion, the discussed experimental data together with observations from the Księginki and Krzeniów peridotites (Puziewicz et al. 2011; Matusiak-Małek et al. 2014) show that the “B” mantle lithology originated due to syn-volcanic percolation of alkaline silicate melts in SCLM harzburgites. We speculate that the latter might have been similar to the “A” lithology.
The lithology beyond standard?
SCLM below Lower Silesia and adjoining part of Upper Lusatia is dominated by harzburgites, which occur in two major varieties. The first one (group A) has highly magnesian, low aluminium characteristics with extreme depletion in Zr and Hf. Such rocks are unusual in the SCLM settings. Our data show that group A harzburgites escaped the metasomatic modification by alkaline silicate melts, which occurred during the Alpine rifting and volcanism. The second harzburgite variety (group B) records this metasomatism, which was generally anhydrous, did not change the low-aluminous nature of the protolith, but lowered the forsterite content in olivine to 84–90 mol% and the mg# of orthopyroxene to corresponding values. The harzburgites with Fo84–88 olivine are not common in SCLM (Griffin et al. 1999).
The xenoliths from the central part of the Eger Rift (České Středohoři Volcanic Complex) have mostly harzburgitic compositions, many of them contain Al-poor orthopyroxene (mg# 90.6–92.3), coexisting in some with and Al-poor clinopyroxene of mg# 93.1–94.7, and olivine in almost all of them contains 90.0–91.6 % of forsterite (Ackerman et al. 2014). The clinopyroxene of mg# 92.0–94.5 and extremely depleted in Zr and Hf occurs only in harzburgites from the Plešný Hill, which is located ca 32 km WSW from the Steinberg (Lusatian Volcanic Field; Ackerman et al. 2014). Thus, SCLM consisting at least partly of A harzburgites extends to this place, but probably not to the SW to central part of the Eger Rift. The data of Ackerman et al. (2013) show also that SCLM beneath SW termination of Eger Rift in north-eastern Bavaria has different lithology: it is dominated by lherzolites, ortho- and clinopyroxene are more aluminous (>2.0 and >2.7 wt% Al2O3, respectively), and no Zr–Hf negative anomaly occurs in clinopyroxene.
The xenoliths representing SCLM beneath located to the west Rhön Mts. in Germany and French Massif Central are predominantly lherzolites (e.g. Franz et al. 1997; Zangana et al. 1997; Lenoir et al. 2000), and those occurring in Eifel Mts. are also rich in hydrous minerals, mostly amphibole (e.g. Witt-Eickschen et al. 1993). Thus, the dominantly harzburgitic Lower Silesian–Upper Lusatian SCLM is different and “beyond standard”. Since the NE part of the Bohemian Massif is located at the margin of the Variscan orogen in Europe, we speculate that the lithology of lithospheric mantle possibly is related to this palaeotectonic setting.
Two major lithologies occur in the SCLM beneath N and NE Bohemian Massif (Lower Silesia and adjoining part of Upper Lusatia), which we term “A” and “B” following the classification presented by Matusiak-Małek et al. (2014). Both of them are harzburgitic. The “A” harzburgites are characterised by highly magnesian composition of olivine (Fo > 90.5 mol%) and low-Al (<0.10 apfu) orthopyroxene and are residues after extensive melting, locally only little metasomatised by carbonatite/silicate melts. The clinopyroxene in A harzburgites is all metasomatic. This lithology probably represents the lithospheric mantle accreted in Variscan times and little affected during the Alpine orogeny. The “B” harzburgites contain less magnesian olivine (Fo 90.0–84.0 mol%) and usually preserve the Al-depleted signature of orthopyroxene. REE and trace element patterns of B clinopyroxene suggest that the protolith, which had already been affected by carbonatite metasomatism, later equilibrated with alkaline silicate melts. This lithology was shaped during the Alpine orogeny by silicate melts percolating through SCLM. The mostly harzburgitic and Al-depleted lithospheric mantle domain beneath Lower Silesia and Upper Lusatia is different from those located to the west and south-west, which are lherzolitic to harzburgitic and more aluminous.
The data presented in this paper are the outcome of our studies performed thanks to projects N N307 100634 of Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (2008–2011) to JP and DEC-2011/03/B/ST10/06248 (2012–2015) of Polish National Centre for Scientific Research to MMM. Large part of analytical work was performed thanks to the joint 2008–2009, 2010–2011 and 2013–2104 projects in the frame of Austrian-Polish scientific and cultural cooperation agreement (Institute of Geological Sciences University of Wrocław and Department of Lithospheric Sciences, University of Vienna) and joint 2009–2010 project in the frame French-Polish scientific agreement POLONIUM (Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Wrocław and Midi-Pyrenees Observatory, University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse).
- Ackerman L, Medaris G Jr, Špaček P, Ulrych J (2014) Geochemical and petrological constraints on mantle composition of the Ohře (Eger) rift, Bohemian Massif: peridotite xenoliths from the České Středohoři Volcanic complex and northern Bohemia. Int J Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s00531-014-1054-1 Google Scholar
- Badura J, Aleksandrowski P (2013) On the northern termination of the Eger (Ohře) Graben. In: Büchner J, Rapprich V, Tietz O (eds) Basalt 2013—Cenozoic magmatism in Central Europe, abstract & excursion guides, pp 70–71Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z (2002) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. I. Alkali basaltic rocks of the Opole region. Bull Pol Acad Sci Earth Sci 50:31–50Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z, Grabowski J, Lorenc M, Zagożdżon P (2002) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. II. K-Ar and paleomagnetic data from Neogene basanites near Lądek Zdrój, Sudetes Mts. Ann Soc Geol Pol 72:119–129Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z, Grabowski J, Lorenc MW, Zagożdżon P (2004a) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. IV. Further K-Ar and paleomagnetic data from late Oligocene to early Miocene basaltic rocks of the Fore-Sudetic Block. Ann Soc Geol Pol 74:1–19Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z, Grabowski J, Lorenc MW, Zagożdżon P (2004b) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. III. K-Ar and paleomagnetic data from early Miocene basaltic rocks near Jawor, Fore-Sudetic Block. Ann Soc Geol Poloniae 72:241–253Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z, Grabowski J, Lorenc MW, Zagożdżon P (2007) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. V. K-Ar and palaeomagnetic data from late Oligocene to early Miocene basaltic rocks of the North-Sudetic Depression. Ann Soc Geol Pol 77:1–16Google Scholar
- Birkenmajer K, Pécskay Z, Grabowski J, Lorenc MW, Zagożdżon PP (2011) Radiometric dating of the Tertiary volcanics in Lower Silesia, Poland. VI. K-Ar and palaeomagnetic data from basaltic rocks of the West Sudety Mountains and their northern foreland. Ann Soc Geol Pol 81:115–131Google Scholar
- Ćwiek M, Puziewicz J, Ntaflos T, Kukuła A (2013) Preliminary data on mantle xenoliths from the Pilchowice basanite (SW Poland). In: Büchner J, Rapprich V, Tietz O (eds) Basalt 2013—Cenozoic magmatism in Central Europe, abstract & excursion guides, p 47Google Scholar
- Grad M, Guterch A, Mazur S, Randy Keller G, Špičák A, Hrubcová P, Geissler WH (2008) Lithospheric structure of the Bohemian Massif and adjacent Variscan belt in central Europe based on profile S01 from the SUDETES 2003 experiment. J Geophys Res 113:B10304. doi:10.1029/2007JB005497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Griffin WL, O’Reilly S, Ryan CG (1999) The composition and origin of sub-continental lithospheric mantle. The Geochemical Society Special Publication 6 (Mantle petrology: field observations and high pressure experimentation: a tribute to Francis R. Joe Boyd), pp 13–45Google Scholar
- Kozłowska-Koch M (1981) Petrography of ultramafic nodules in the nephelinites from Księginki near Lubań (Lower Silesia). Arch Mineral 37(1):33–59Google Scholar
- Kukuła A, Puziewicz J, Ntaflos T, Büchner J, Tietz O (2013) Preliminary data on mantle xenoliths from Steinberg (Upper Lusatia, SE Germany). In: Büchner J, Rapprich V, Tietz O (eds) Basalt 2013—Cenozoic magmatism in Central Europe, abstract & excursion guides, pp 45–46Google Scholar
- Matusiak-Małek M, Puziewicz J, Ntaflos T (2013) Origin of intergranular aggregates in mantle xenoliths from Krzeniów basanite. Geosci Notes 1:25–49Google Scholar
- Matusiak-Małek M, Puziewicz J, Ntaflos T, Grégoire M, Benoit M, Klügel A (2014) Two contrasting lithologies in off-rift subcontinental lithospheric mantle beneath Central Europe—the Krzeniów (SW Poland) case study. J Petrol 55 (in press)Google Scholar
- Morimoto N (1989) Nomenclature of pyroxenes. Subcomission of new minerals and mineral names. International mineralogical association. Can Mineral 27:143–156Google Scholar
- Napieralska M, Muszyński A (2006) Peridotite enclaves in picrobasalt from wołek Hill near Nowy Kościół (SW Poland)—preliminary data. Miner Pol Spec Pap 2:63–65Google Scholar
- Pécskay Z, Birkenmajer K (2013) Insight into the geochronology of Cenozoic alkaline basaltic volcanic activity in Lower Silesia (SW Poland) and adjacent areas.). In: Büchner J, Rapprich V, Tietz O (eds) Basalt 2013—Cenozoic magmatism in Central Europe, abstract & excursion guides, pp 66–67Google Scholar
- Puziewicz J, Czechowski L, Krysiński L, Majorowicz J, Matusiak-Małek M, Wróblewska M (2012) Lithosphere thermal structure at the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif: a case petrological and geophysical study of the Niedźwiedź amphibolite massif (SW Poland). Int J Earth Sci 101:1211–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sawicki L (1995) Geological map of Lower Silesia with adjacent Czech and German territories (without Quaternary deposits) 1:100000. Państwowy Instytut GeologicznyGoogle Scholar
- Šibrava V, Havlíček P (1980) Radiometric age of Plio-Pleistocene volcanic rocks of the Bohemian Massif. Věstník Ústředniho Ústavu Geologickeho 55(3):129–140Google Scholar
- Smulikowski K, Kozłowska-Koch M (1984) Basaltoids of Wilcza Góra near Złotoryja (Lower Silesia) and their enclosures. Archiwum Mineralogiczne 40(1): 53–101 (in Polish, English summary)Google Scholar
- Tietz O, Büchner J, Suhr P, Goth K (2013). Field trip 3: volcanology of the Lusatian Volcanic Field—New insights in old well known. In: Büchner J, Rapprich V, Tietz O (eds) Basalt 2013—Cenozoic magmatism in Central Europe, abstract & excursion guides, pp 275–297Google Scholar
- Ulrych J, Pivec E, Lang M, Balogh K, Kropáček V (1999) Cenozoic intraplate volcanic rock series of the Bohemian Massif: a review. Geolines 9:123–129Google Scholar
- Wimmenauer W (1974) The alkaline province of Central Europe and France. In: Sørensen H (ed) The alkaline rocks. Wiley, London, pp 286–291Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.