Advertisement

International Journal of Earth Sciences

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 775–796 | Cite as

Transcurrent nature of the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone in Central Europe: results of the POLCRUST-01 deep reflection seismic profile

  • M. Narkiewicz
  • A. Maksym
  • M. Malinowski
  • M. Grad
  • A. Guterch
  • Z. Petecki
  • J. Probulski
  • T. Janik
  • M. Majdański
  • P. Środa
  • W. Czuba
  • E. Gaczyński
  • L. Jankowski
Original Paper

Abstract

Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone (TTZ) corresponds to a crustal boundary between the Precambrian East European Platform (EEP) and the Palaeozoic West European Platform. Although the zone has been controlling Phanerozoic evolution of large parts of Central Europe, its course, geometry and origin are still poorly constrained. Deep reflection seismic profile POLCRUST-01, recently acquired in SE Poland, for the first time allowed a precise comparison of the Ediacaran and later tectonic patterns to the deep crustal features of the TTZ and adjacent areas. The TTZ corresponds to the subvertical Tomaszów Fault separating the Radom–Kraśnik Elevation, composed of the typical EEP crust, from the Biłgoraj–Narol Block (BNB) in the SW, with a thinned crystalline basement showing affinities to the EEP crust. The BNB is a part of the larger Caledonian Łysogóry Terrane as evidenced by its Lower Palaeozoic stratigraphy and gravity data. Thus, for the first time, the proximal Baltican affinity of this unit has been documented unambiguously. The Łysogóry Terrane is delimited from the SW by the subvertical Cieszanów Fault Zone, corresponding to the Holy Cross Suture. The adjacent Małopolska Terrane is characterized by a distinct Early Palaeozoic stratigraphy, and lower-middle crust exhibiting SW-dipping reflective packages interpreted as NE-verging thrust and shear zones of a Neoproterozoic orogen. The observations from the POLCRUST-01 profile and regional comparisons indicate that the TTZ is a major Caledonian transcurrent zone between Poland and East Romania. In central Poland, the TTZ likely forms a narrow subvertical contact between the EEP and a proximal Kuiavia Terrane, as constrained by the deep refraction seismic data. To the NW, the zone extends towards the Pomeranian part of the Caledonide fold-and-thrust belt related to the Avalonia–Baltica collision zone (Thor Suture). South-east of Poland the TTZ corresponds to the Rava Ruska Fault Zone established as a Caledonian suture separating adjacent terrane, probably of a Baltican affinity. The East Romanian part of the TTZ conforms with the Sfântu Gheorghe Fault separating reworked EEP crust of the Pre-Dobrogean Depression from the North Dobrogea unit bearing a strong Variscan and Cimmerian overprint.

Keywords

Deep reflection seismic Cratonic margin Crustal accretion Allochthonous terrane Caledonian tectonics Tectonic inheritance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

POLCRUST-01 profile was acquired by the Industry-Academia Consortium led by the Institute of Geophysics PAS (together with “Geofizyka Toruń” Ltd. and PGNiG SA - Polish Oil and Gas Company) and was funded by the Polish Ministry of Environment through the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (Contract no 705/2009/Wn - 07/FG - BP - TX/D) and Polish Oil and Gas Company PGNiG SA. This work was partly supported within statutory activities No 3841/E-41/S/2014 of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland. We wish to thank the journal reviewers, Charlotte M. Krawczyk and Marian Munteanu, for their constructive remarks.

References

  1. Balintoni I, Balica C, Seghedi A, Ducea MN (2010) Avalonian and Cadomian terranes in north Dobrogea, Romania. Precambrian Res 182:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belka Z, Valverde-Vaquero P, Dörr W, Ahrendt H, Wemmer K, Franke W, Schäfer J (2002) Accretion of first Gondwana-derived terranes at the margin of Baltica. In: Winchester JA, Pharaoh TC, Verniers J (eds) Palaeozoic Amalgamation of Central Europe, Geol Soc London Sp Pub 201, pp 19–36Google Scholar
  3. Berthelsen A (1984) The early (800–300 Ma) crustal evolution of the off-shield regions of Europe. First EGT Workshop, The Northern Segment, ESF, Strasbourg, pp 125–142Google Scholar
  4. Berthelsen A (1993) Where different geological philosophies meet: the Trans-European Suture Zone. Publ Inst Geophys Pol Acad Sci A20:19–31Google Scholar
  5. Berthelsen A (1998) The Tornquist Zone northwest of the Carpathians: an intraplate pseudosuture. Geol Fören Stockh Förh 120:223–230Google Scholar
  6. Blakely RJ (1995) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocin A, Stephenson R, Matenco L, Mocanu V (2013) Gravity and magnetic modelling in the Vrancea Zone, south-eastern Carpathians: redefinition of the edge of the East European Craton beneath the south-eastern Carpathians. J Geodyn 71:52–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brochwicz-Lewiński W, Pożaryski W, Tomczyk H (1981) Mouvements coulissants de grande ampleur au Paléozoique inférieur le long de la marge sud-ouest de la plate-forme Est-Europeénne. CR Acad Sci Paris 293:855–858Google Scholar
  9. Buła Z, Habryn R (2011) Precambrian and Palaeozoic basement of the Carpathian Foredeep and the adjacent Outer Carpathians (SE Poland and western Ukraine). Ann Soc Geol Pol 81:221–239Google Scholar
  10. Buła Z, Byś I, Florek R, Habryn R, Jachowicz M, Kwarciński J, Laskowicz R, Liszka B, Madej K, Maksym A, Markowiak M, Pietrusiak M, Probulski J, Ryłko W, Salwa S, Sikora R, Staryszak G, Tabol-Wójcik P, Tomaś A, Zacharski J (2008) Geological-structural atlas of the Palaeozoic basement of the Outer Carpathians and Carpathian Foredeep. Polish Ministry of Environment, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiżniakow A, Żelichowski AM (1974) Outline of the tectonics of the Lublin-Lvov area (SE Poland and W Ukraine). Kwart Geol 18:707–719 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  12. Dąbrowski A (1957) The structure of the deep substratum in Western Poland on the basis of geophysical research. Kwart Geol 1:31–39 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  13. Dąbrowski A (1971) Geological results of regional magnetic investigations in Poland. Ann Soc Geol Pol 41:409–416 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  14. Dąbrowski A, Karaczun K, Karaczun M (1981) SW margin of the East-European platform in Poland in the light of new magnetic data. Przegl Geol 29:415–419 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  15. Dadlez R (1982) Permian–Mesozoic tectonics versus basement fractures along the Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone in the territory of Poland. Kwart Geol 26:273–284 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  16. Dadlez R (1984) Deep fractures of the Teisseyre–Tornquist zone interpreted after cover tectonics. Publ Inst Geophys Pol Acad Sci A13:37–45Google Scholar
  17. Dadlez R (2000) Pomeranian Caledonides (NW Poland), fifty years of controversies: a review and a new concept. Geol Q 44:221–236Google Scholar
  18. Dadlez R, Kowalczewski Z, Znosko J (1994) Some key problems of the pre-Permian tectonics of Poland. Geol Q 38:169–189Google Scholar
  19. Dadlez R, Narkiewicz M, Stephenson RA, Visser MTM, van Wees JD (1995) Tectonic evolution of the Mid-Polish Trough: modelling implications and significance for central European geology. Tectonophysics 252:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dadlez R, Marek S, Pokorski J (2000) Geological map of Poland without Cainozoic deposits (1:1 000 000). Polish Geological Institute, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  21. Dadlez R, Grad M, Guterch A (2005) Crustal structure below the Polish Basin: Is it composed of proximal terranes derived from Baltica? Tectonophysics 411:111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ernst T, Jankowski J, Jozwiak W, Lefeld J, Logvinov I (2002) Geoelectrical model along a profile across the Tornquist–Teisseyre zone in southeastern Poland. Acta Geoph Pol 50:505–515Google Scholar
  23. Gągała Ł, Vergés J, Saura E, Malata T, Ringenbach JC, Werner P, Krzywiec P (2012) Architecture and orogenic evolution of the northeastern Outer Carpathians from cross-section balancing and forward modeling. Tectonophysics 532–535:223–241Google Scholar
  24. Grad M, Guterch A, Polkowska-Purys A (2005) Crustal structure of the Trans-European Suture Zone in Central Poland—reinterpretation of the LT-2, LT-4 and LT-5 deep seismic sounding profiles. Geol Q 49:243–252Google Scholar
  25. Grad M, Guterch A, Keller GR, Janik T, Hegedus E, Vozár J, Ślączka A, Tiira T, Yliniemi J (2006a) Lithospheric structure beneath trans-Carpathian transect from Precambrian platform to Pannonian basin: CELEBRATION 2000 seismic profile CEL05. J Geophys Res 111:B03301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grad M, Janik T, Guterch A, Środa P, Czuba W, EUROBRIDGE’94-97, POLONAISE’97 and CELEBRATION 2000 Seismic Working Groups (2006b) Lithospheric structure of the western part of the East European Craton investigated by deep seismic profiles. Geol Q 50:9–22Google Scholar
  27. Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Schmitz MD, Ogg GM (2012) The geologic time scale 2012. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  28. Guterch A, Grad M (2006) Lithospheric structure of the TESZ in Poland based on modern seismic experiments. Geol Q 50:23–32Google Scholar
  29. Guterch A, Grad M, Materzok R, Perchuć E (1986) Deep structure of the earth’s crust in the contact zone of the Palaeozoic and Precambrian Platforms in Poland (Teisseyre–Tornquist Zone). Tectonophysics 128:251–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guterch A, Grad M, Thybo H, Keller GR, POLONAISE Working Group (1999) POLONAISE’97—international seismic experiment between Precambrian and Variscan Europe in Poland. Tectonophysics 314:101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guterch A, Grad M, Keller GR, Posgay K, Vozar J, Špičák A, Brueckl E, Hajnal Z, Thybo H, Selvi O, CELEBRATION 2000 Experiment Team (2003) CELEBRATION 2000 seismic experiment. Stud Geoph Geod 47:659–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guterch A, Wybraniec S, Grad M, Chadwick RA, Krawczyk CM, Ziegler PA, Thybo H, De Vos W (2010) Crustal structure and structural framework. In: Doornenbal JC, Stevenson AG (eds) Petroleum Geological Atlas of the Southern Permian Basin Area. EAGE Publications b.v., Houten, pp 11–23Google Scholar
  33. Hippolyte J-C (2002) Geodynamics of Dobrogea (Romania): new constraints on the evolution of the Tornquist–Teisseyre Line, the Black Sea and the Carpathians. Tectonophysics 357:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jachowicz-Zdanowska M (2011) Cambrian organic microfossils at the border area of the East- and West-European platforms (SE Poland and western Ukraine). Ann Soc Geol Pol 81:241–267Google Scholar
  35. Janik T, Grad M, Guterch A, CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group (2009) Lithospheric structure between the East European Craton and the Carpathians from the net of CELEBRATION 2000 seismic profiles in SE Poland. Geol Q 53:141–158Google Scholar
  36. Jarosinski M (2012) Compressive deformations and stress propagation in intracontinental lithosphere: finite element modeling along the Dinarides-East European Craton profile. Tectonophysics 526:24–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jaworowski K, Sikorska M (2006) Łysogóry Unit (Central Poland) versus East European Craton—application of sedimentological data from Cambrian siliciclastic association. Geol Q 50:77–88Google Scholar
  38. Kalvoda J, Bábek O (2010) The margins of Laurussia in central and southeast Europe and southwest Asia. Gondwana Res 17:526–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kowalska S, Kranc A, Maksym A, Śmist P (2000) Geology of the north-eastern part of the Carpathian Foredeep basement, the Lubaczów-Biszcza Region. Nafta-Gaz 54:158–178 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  40. Krawczyk CM, McCann T, Cocks LRM, England R, McBride J, Wybraniec S (2008) Caledonian tectonics. In: McCann T (ed) The geology of central Europe. Geological Society of London, London, pp 301–381Google Scholar
  41. Królikowski C (2006) Crustal-scale complexity of the contact zone between the Palaeozoic Platform and the East-European Craton in the NW Poland. Geol Q 50:33–42Google Scholar
  42. Krzywiec P (1999) Miocene tectonic evolution of the Eastern Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Przemyśl–Lubaczów) in light of seismic data interpretation. Prace Państw Inst Geol 168:249–276 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  43. Krzywiec P (2007) Tectonics of the Lublin area (SE Poland)—new views based on results of seismic data interpretation. Biul Państw Inst Geol 422:1–18 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  44. Krzywiec P (2009) Devonian–Cretaceous repeated subsidence and uplift along the Teisseyre–Tornquist zone in SE Poland—Insight from seismic data interpretation. Tectonophysics 475:142–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krzywiec P, Lis P, Buffenmyer V, Malinowski M, Lewandowski M (2013) Regional geologic characterization of the Polish Lower Paleozoic unconventional play using an integrated seismic and well data approach. Unconv Res Technol Conf Denver 1578800:1–5Google Scholar
  46. Kutek J, Głazek J (1972) The Holy Cross area, Central Poland, in the Alpine cycle. Acta Geol Pol 22:603–653Google Scholar
  47. Linnemann U, D’Lemos R, Drost K, Jeffries T, Gerdes A, Romer R, Samson SD, Strachan R (2008) The Cadomian tectonics. In: McCann T (ed) The geology of central Europe. Geological Society of London, London, pp 103–154Google Scholar
  48. Maksym A, Śmist P, Pietrusiak M, Staryszak G, Liszka B (2003) New data on development of the Lower Paleozoic sediments in the Sędziszów Małopolski–Rzeszów region based on Hermanowa-1 borehole (SE Poland). Przegl Geol 51:412–418 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  49. Malinowski M, Żelaźniewicz A, Grad M, Guterch A, Janik T (2005) Seismic and geological structure of the crust in the transition from Baltica to Palaeozoic Europe in SE Poland—CELEBRATION 2000 experiment, profile CEL02. Tectonophysics 401:55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malinowski M, Guterch A, Narkiewicz M, Probulski J, Maksym A, Majdański M, Środa P, Czuba W, Gaczyński E, Grad M, Janik T, Jankowski L, Adamczyk A (2013) Deep seismic reflection profile in Central Europe reveals complex pattern of Paleozoic and Alpine accretion at the East European Craton margin. Geophys Res Letters 40:3841–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Młynarski S (1982) The structure of deep basement in Poland in the light of refraction seismic surveys. Geol Q 26:285–296 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  52. Moczydlowska M (1997) Proterozoic and Cambrian successions in Upper Silesia: an Avalonian terrane in southern Poland. Geol Mag 134:679–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moczydłowska J (1995) Late Proterozoic and Cambrian successions deposited on the East European Platform and Cadomian basement area. Stud Geophys Geod 39:276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Modliński Z, Szymański B (2005) Litostratygrafia ordowiku strefy Biłgoraj–Narol (SE Polska). Biul Państw Inst Geol 416:45–79 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  55. Mucuta DM, Knapp CC, Knapp JH (2006) Constraints from Moho geometry and crustal thickness on the geodynamic origin of the Vrancea Seismogenic Zone (Romania). Tectonophysics 420:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Narkiewicz M (2002) Ordovician through earliest Devonian development of the Holy Cross Mts. (Poland): constraints from subsidence analysis and thermal maturity data. Geol Q 46:255–266Google Scholar
  57. Narkiewicz M (2007) Development and inversion of Devonian and Carboniferous basins in the eastern part of the Variscan foreland (Poland). Geol Q 51:231–256Google Scholar
  58. Narkiewicz M, Dadlez R (2008) Geological regional subdivision of Poland: general guidelines and proposed schemes of sub-Cenozoic and sub-Permian units. Przegl Geol 56:391–397Google Scholar
  59. Narkiewicz M, Grad M, Guterch A, Janik T (2011) Crustal seismic velocity structure of southern Poland: preserved memory of a pre-Devonian terrane accretion at the East European Platform margin. Geol Mag 148:191–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nawrocki J, Dunlap J, Pecskay Z, Krzemiński L, Żylińska A, Fanning M, Kozłowski W, Salwa S, Szczepanik Z, Trela W (2007) Late Neoproterozoic to Early Palaeozoic palaeogeography of the Holy Cross Mountains (Central Europe): an integrated approach. J Geol Soc London 164:405–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Niemczycka T (ed) (1980) Ruszów IG 1 Tarnawatka IG 1. Profile Głęb Otw Wiertn Inst Geol. 50. Inst Geol, Warszawa (in Polish)Google Scholar
  62. Oczlon MS, Seghedi A, Carrigan CW (2007) Avalonian and Baltican terranes in the Moesian Platform (southern Europe, Romania, and Bulgaria) in the context of Caledonian terranes along the southwestern margin of the East European craton. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 423:375–400Google Scholar
  63. Pacześna J, Poprawa P (2005) Eustatic versus tectonic control on the development of Neoproterozoic and Cambrian stratigraphic sequences of the Lublin–Podlasie Basin (SW margin of Baltica). Geosci J 9:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pharaoh TC (1996) Trans-European Suture Zone: phanerozoic accretion and evolution of contrasting continental lithospheres. In: Gee DG, Zeyen HJ (eds) EUROPROBE 1996—Lithosphere dynamics: origin and evolution of continents. EUROPROBE Secretariate, Uppsala University, Uppsala, pp 41–54Google Scholar
  65. Pharaoh TC (1999) Palaeozoic terranes and their lithospheric boundaries within the Trans-European Suture Zone (TESZ): a review. Tectonophysics 314:17–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pharaoh TC, Winchester JA, Verniers J, Lassen A, Seghedi A (2006) The western accretionary margin of the East European Craton: an overview. In: Gee DG, Stephenson RA (eds) European lithosphere dynamics. Geol Soc London Memoir 32, pp 291–311Google Scholar
  67. Pożaryski W (1990) The Middle Europe Caledonides—wrenching orogen composed of terranes. Przegl Geol 38:1–9 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  68. Pożaryski W, Dembowski Z (1983) Geological map of Poland and neighbouring countries without Cenozoic, Mesozoic and Permian deposits (1:1 000 000). Geological Institute, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  69. Pożaryski W, Tomczyk H (1968) Assyntian orogen in south-east Poland. Biul Inst Geol 237:13–27 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  70. Pożaryski W, Tomczyk H (1993) Geological cross-section through SE Poland. Przegl Geol 41:687–695 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  71. Pożaryski W, Grocholski A, Tomczyk H, Karnkowski P, Moryc W (1992) The tectonic map of Poland in the Variscan epoch. Przegl Geol 40:643–651 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  72. Saintot A, Stephenson RA, Stovba S, Brunet MF, Yegorova T, Starostenko V (2006) The evolution of the southern margin of Eastern Europe (Eastern European and Scythian platforms) from the latest Precambrian-Early Palaeozoic to the Early Cretaceous. In: Gee DG, Stephenson RA (eds) European Lithosphere Dynamics. Geol Soc London Memoir 32, pp 481–505Google Scholar
  73. Seghedi A (2012) Palaeozoic formations from Dobrogea and Pre-Dobrogea—an overview. Turk J Earth Sci 21:669–721Google Scholar
  74. Seghedi A, Oaie G, Iordan M, Avram E, Tatu M, Ciulavu D, Vaida M, Radan S, Nicolae I, Seghedi I, Szakács S, Draganescu A (1999) Geology and structure of the Precambrian and Paleozoic basement of North and Central Dobrogea. Mesozoic history of North and Central Dobrogea. Excursion Guide of the Joint Meeting of EUROPROBE TESZ, PANCARDI and GEORIFT Projects. Rom J Tecton Reg Geol 77(suppl 2):1–72Google Scholar
  75. Środa P, Czuba W, Grad M, Guterch A, Tokarski A, Janik T, Rauch M, Keller GR, Hegedüs E, Vozár J, CELEBRATION 2000 Working Group (2006) Crustal structure of the Western Carpathians from CELEBRATION 2000 profiles CEL01 and CEL04: seismic models and geological implication. Geophys J Int 167:737–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Starostenko V, Janik T, Kolomiyets K, Czuba W, Środa P, Grad M, Kovács I, Stephenson R, Lysynchuk D, Thybo H, Artemieva IM, Omelchenko V, Gintov O, Kutas R, Gryn D, Guterch A, Hegedűs E, Komminaho K, Legostaeva O, Tiira T, Tolkunov A (2013a) Seismic velocity model of the crust and upper mantle along profile PANCAKE across the Carpathians between the Pannonian Basin and the East European Craton. Tectonophysics 608:1049–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2013.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Starostenko V, Janik T, Lysynchuk D, Środa P, Czuba W, Kolomiyets K, Aleksandrowski P, Gintov O, Omelchenko V, Komminaho K, Guterch A, Tiira T, Gryn D, Legostaeva O, Thybo H, Tolkunov A (2013b) Mesozoic(?) lithosphere-scale buckling of the East European Craton in southern Ukraine: DOBRE-4 deep seismic profile. Geophys J Int 195:740–766. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Teisseyre R, Teisseyre B (2002) Wawrzyniec Karol de Teisseyre: a pioneer in the study of “cryptotectonics”. EOS 83:541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tornquist A (1908) Die Feststellung des Südwestrandes des baltisch-russischen Schieldes und die geotektonische Zugehörigkeit der ost-preussischen Scholle. Schriften Phys Ökon Ges Königsberg 49:1–12Google Scholar
  80. Unrug R, Harańczyk C, Chocyk-Jamińska M (1999) Easternmost Avalonian and Armorican-Cadomian terranes of central Europe and Caledonian-Variscan evolution of polydeformed Kraków mobile belt: geological constraints. Tectonophysics 302:133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Wees J-D, Stephenson RA, Ziegler PA, Bayer U, McCann T, Dadlez R, Gaupp R, Narkiewicz M, Bitzer F, Scheck M (2000) On the origin of the southern Permian Basin, Central Europe. Mar Pet Geol 17:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. White DJ, Lucas SB, Hajnal Z, Green AG, Lewry JF, Weber W et al (1994) Paleo-Proterozoic thick-skinned tectonics: Lithoprobe seismic reflection results from the eastern Trans-Hudson Orogen. Can J Earth Sci 31:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Winchester JA, Pharaoh TC, Verniers J (2002) Palaeozoic amalgamation of Central Europe: an introduction and synthesis of new results from recent geological and geophysical investigations. In: Winchester JA, Pharaoh TC, Verniers J (eds) Palaeozoic amalgamation of Central Europe, Geol Soc London Sp Pub 201, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  84. Winchester JA, Pharaoh TC, Verniers J, Ioane D, Seghedi A (2006) Palaeozoic accretion of Gondwana-derived terranes to the East European Craton: recognition of detached terrane fragments dispersed after collision with promontories. In: Gee DG, Stephenson RA (eds) European Lithosphere Dynamics. Geol Soc London Memoir 32, pp 323–332Google Scholar
  85. Wybraniec S (1999) Transformations and visualization of potential field data. Pol Geol Inst Spec Pap 1:1–88Google Scholar
  86. Żelaźniewicz A, Buła Z, Fanning M, Seghedi A, Żaba J (2009) More evidence on Neoproterozoic terranes in Southern Poland and southeastern Romania. Geol Q 53:93–124Google Scholar
  87. Żelichowski AM (1972) Evolution of the geological structure of the area between the Góry Świętokrzyskie and the river Bug. Biul Inst Geol 263:7–97 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  88. Żelichowski AM, Kozłowski S (1983) Atlas of geological structure and mineral deposits in the Lublin region. Geological Institute, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  89. Ziegler PA (1990) Geological Atlas of Western and Central Europe, 2nd edn. Shell Internationale Petroleum Maatschappij BV, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  90. Ziegler PA, Cloetingh S, van Wees JD (1995) Dynamics of intra-plate compressional deformation: the Alpine foreland and other examples. Tectonophysics 252:7–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Znosko J (1962) Present status of knowledge of geological structure of deep substratum of Poland beyond the Carpathians. Kwart Geol 6:485–511 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  92. Znosko J (1969) Geologia Kujaw i wschodniej Wielkopolski. In: Żyłko R (ed) Przewodnik XLI Zjazdu PTGeol, Konin, pp 5–48 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  93. Znosko J (1975) Tectonic units of Poland against the background of the tectonics of Europe. Geol Inst Anniv Bull 252:61–75Google Scholar
  94. Znosko J (1977) Über den geologischen Bau in der Zone der Tornquist–Teisseyre-Linie zwischen Ostsee und Swietokrzyskie Gory (VR Polen). Z Angew Geol 23:439–444Google Scholar
  95. Znosko J (1979) Teisseyre–Tornquist tectonic zone: some interpretative implications of recent geological and geophysical investigation. Acta Geol Pol 24:365–383Google Scholar
  96. Znosko J (1986) On the International Tectonic Map of South-Western Margin of the East-European Platform. Przegl Geol 34:545–552Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Narkiewicz
    • 1
  • A. Maksym
    • 2
  • M. Malinowski
    • 3
  • M. Grad
    • 4
  • A. Guterch
    • 3
  • Z. Petecki
    • 1
  • J. Probulski
    • 2
  • T. Janik
    • 3
  • M. Majdański
    • 3
  • P. Środa
    • 3
  • W. Czuba
    • 3
  • E. Gaczyński
    • 3
  • L. Jankowski
    • 5
  1. 1.Polish Geological Institute-NRIWarsawPoland
  2. 2.Polish Oil and Gas CompanyWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Institute of GeophysicsPolish Academy of ScienceWarsawPoland
  4. 4.Institute of Geophysics, Faculty of PhysicsUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  5. 5.Polish Geological Institute-NRIKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations