International Journal of Earth Sciences

, Volume 100, Issue 2–3, pp 511–526 | Cite as

The Witputs diamictite in southern Namibia and associated rocks: constraints for a global glaciation?

  • Udo Zimmermann
  • Jennifer Tait
  • Quentin G. Crowley
  • Vanessa Pashley
  • Gijs Straathof
Original Paper

Abstract

The Witputs section of the Gariep Belt (S Namibia) comprises a sequence of clastic and chemical sediments, which have been interpreted as representative of a Late Neoproterozoic global or near-global ice age event, and recent biostratigraphic work in the upper rocks of the Witputs suggest a Late Ediacaran age. To further characterise this sequence and provide additional age constraints, a detailed sedimentological and detrital zircon study has been carried out. The petrographic, sedimentological and geochemical characteristics of the Witputs diamictite determined in this study are homogenous and indicative of debris flow or palaeo-valley infill sediments, deposited in an oxic environment with no glaciogenic evidence. This homogeneity is also reflected in the detrital zircon age spectra with most ages falling between 1.0 and 1.3 Ga, representing the local geology, with the youngest grain at 1030.2 ± 10.9 (2σ) (n = 92 <10% discordance), despite the fact that mid and Late Neoproterozoic volcanic activity is known in the local region. The overlying carbonate rocks, often considered to be ‘cap carbonates’, show high Mn (up to 60% MnO), with base metal precipitation (Zn, V, Co), and are recrystallised. Their δ13CVPDB isotope ratios are homogeneous at around-3. Major and trace element ratios reach values which indicate that C–O isotopes may be disturbed and might not reflect primary global seawater composition, thus questioning their use for global correlation and comparison with composite chemostratigraphic curves. The contact to the overlying Late Ediacaran Sanddrif Member is not exposed, and the rocks dip in a different direction than the underlying carbonate rocks. The c. 40-m-thick section is characterised by rapid lithology changes including shales, calcareous sandstones and wackes, fine-grained conglomerates and rare clean quartz-rich sandstones, all of which have strikingly similar detrital zircon populations, and the youngest zircon is dated at 1082.8 ± 10 Ma (2σ errors, from 72 grains with <10% discordance). Acritarchs earlier found in the Sanddrif Member, however, indicate a post-570 Ma depositional age. If the diamictites are glacio-marine deposits, then an interesting conclusion is that the clastic sediments can display a very immature geochemical signature, indicating a localised provenance, with derivation purely from the local basement rocks, which is also reflected in the detrital zircon populations. However, we would hesitate to assign a glacial origin to the deposits as no glacial indicators, other than a diamictitic texture, were observed. Clearly, far more work on the detailed mapping and sedimentology of the Neoproterozoic Gariep Belt deposits is required, particularly as many are currently used for global correlation. Age constraints derived from extensive detrital zircon work can only constrain the deposits as being post 1.03 Ma with the detritus being purely locally derived.

Keywords

Snowball earth Correlation Detrital zircon ages Numees Formation Holgat Formation Namibia 

Supplementary material

531_2010_621_MOESM1_ESM.doc (564 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 564 kb)
531_2010_621_MOESM2_ESM.doc (142 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 142 kb)
531_2010_621_MOESM3_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 52 kb)
531_2010_621_MOESM4_ESM.xls (71 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (XLS 71 kb)
531_2010_621_MOESM5_ESM.xls (78 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLS 78 kb)

References

  1. Aftalion M, Bowes DR, Vrána S (1989) Early Carboniferous U–Pb zircon age of garnetiferous, perpotassic granulites, Blansk’y les massif, Czechoslovakia. N Jahrb Min Monats 4:145–152Google Scholar
  2. Basei MAS, Siga O Jr, Masquelin H, Harara OM, Reis Neto JM, Preciozzi Porta F (2000) The Dom Feliciano Belt and the Rio de la Plata Craton: tectonic evolution and correlation with similar provinces of southwestern Africa. In: Cordani UG, Milani EJ, Thomas Filho A, Campos DA (eds) Tectonic evolution of South America. 31st Intern Geol Congress, Rio de Janeiro, pp 311–334Google Scholar
  3. Basei MAS, Frimmel HE, Nutman AP, Preciozzi F, Jacob J (2005) A connection between the Neoproterozoic Dom Feliciano (Brazil/Uruguay) and Gariep (Namibia/South Africa) orogenic belts—evidence from a reconnaissance provenance study. Precambrian Res 139:195–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basei MAS, Frimmel HE, Nutman AP, Preciozzi F (2008) West Gondwana amalgamation based on detrital zircon ages from Neoproterozoic Ribeira and Dom Feliciano belts of South America and comparison with coeval sequences from SW Africa. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 294:239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertolino SRL, Zimmermann U, Sattler F (2007) Mineralogy and geochemistry of bottom sediments from water reservoirs in the vicinity of Córdoba, Argentina: environmental and health constraints. Appl Clay Sci 36:206–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco G, Rajesh HR, Gaucher C, Germs GJB, Chemale F Jr (2009) Provenance of the Arroyo del Soldado group (Ediacaran to Cambrian, Uruguay): implications for the paleogeographic evolution of southwestern Gondwana. Precambrian Res 171:57–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borg G, Armstrong R (2002) Isotopic SHRIMP age dating of zircons from igneous basement and rhyolitic cover rocks at Skorpion, Southern Namibia. 11th Symposium of IAGOD and GEOCONGRESS, Windhuk, 4 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. Borg G, Kärner K, Buxton M, Armstrong R, Van Der Merwe SW (2003) Geology of the Skorpion zinc deposit, southern Namibia. Econ Geol 98:749–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvert SE, Pedersen TF (1993) Geochemistry of recent oxic and anoxic marine sediments: Implications for the geological record. Mar Geol 113:67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dobrzinski N, Bahlburg H, Strauss H, Zhang Q (2004) Geochemical climate proxies applied to the Neoproterozoic glacial succession on the Yangtze Platform, South China. In: Jenkins G, McMenamin M, Sohl L, McKay C (eds) The extreme proterozoic: geology, geochemistry and climate. American Geophysical Union Monograph Series, vol 146, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  11. Fölling PG (2000) Chemostratigraphic correlation and Pb-Pb dating of carbonate sequences in the external Gariep Belt and Kango Inlier of the Saldania Belt in Namibia and South Africa. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Capetown, Capetown, pp 1–251Google Scholar
  12. Fölling PG, Frimmel HE (2002) Chemostratigraphic correlation of carbonate successions in the Gariep and Saldania Belts, Namibia and South Africa. Basin Res 13:1–37Google Scholar
  13. Fralick P (2003) Geochemistry of clastic sedimentary rocks: ratio techniques. In: Lentz DR (ed) Geochemistry of sediments and sedimentary rocks: evolutionary Considerations to Mineral-Deposit-Forming Environments. Geol. Assoc. Can. Spec. Paper, vol 4, pp 85–104Google Scholar
  14. Frimmel HE (2000) The Pan-African Gariep Belt in southwestern Namibia and western South Africa. Commun Geol Surv Namibia 12:197–209Google Scholar
  15. Frimmel HE (2008) An evaporitic facies in Neoproterozoic post-glacial carbonates: the Gifberg Group, South Africa. Gondwana Res 13:453–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frimmel HE (2009) Trace element distribution in Neoproterozoic carbonates as palaeoenvironmental indicator. Chem Geol 258:338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frimmel HE, Fölling PG (2004) Late Vendian Closure of the Adamaster Ocean: timing of tectonic inversion and syn-orogenic sedimentation in the Gariep Basin. Gondwana Res 7:685–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frimmel HE, Klötzli U, Siegfried P (1996) New Pb-Pb single zircon age constraints on the timing of the Neoproterozoic glaciation and continental break-up in Namibia. J Geol 104:459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frimmel HE, Zartman RE, Spaeth A (2001) The Richtersveld igneous complex, South Africa; U-Pb zircon and geochemical evidence for the beginning of Neoproterozoic continental breakup. J Geol 109:493–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frimmel HE, Fölling PG, Eriksson P (2002) Neoproterozoic tectonic and climatic evolution recorded in the Gariep Belt, Namibia and South Africa. Basin Res 14:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaucher C, Sprechmann P (2009) Neoproterozoic acritarch evolution. In: Gaucher C, Sial AN, Halverson GP, Frimmel HE (eds) Neoproterozoic-Cambrian tectonics, global change and evolution: a focus on southwestern Gondwana. Developments in Precambrian Geology, vol 16, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  22. Gaucher C, Frimmel HE, Germs GJB (2005) Organic-walled microfossils and biostratigraphy of the upper Port Nolloth Group (Namibia): implications for latest Neoproterozoic glaciations. Geol Mag 142:539–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Germs GJB (1974) The Nama Group in South West Africa and its relationship to the Pan African geosyncline. J Geol 82:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Germs GJB (1983) Implications of sedimentary facies and depositional environmental analysis of the Nama Group in South West Africa/Namibia. In: Miller RMcG (ed) The evolution of the Damara Orogen of South West Africa/Namibia. Geological Society of South Africa, Spec. Publ., vol 11, pp 89–114Google Scholar
  25. Germs GJB (1995) The Neoproterozoic of southwestern Africa, with emphasis on platform stratigraphy and paleontology. Precambrian Res 73:137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Germs GJB, Gresse PG (1991) The foreland basin of the Damara and Gariep orogens in Namaqualand and southern Namibia: stratigraphic correlations and basin dynamics. S Afr J Geol 94:159–169Google Scholar
  27. Gray DR, Foster DA, Ben Goscombe B, Passchier CW, Trouw RAW (2006) 40Ar/39Ar thermochronology of the Pan-African Damara Orogen, Namibia, with implications for tectonothermal and geodynamic evolution. Precambr Res 150:49–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gresse PG, von Veh MW, Frimmel HE (2006) Namibian (Neoproterozoic) to Early Cambrian Sucessions. In: Johnson MR, Anhaeusser CR, Thomas, RJ (eds) The geology of South Africa. Council of Geoscience, pp 395–420, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  29. Grey K, Calvert CR (2007) Correlating the Ediacaran of Australia. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 286:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grey K, Walter MR, Calver CR (2003) Neoproterozoic biotic diversification: snowball earth or aftermath of the Acraman impact? Geology 31:459–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halverson GP, Dudas FO, Maloof AC, Bowring SA (2007) Evolution of the Sr-87/Sr-86 composition of Neoproterozoic seawater. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 256(3–4):103–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halverson GP, Wade BP, Hurtgen MT, Barovich KM (2010) Neoproterozoic chemostratigraphy. Precam Res (in press)Google Scholar
  33. Hoffman PF, Li ZX (2009) A palaeogeographic context for Neoproterozoic glaciation; palaeogeography, palaeoclimatology. Palaeoecology 277:158–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson SE, Pearson NJ, Griffin WL, Belousova EA (2004) The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to in situ U–Pb zircon geochronology. Chem Geol 211:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knoll A (2003) Life on a young planet: the first three Billion years of evolution on earth. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 1–277Google Scholar
  36. Kröner A, Rankama K (1972) Late Precambrian glaciogenic sedimentary rocks in southern Africa: a compilation with definitions and correlations. Precambrian Res Unit Univ Cape Town Bull 11:1–37Google Scholar
  37. Lacassie JP, Hervé F, Roser B (2006) Sedimentary provenance study of the post-Early Permian to pre-Early Cretaceous metasedimentary Duque de York Complex, Chile. Rev Geol Chile 33:199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martin M (1965) The Precambrian geology of South West Africa and Namaqualand. The Precambrian Research Unit, University of Cape Town, pp 1–159Google Scholar
  39. Martin MW, Grazhdankin DV, Bowring SA, Evans DAD, Fedonkin MA, Kirschvink JL (2000) Age of Neoproterozoic bilatarian body and trace fossils, White Sea, Russia: implications for metazoan evolution. Science 288:841–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McLennan SM, Taylor SR, McCulloch MT, Maynard JB (1990) Geochemical and Nd-Sr isotopic composition of deep-sea turbidites: crustal evolution and plate tectonic associations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 54:2015–2050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McLennan SM, Bock B, Hemming SR, Horrowitz JA, Lev SM, McDaniel DK (2003) The roles of provenance and sedimentary processes in the geochemistry of sedimentary rocks. In: Lentz RD (ed) Geochemistry of sediments and sedimentary rocks: evolutionary considerations to mineral-deposit-forming environments. Geological Association of Canada, GEOText, vol 4, pp 7–38Google Scholar
  42. McLennan SM, Taylor SR, Hemming SR (2006) Composition, differentiation, and evolution of continental crust: Constraints from sedimentary rocks and heat flow. In: Brown M, Rushmer T (eds) Evolution and Differentiation of the Continental Crust. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 92–134Google Scholar
  43. McMillan MD (1968) The geology of the Witputs-Sendlingsdrif area. Precambrian Res Unit Univ Cape Town 4:1–177Google Scholar
  44. Menzies J, van der Meer JM, Rose J (2006) Till—as a glacial ‘tectomict’, its internal architecture, and the development of a ‘typing’ method for till differentiation. Geomorphology 75:172–200Google Scholar
  45. Murton JB, Bateman MD (2007) Syngenetic Sand Veins and Anti-Syngenetic Sand Wedges, Tuktoyaktuk Coastlands, Western Arctic Canada; Permafrost and Periglac. Process 18:33–47Google Scholar
  46. Nesbitt HW, Young YM (1982) Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature 299:715–717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicoll G, Straathof G, Tait J, Lo K, Ousmane N, El Moctar Dahmada M, Berndt J, Key R (2010) Provenance analysis and tectonic setting of the Neoproterozoic sediments within the Taoudeni Basin, Northern Mauritania. Geophys Res Abstr 12:EGU2010-7094-2Google Scholar
  48. Schermerhorn LJG, Stanton WI (1963) Tilloids in the West Congo geosyncline. Q J Geol Soc Lond 119:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schneider N (1993) Das lumineszenzaktive Strukturinventar von Quarzphänokristen in Rhyolithen; Göttinger Arbeiten zur Geologie und Paläontologie 60:1–81Google Scholar
  50. Sømme TO, Helland-Hansen W, Martinsen OJ, Thurmond JB (2009) Relationships between morphological and sedimentological parameters in source-to-sink systems: a basis for predicting semi-quantitative characteristics in subsurface systems. Basin Res 21:361–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stanistreet IG, Kukla PA, Henry G (1991) Sedimentary basinal responses to a Late Precambrian Wilson cycle: the Damara Orogen and Nama Foreland, Namibia. J Afr Earth Sci 13:141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor SR, McLennan SM (1985) The continental crust: its composition and evolution. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 1–298Google Scholar
  53. Van Staden A, Naidoo T, Zimmermann U, Germs GJB (2006) Provenance analysis of selected clastic rocks in Neoproterozoic to lower Palaeozoic successions of southern Africa from the Gariep Belt and the Kango Inlier. S Afr J Geol 109:215–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Staden A, Zimmermann U, Gutzmer J, Germs GJB, Chemale F Jr (2010a) Detrital zircon dating and sedimentology of two Neoproterozoic diamictites from the Gariep belt (Namibia) and consequences for correlation. NGF Vinterkonferansen 11-13.1. 2010 OsloGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Staden A, Zimmermann U, Gutzmer J, Chemale F Jr, Germs GJB (2010b) First regional correlation of Lower Paleozoic successions from Argentina and South Africa using glacial diamictite deposits and its consequences for the regional geology. J Geol Soc Lond 167:217–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Vliet-Lanoe B (1989) Dynamics and extent of the Weichselian permafrost in Western Europe (substage 5e to stage 1). Q Int 3(4):109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vandenberghe J, Zhiju C, Liang Z, Wei Z (2004) Thermal-contraction-crack Networks as Evidence for Late-Pleistocene Permafrost in Inner Mongolia, China. Permafrost Periglac Process 15:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiedenbeck M, Alle P, Corfu F, Griffin WL, Meier M, Oberli F, Von Quadt A, Roddick JC, Spiegel W (1995) Three natural zircon standards for U-Th-Pb and Lu-Hf, trace element and REE analyses. Geostand Newsl 19:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Winchester JA, Floyd PA (1977) Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements. Chem Geol 20:325–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young GM, Minter WEL, Theron JN (2000) Geochemistry and palaeogeography of upper Ordovician glaciogenic sedimentary rocks in the Table Mountain Group, South Africa. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 214:323–345Google Scholar
  61. Zhang S, Jiang G, Zhang J, Song B, Kennedy MJ, Christie-Blick N (2005) U-Pb sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe ages from the Doushantuo Formation in south china: constraints on late Neoproterozoic glaciations. Geology 33:473–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmermann U, Chemale F Jr, Dussin IA, Justino D, Germs GJB, Blanco G (2008) Detrital zircon record of the Nama Group: implications for the Neoproterozoic to lower Palaeozoic palaeogeography of southern Africa. Actas VI South American Symposium on Isotope Geology, short paper, Bariloche (CD-ROM)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Udo Zimmermann
    • 1
  • Jennifer Tait
    • 2
  • Quentin G. Crowley
    • 3
    • 4
  • Vanessa Pashley
    • 3
  • Gijs Straathof
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Petroleum Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of StavangerStavangerNorway
  2. 2.School of GeosciencesGrant InstituteEdinburghUK
  3. 3.NERC Isotope Geosciences LaboratoryNottinghamUK
  4. 4.Department of Geology, School of Natural SciencesTrinity CollegeDublin 2Ireland

Personalised recommendations