International Journal of Earth Sciences

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 67–82 | Cite as

Assessment of three temperature reconstruction methods in the virtual reality of a climate simulation

  • Hans von Storch
  • Eduardo Zorita
  • Fidel González-Rouco
Original Paper


The performance of statistical climate reconstruction methods in the pre-instrumental period is uncertain, as they are calibrated in a short instrumental period but applied to much longer reconstructions time spans. Here, the virtual reality created by a climate simulation of the past millennium with the model ECHO-G is used as a test bed of three methods to reconstruct the annual Northern Hemisphere temperature. The methods are Composite plus Scaling, the inverse regression method of Mann et al. (Nature 392:779–787, 1998) and a direct principal-components regression method. The testing methodology is based on the construction of pseudo-proxies derived from the climate model output, the application of each of these methods to pseudo-proxy timeseries, and the comparison of their result with the simulated mean temperature. Different structures of the noise have been used to construct pseudo-proxies, ranging from the simulated grid-point precipitation. Also, one sparse and one denser pseudo-proxy network, co-located with two real networks, have been considered. All three methods underestimate the simulated variations of the Northern Hemisphere temperature, but the Composite plus Scaling method clearly displays a better performance and is robust against the different noise models and network size. The most relevant factor determining the skill of the reconstruction appears to be the network size, whereas the different noise models tend to yield similar results.


Paleoclimate Past millennium Reconstruction methods Pseudoproxies 



We thank A. Bunde for his help in generating synthetic timeseries with long-range-correlation. The work of H.v.S. and E.Z. is part of the European project Millennium European Climate (contract number 017008, GOCE). F.G-R was partially funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia through grant REN-2002-04584-CLI.


  1. Ammann CM, Wahl ER (2007) The importance of geophysical context in statistical evaluations of climate reconstructions procedures. Clim Change 85:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battle M, Bender M, Sowers T, Tans PP, Butler JH, Elkins JW, Ellis JT, Conway T, Zhang N, Lang P, Clarke AD (1996) Atmospheric gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from firn and the South Pole. Nature 383:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buerger G, Cubasch U (2005) Are multiproxy reconstructions robust? Geophys Res Lett 32:L23711. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024155
  4. Briffa KR, Osborn TJ (2002) Blowing hot and cold. Science 292:662–663Google Scholar
  5. Bunde A, Eichner JF, Kantelhardt JW, Havlin S (2005) Long-term memory: a natural mechanism for the clustering of extreme events and anomalous residual times in climate records. Phys Rev Lett 94:048701-1–048701-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bürger G, Fast I, Cubasch U (2006) Climate reconstruction by regression-32 variations on a theme. Tellus 58A:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohn TA, Lins HF(2005) Nature’s style: naturally trendy. Geophys Res Lett 32:L23402. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crowley TJ (2000) Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years. Science 289:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowley TJ, Lowery TS (2000) How warm was the medieval warm period?. Ambio 29:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Esper J, Cook ER, Schweingruber FH (2002) Low-frequency signals in long tree-ring chronologies for reconstructing past temperature variability. Science 295:2250–2253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Esper J, Frank D, RJS Wilson, KR Briffa (2005) Effect of scaling and regression on reconstructed temperature amplitude for the past millennium. Geophys Res Lett 32:L07711. doi: 10.1029/2004GL021236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Langenfelds RL, Francey RJ, Barnola J-M, Morgan VI (1996) Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO 2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn. J Geophys Res 101 D2:4115–4128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etheridge DM, Steele LP, Francey RJ, Langenfelds RL (1998) Atmospheric methane between 1000 A.D. and present: evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability. J Geophys Res 103 D13:15,979–15,994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedlingstein P, et al (2006) Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis, results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Clim 19:3337–3353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. González-Rouco JF, Beltrami H, Zorita E, von Storch H (2006) Simulation and inversion of borehole temperature profiles in surrogate climates: spatial distribution and surface coupling. Geophys Res Lett 33:L01703. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goosse H, Crowley TJ, Zorita E, Ammann CM, Renssen H, Driesschaert E (2005) Modelling the climate of the last millennium: what causes the differences between simulations? Geophys Res Lett 32:L06710. doi: 10.1029/2005GL022368 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granger CWJ, Newbold P (1974) Spurious regression in econometrics. J Econom 74:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hegerl GC, Crowley TJC, Allen M, Hyde WT, Pollack HN, Smeardon J, Zorita E (2007) Detection of human influence in a new validated 1500 year temperature reconstruction. J Clim 20:650–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoskings J (1984) Modelling persistence in hydrological timeseries using fractional differencing. Water Resour Res 20:1898–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huybers P (2005) Comment on "Hockey sticks, principal components and spurious significance" by S. McIntyre and R. McKitrick. Geophys Res Lett 32:L20705. doi: 101029/2005GL023395 Google Scholar
  21. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones PD, Mann ME (2004) Climate over the past millennia. Rev Geophys 42:RG2002. doi: 10.1029/2003RG000143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones PD, Briffa KR, Barnett TP, Tett SFB (1998) High-resolution paleoclimatic records for the last millennium: interpretation, integration and comparison with General Circulation Model control-run temperatures. Holocene 8:455–471Google Scholar
  24. Jones PD, Briffa KR, Osborn TJ (2003) Changes in Northern Hemisphere annual cycle: implications for paleoclimatology. J Geophys Res 108(D18):4588. doi: 10.1029/2003JD003695 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juckes MN, Allen MR, Briffa KR, Esper J, Hegerl GC, Moberg A, Osborn TJ, Weber SL (2007) Millennial temperature reconstruction, intercomparison and evaluation. Clim Past 3:591–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koutsoyiannis D (2003) Climate change, the Hurst phenomenon and hydrological statistics. Hydrol Sci 48:3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Küttel M, Luterbacher J, Zorita E, Xoplaki E, Riedwyl N, Wanner H (2007) Testing a European winter surface temperature reconstruction in a surrogate climate. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07710. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027907
  28. Luterbacher J, Dietrich D, Xoplaki E, Grosjean M, Wanner H (2004) European seasonal and annual temperature variability, trends and extremes since 1500 A.D. Science 303:1499–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Makse HA, Havlin S, Schwartz M, Stanley HE (1996) Method for generating long-range correlations for large systems. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 53:5445–5499Google Scholar
  30. Mann ME, Rutherford S (2002) Climate reconstructions using pseudoproxies. Geophys Res Lett 29:139-1–139-4. doi: 10.1029/2001GL014554 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK (1998) Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nature 392:779–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK (1999) Northern temperature over the past millennium:inferences, uncertainties and limitations. Geophys Res Lett 26:75–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK (2004) Corrigendum: global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nature 430:105–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mann ME, Rutherford S, Wahl E, Ammann C (2005) Testing the fidelity of methods used in proxy-based reconstructions of past climate. J Clim 18:4097–4107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mann ME, Rutherford S, Wahl E, Ammann C (2007) Robustness of proxy-based climate field reconstructions. J Geophys Res 112:D12109. doi: 10.10292006JD008272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Min S-K, Legutke S, Hense A, Kwon W-T (2005) Internal variability in a 1000-year control simulation with the coupled climate model ECHO-G II. El Niño Southern Oscillation and North Atlantic Oscillation. Tellus 57A:622–640Google Scholar
  37. Moberg A, Sonechkin DM, Holmgren K, Datsenko N, Kart’en W (2005) High variable Northern Hemisphere temperatures reconstructed from low and high resolution proxy data. Nature 433:613–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. National Research Council (2006) Surface temperature reconstructions for the last 2,000 years, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 141 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Osborn TJ, Raper SCB, Briffa KR (2006) Simulated climate change during the last 1000 years: comparing the ECHO-G general circulation model with the MAGGIC simple climate model. Clim Dyn 27:185–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roeckner E, Bengtsson L, Feichter J, Lelieveld J, Rodhe H (1999) Transient climate change simulations with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM including the tropospheric sulfur cycle. J Clim 12:3004–3032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rutherford S, Mann ME, Osborn TJ, Bradly RS, Briffa KR, Hughes MK, Jones PD (2005) Proxy-based reconstruction Northern Hemisphere surface temperature reconstructions: sensitivity to method, prediction network, target season and target domain. J Clim 18:2308–2329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Scheffer M, Brovkin V, Cox M (2006) Positive feedback between global warming and atmospheric CO2 concentrations inferred from past climate change. Geophy Res Lett 33:L10702. doi: 10.1029/2005/GL025044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schneider T (2001) Analysis of incomplete climate data: estimation of mean values and covariance matrices and imputation of missing values. J Clim 14:854–871Google Scholar
  44. von Storch H, Zorita E, Jones J , Dimitriev Y, González-Rouco JF, Tett SFB (2004) Reconstructing past climate from noise data. Science 306:679–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wahl ER, Ammann CM (2007) Robustness of the Mann, Bradly, Hughes reconstructions of northern hemisphere surface temperatures: examination of criticism based on the nature and processing of proxy climate evidence. Clim Change 85:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yule GU (1926) Why do we sometimes get nonsense correlation between timeseries? J R Stat Soc 89:1–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans von Storch
    • 1
  • Eduardo Zorita
    • 1
  • Fidel González-Rouco
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Coastal ResearchGKSS Research CenterGeesthachtGermany
  2. 2.Universidad ComplutenseMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations