Assessment of three temperature reconstruction methods in the virtual reality of a climate simulation
- 209 Downloads
The performance of statistical climate reconstruction methods in the pre-instrumental period is uncertain, as they are calibrated in a short instrumental period but applied to much longer reconstructions time spans. Here, the virtual reality created by a climate simulation of the past millennium with the model ECHO-G is used as a test bed of three methods to reconstruct the annual Northern Hemisphere temperature. The methods are Composite plus Scaling, the inverse regression method of Mann et al. (Nature 392:779–787, 1998) and a direct principal-components regression method. The testing methodology is based on the construction of pseudo-proxies derived from the climate model output, the application of each of these methods to pseudo-proxy timeseries, and the comparison of their result with the simulated mean temperature. Different structures of the noise have been used to construct pseudo-proxies, ranging from the simulated grid-point precipitation. Also, one sparse and one denser pseudo-proxy network, co-located with two real networks, have been considered. All three methods underestimate the simulated variations of the Northern Hemisphere temperature, but the Composite plus Scaling method clearly displays a better performance and is robust against the different noise models and network size. The most relevant factor determining the skill of the reconstruction appears to be the network size, whereas the different noise models tend to yield similar results.
KeywordsPaleoclimate Past millennium Reconstruction methods Pseudoproxies
We thank A. Bunde for his help in generating synthetic timeseries with long-range-correlation. The work of H.v.S. and E.Z. is part of the European project Millennium European Climate (contract number 017008, GOCE). F.G-R was partially funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia through grant REN-2002-04584-CLI.
- Buerger G, Cubasch U (2005) Are multiproxy reconstructions robust? Geophys Res Lett 32:L23711. doi: 10.1029/2005GL024155
- Briffa KR, Osborn TJ (2002) Blowing hot and cold. Science 292:662–663Google Scholar
- IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Jones PD, Briffa KR, Barnett TP, Tett SFB (1998) High-resolution paleoclimatic records for the last millennium: interpretation, integration and comparison with General Circulation Model control-run temperatures. Holocene 8:455–471Google Scholar
- Küttel M, Luterbacher J, Zorita E, Xoplaki E, Riedwyl N, Wanner H (2007) Testing a European winter surface temperature reconstruction in a surrogate climate. Geophys Res Lett 34:L07710. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027907
- Makse HA, Havlin S, Schwartz M, Stanley HE (1996) Method for generating long-range correlations for large systems. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 53:5445–5499Google Scholar
- Min S-K, Legutke S, Hense A, Kwon W-T (2005) Internal variability in a 1000-year control simulation with the coupled climate model ECHO-G II. El Niño Southern Oscillation and North Atlantic Oscillation. Tellus 57A:622–640Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2006) Surface temperature reconstructions for the last 2,000 years, National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 141 ppGoogle Scholar
- Schneider T (2001) Analysis of incomplete climate data: estimation of mean values and covariance matrices and imputation of missing values. J Clim 14:854–871Google Scholar