Advertisement

International Journal of Earth Sciences

, Volume 97, Issue 2, pp 205–226 | Cite as

Spherical harmonic analysis of earth’s conductive heat flow

  • V. M. HamzaEmail author
  • R. R. Cardoso
  • C. F. Ponte Neto
Original Paper

Abstract

A reappraisal of the international heat flow database has been carried out and the corrected data set was employed in spherical harmonic analysis of the conductive component of global heat flow. Procedures used prior to harmonic analysis include analysis of the heat flow data and determination of representative mean values for a set of discretized area elements of the surface of the earth. Estimated heat flow values were assigned to area elements for which experimental data are not available. However, no corrections were made to account for the hypothetical effects of regional-scale convection heat transfer in areas of oceanic crust. New sets of coefficients for 12° spherical harmonic expansion were calculated on the basis of the revised and homogenized data set. Maps derived on the basis of these coefficients reveal several new features in the global heat flow distribution. The magnitudes of heat flow anomalies of the ocean ridge segments are found to have mean values of less than 150 mW/m2. Also, the mean global heat flow values for the raw and binned data are found to fall in the range of 56–67 mW/m2, down by nearly 25% compared to the previous estimate of 1993, but similar to earlier assessments based on raw data alone. To improve the spatial resolution of the heat flow anomalies, the spherical harmonic expansions have been extended to higher degrees. Maps derived using coefficients for 36° harmonic expansion have allowed identification of new features in regional heat flow fields of several oceanic and continental segments. For example, lateral extensions of heat flow anomalies of active spreading centers have been outlined with better resolution than was possible in earlier studies. Also, the characteristics of heat flow variations in oceanic crust away from ridge systems are found to be typical of conductive cooling of the lithosphere, there being little need to invoke the hypothesis of unconfined hydrothermal circulation on regional scales. Calculations of global conductive heat loss, compatible with the observational data set, are found to fall in the range of 29–34 TW, nearly 25% less than the 1993 estimate, which rely on one-dimensional conductive cooling models.

Keywords

Global heat flow Spherical harmonic analysis Conduction heat transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The second author of this paper has been recipient of a Masters Degree scholarship granted by Coordenadoria de Aperfeiçoamento de Pesquisa e Ensino Superior (CAPES), during the period of 2004–2006. The authors thank Anne Hofmeister (Washington University) for fruitful exchange of information on assessment of global heat flow. Paul Shen (University of Western Ontario) and Vladimir Shukovski (University of São Paulo) provided helpful comments on the subject matter of spherical harmonic representation. Thanks are also due to Iris Escobar (Observatório Nacional) for institutional support.

References

  1. Akaku K (1988) Geochemistry of mineral deposition from geothermal waters: deposition processes of common minerals found in various geothermal fields and case study in the Fushime geothermal field. J Jpn Geothermal Energy Assoc 25:154–171Google Scholar
  2. Alexandrino CH, Hamza VM (2005) A simple semi-analytical model for estimating heat flow variations in hydrothermal areas. IASPEI Regional Assembly, SantiagomGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker ET, Chen YJ, Morgan JP (1996) The relationship between near-axis hydrothermal cooling and the spreading rate of mid-ocean ridges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 142:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balling N, Haenel R, Ungemach P, Vasseur G, Whieldon J (1981) Preliminary guidelines for heat flow density determination. Energy Commission of the European Communities, Luxemburg, Catalogue No. CD-ND-81-068-EN-C, pp 32Google Scholar
  5. Becker K, Davis E (2003) New evidence for age variation and scale effects of permeabilities of young oceanic crust from borehole thermal and pressure measurements. Earth Planet Sci Lett 201:499–508Google Scholar
  6. Becker K, Fisher A (2000) Permeability of upper oceanic basement on the eastern flank of the Endeavor Ridge determined with drill-string packer experiments. J Geophys Res 105(B1):897–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bevington PR (1969) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 1–336Google Scholar
  8. Birch F (1954) The present state of geothermal investigations. Geophysics 19:645–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blakely RJ (1995) Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryant WR, Bennett RH, Katherman CE (1981) Shear strength, consolidation, porosity and permeability of oceanic sediments. In: Emiliani C (eds) The oceanic lithosphere. Wiley, New York, pp 1555–1616Google Scholar
  11. Cardoso RR (2006) Analytic representation of the global thermal field by the method of spherical harmonics (in Portuguese), Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Observatório Nacional–MCT, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  12. Cardoso RR, Hamza VM (2006) Crustal heat flow variations of in the Equatorial Atlantic: implications for geothermal structure of NE Brazil. In: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, Natal, p 6Google Scholar
  13. Cardoso RR, Hamza VM (2005) A comparative analysis of numerical and harmonic representations of conductive heat flow in the South American and Australian continents (Abstract). IASPEI Regional Assembly, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardoso RR, Ponte Neto CF, Hamza VM (2005) A reappraisal of global heat flow data. In: Proceedings of the 9th international congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, Salvador, p 6Google Scholar
  15. Chapman S, Bartels J (1940) Geomagnetism. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman DS, Pollack HN (1975) Global heat flow: a new look. Earth Planet Sci Lett 28:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng P (1978) Heat transfer in geothermal systems. Adv Heat Transf 14:1–105Google Scholar
  18. Cheng P, Lau KH (1974) Steady state free convection in an unconfined geothermal reservoir. J Geophys Res 79:4425–4431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Combarnous MA, Bories SA (1975) Hydrothermal convection in saturated porous media. Adv Hydroscience 10:231–307Google Scholar
  20. Cull JP (1982) An appraisal of Australian heat flow data. BMR J Aust Geol Geophys 7:11–21Google Scholar
  21. Cull JP, Denham D (1979) Regional variations in Australian heat flow. BMR J Aust Geol Geophys 4:1–13Google Scholar
  22. Drummond SE, Ohmoto H (1985) Chemical evolution and mineral deposition in boiling hydrothermal systems. Econ Geol 82:1–26Google Scholar
  23. Elder J (1981) Geothermal systems. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Embley RW, Chadwick W, Perfit MR, Baker ET (1991) Geology of the northern cleft segment, Juan de Fuca Ridge: recent lava flows, sea-floor spreading and the formation of megaplumes. Geology 19:771–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Everett JD (1883) Rep Brit Assoc for 1882. pp 72–90Google Scholar
  26. Fisher AT (1998) Permeability within basaltic oceanic crust. Rev Geophysics 36(2):143–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Garg SK, Kassoy DR (1981) Convective heat and mass transfer in hydrothermal systems. In: Rybach L, Muffler LJP (Eds) Geothermal systems: principles and case histories. Wiley, New York, pp 37–76Google Scholar
  28. German CR, Briem J, Chin C, Danielsen M, Holland S, James R, Jónsdóttir A, Ludford E, Moser C, Olafson J, Palmer MR, Rudinicki MD (1994) Hydrothermal activity on the Reykjanes Ridge: the Steinahóll Vent-field at 63°06′N. Earth Planet Sci Lett 121:647–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giambalvo ER, Fisher AT, Martin JT, Darty L, Lowell RP (2000) Origin of elevated sediment permeability in a hydrothermal seepage zone, eastern flank of the Juan de Fuca Ridge, and implications for transport of fluid and heat. J Geophys Res 105:913–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goyal KP, Kassoy DR (1977) A fault-zone controlled model of the Mesa anomaly. In: Proceedings of the third workshop geothermal reservoir engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, pp 209–213Google Scholar
  31. Gray WG, Oneill K, Pinder GF (1976) Simulation of heat transport in fractured, single-phase geothermal reservoirs. Summaries second workshop geothermal reservoir engineering. Stanford University, Stanford, pp 222–228Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton EL (1976) Variations of density and porosity with depth in deep-sea sediments. J Sediment Petrol 46(2):280–300Google Scholar
  33. Hamza VM, Muñoz M (1996) Heat flow map of South America. Geothermics 25(6):599–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamza VM, Verma RK (1969) Relationship of heat flow with the age of basement rocks. Bull Volcan 33:123–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hamza VM, Soares FJS, Gomes AJL, Terceros ZD (2005) Numerical and Functional representations of Regional heat flow in South America. Phys Earth Planet Inter 152:223–256Google Scholar
  36. Haymon RM, Fornari DJ, Edwards MH, Carbotte S, Wright D, Macdonald KC (1991) Hydrothermal vent distribution along the east Pacific Rise crest (9°09′–54′N) and its relationship to magmatic and tectonic processes on fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges. Earth Planet Sci Lett 104:513–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hofmeister AM, Criss RE (2005) Earth’s heat flux revised and linked to chemistry. Tectonophysics 395:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hofmeister AM, Criss RE (2006) Comment on “Estimates of heat flow from Cenozoic sea floor using global depth and age data”, by M. Wei and D. Sandwell. Tectonophysics 428:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Holst PH, Aziz K (1972) A theoretical and experimental study of natural convection in a confined porous medium. Can J Chem Eng 50:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horai K, Simmons G (1969) Spherical harmonic analysis of terrestrial heat flow. Earth Planet Sci Lett 6:386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jessop AM, Hobart MA, Sclater JG (1976) The world heat flow data collection—1975, Geothermal Series, vol 20. Earth Physics Branch, Energetic Mines and Resources, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones EJW (1999) Marine geophysics. Wiley, New York pp 1–466Google Scholar
  43. Lee WHK (1963) Heat flow data analysis. Rev Geophys 1:449–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee WHK, McDonald GJF (1963) The global variation of terrestrial heat flow. J Geophys Res 68:6481–6492Google Scholar
  45. Lee WHK, Uyeda S (1965) Review of heat flow data. In: Lee WHK (Eds) Terrestrial heat flow. Geophysical monograph series 8. AGU, Washington, pp 87–100Google Scholar
  46. Lister CRB (1972) On the thermal balance of a mid-ocean ridge. Geophys J R Astron Soc 26:515–535Google Scholar
  47. Lowell RP, Van Capellan P, Germanovich LN (1993) Silica precipitation in fractures and the evolution of permeability in hydrothermal upflow zones. Science 260:192–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lubimova EA, Von Herzen RP, Udintsev GB (1965) On heat transfer through the ocean floor. In terrestrial heat flow. In: Lee WHK (ed) Geophysical monograph series, vol 8. AGU, Washington, pp 78–86Google Scholar
  49. Lupton JE, Baker ET, Mottl MJ, Sansone FJ, Wheat CG, Resing JA, Massoth GJ, Measures CI, Feely RA (1993) Chemical and physical diversity of hydrothermal plumes along the East Pacific Rise, 8°45′–11°50′N. Geophys Res Lett 20:2913–2916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McKenzie DP (1967) Some remarks on heat flow and gravity anomalies. J Geophys Res 72:6261–6273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Meyer C, Hemley J (1967) Wall Rock Alteration. In: Barnes HL (ed) Geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp 166–235Google Scholar
  52. Murton BJ, Klinkhammer G, Becker K, Briais A, Edge D, Hayward N, Millard N, Mitchell I, Rouse I, Rudnicki M, Sayanagi K, Sloan H, Parson L (1994) Direct evidence for the distribution and occurrence of hydrothermal activity between 27° and 30°N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Earth Planet Sci Lett 125:119–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pollack HN, Hurter SJ, Johnson JR (1993) Heat flow from the earth’s interior: analysis of the global data set. Rev Geophys 31:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Polyak BG, Smirnov YA (1968) Relationship between terrestrial heat flow and tectonics of continents. Geotectonics 4:205–213 (Eng Transl)Google Scholar
  55. Ponte Neto CF, Hamza VM (2004) Estimation of errors in spherical harmonic representation of global heat flow. In: Proceedings of the regional symposium of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, São Paulo, p 6Google Scholar
  56. Pratts M (1966) The effect of horizontal fluid flow on thermally induced convection currents in porous mediums. J Geophys Res 71:4835–4838Google Scholar
  57. Ribando RJ, Torrance KE (1976) Natural convection in a porous medium: effects of confinement, variable permeability and thermal boundary conditions. J Heat Transfer 98:42–48Google Scholar
  58. Sclater JG, Jaupart C, Galson D (1980) The heat flow through oceanic and continental crust and heat loss of the Earth. Rev Geophys 18:269–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Snelgrove SH, Forster CB (1996) Impact of seafloor sediment permeability and thickness on off-axis hydrothermal circulation: juan de Fuca ridge eastern flank. J Geophys Res 101:2915–2925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stein C, Stein S (1992) A model for the global variation in oceanic depth and heat flow with lithospheric age. Nature 359:123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Turcotte DL, Schubert G (1982) Geodynamics application of continuum physics to geological problems. Wiley, New York, pp 1–450Google Scholar
  62. Von Herzen R, Davis EE, Fisher AT, Stein CA, Pollack HN (2005) Comments on “Earth’s heat flux revised and linked to chemistry” by A.M. Hoffmeister and R.E. Criss. Tectonophysics 409:193–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wei M, Sandwell D (2006) Estimates of heat flow from Cenozoic seafloor using global depth and age data. Tectonophysics 417:325–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wessel P, Smith WHF (1998) New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79(47):579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Williams DL, Von Herzen RP, Sclater JG, Anderson RN (1974) The Galapagos spreading center: lithospheric cooling and hydrothermal circulation. Geophys J R Astron Soc 38:587–608Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. M. Hamza
    • 1
    Email author
  • R. R. Cardoso
    • 1
  • C. F. Ponte Neto
    • 1
  1. 1.Observatório NacionalRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations