Phytoplankton, protozooplankton and nutrient dynamics in the Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea) in 2002–2003 during the German GLOBEC Project
- 156 Downloads
From March 2002 to until April 2003 we investigated the seasonal nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics in the central Bornholm Basin (Baltic Sea) within the framework of the German GLOBEC Project. We choose a nested approach consisting of vertical fluorescence profiles, phytoplankton counts and nutrient analyses. The Fluoroprobe (MultiProbe, BBE Moldaenke) is capable of distinguishing four algal groups (Cryptophyceae, Cyanophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae + Dinophyceae). Winter nutrient concentrations were about 5 μM NO3 and 0.5 μM PO4 in the central Basin. The spring phytoplankton bloom was dominated by the diatom Skeletonema sp. and reached a maximum of about 270 μg C/l before the onset of the seasonal stratification. Protozooplankton was dominated by the Mesodinium rubrum (a phototrophic ciliate = Myrionecta rubra) and reached a maximum biomass of about 200–300 μg C/l about 2 weeks after the demise of the diatom spring bloom. During summer, the water column was stratified and a subsurface maximum developed near the thermocline consisting of Bacillariophyceae, Cryptophycea and other phototrophic flagellates. Phytoplankton and protozooplankton biomass was generally low. Nutrient concentrations point towards a nitrogen limitation during this period. The stratification period ended during September and surface nutrient concentrations increased again. Protozooplankton reached a second maximum during September. With the Fluoroprobe small scale structures in the plankton community could be detected like a subsurface Cryptophyceae maximum near the thermocline that however, could not be confirmed by cell counts. The chlorophyll a estimate of the Fluoroprobe was in good agreement with the phytoplankton biomass estimated from counts. We conclude that only by combining modern sensing technology with microscopy, the small-scale dynamics and taxonomic spectrum of the plankton can be fully captured.
KeywordsPhytoplankton Nutrients Fluorescence Fluoroprobe Baltic GLOBEC
We thank all participants of the many GLOBEC-Cruises for their help in collecting the samples. Comments by two reviewers considerably improved the manuscript. This study was funded through the GLOBEC-Germany project (03F0320C) by the German Federal Ministry of Science and Education (BMBF).
- Alheit J (2004) The GLOBEC-Germany Project. Int Globec Newsl 10:9Google Scholar
- Beutler M, Wiltshire KH, Meyer B, Moldaenke C, Dau H (2001) In situ profiles of phytoplankton: algal composition and biomass determined fluorometrically. In: Ninth international conference on harmful algal blooms, Hobart (Australia), pp 202–205Google Scholar
- Dickmann M (2005) Feeding ecology of sprat (Sprattus sprattus L.) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus W.) larvae in the Baltic Sea and in the North Sea. PhD Thesis, University of Rostock, p 93Google Scholar
- Edler L (1979) Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. Phytoplankton and chlorophyll. Baltic Mar Biol 5:1–38Google Scholar
- Hällfors G (2004) Checklist of Baltic Sea phytoplankton species: including some heterotrophic protistan groups. Baltic Sea environment proceedings. Baltic Environmental Protection Commission-HELCOM, p 95Google Scholar
- Laamanen MJ, Forsström L, Sivonen K (2002) Diversity of Aphanizomenon populations (cyanobacteria) on a Baltic Sea salinity gradient—only one ITS1-S genotype persits in the Baltic Sea. In: Laamanen MJ (ed) Genetic and species diversity of planktonic cyanobacteria in the northern Baltic Sea. Contributions of the Finnish Inst. of Marine Research, Helsinki, vol. 4, Part IV, p 14Google Scholar
- Malzahn AM (2006) Larval fish dynamics in changing environments. PhD Thesis, University of Kiel, p 98Google Scholar
- Sommer F (2003) A comparison of the impact of major mesozooplankton taxa on marine, brackish and freshwater phytoplankton during summer. PhD Thesis, University of Kiel, Berichte aus dem Institut für Meereskunde an der Universität Kiel, No. 329, p 91Google Scholar
- Utermöhl H (1958) Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplanktonmethodik. Mitt Int Verh Theor Angew Limnol 9:1–38Google Scholar
- von Bodungen B, von Bröckel K, Smetacek V, Zeitschel B (1981) Growth and sedimentation of the phytoplankton spring bloom in the Bornholm Basin. Kieler Meeresforschung Sonderheft 5:49–60Google Scholar
- Wasmund N, Pollehne F, Postel L, Siegel H, Zettler ML (2003) Assessment of the biological state of the Baltic Sea in 2002 (in German). Meereswiss Ber 56:1–78Google Scholar