Multimedia Systems

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 621–631 | Cite as

QoE assessment of fairness in networked game with olfaction: influence of time it takes for smell to reach player

  • Yutaka Ishibashi
  • Sosuke Hoshino
  • Qi Zeng
  • Norishige Fukushima
  • Shinji Sugawara
Special Issue Paper

Abstract

In this paper, we carry out QoE (Quality of Experience) assessment of fairness between players in a networked game with olfaction. In the assessment, we investigate the influence of the time it takes for a smell to reach a player on the fairness. As the networked game, we deal with a fruit harvesting game in which two players play in a 3D virtual space, and we change the time it takes for a smell to reach a player by generating constant delays at two terminals. As a result, for example, we illustrate that the fairness is hardly damaged when the constant delays are smaller than about 500 ms.

Keywords

Networked game Olfaction QoE Fairness Assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Nakamoto, T., Nimsuk, M., Wyszynski, B., Takushima, H., Kinoshita, M., Cho, N.: Experiment on teleolfaction using odor sensing system and olfactory display synchronous with visual information. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT), pp. 85–92 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yanagida, Y., Kawato, S., Noma, H., Tomono, A., Tetsutani, N.: Projection based olfactory display with nose tracking. In: Proceedings of IEEE, Virtual Reality, pp. 43–50 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Tominaga, K., Honda, S., Ohsawa, T., Shigeno, H., Okada, K., Matsushita, Y.: Friend park—expression of the wind and the scent on virtual space. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 507–515 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mochizuki, A., Amada, T., Sawa, S., Takeda, T., Motoyashiki, S., Kohyama, K., Imura, M., Chihara, K.: Fragra: A visual-olfactory VR game. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH Sketches, pp. 123 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siio, I., Hamada, R., Mima, N.: Kitchen of the future and applications. Lecture notes in computer science, pp. 946–955. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, P., Ishibashi, Y., Fukushima, N., Sugawara, S.: QoE assessment of olfactory media in remote ikebana with haptic media. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2012 International Communications Quality and Reliability (CQR), Workshop, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, P., Ishibashi, Y., Fukushima, N., Sugawara, S.: Quality of experience assessment of dynamic output timing control of fragrance in networked virtual environment. J. Inst. Image Inf. Telev. Eng. 66(12), J495–J499 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoshino, S., Ishibashi, Y., Fukushima, N., Sugawara, S.: QoE assessment in olfactory and haptic media transmission: Influence of inter-stream synchronization error. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2011 International Communications Quality and Reliability (CQR), Workshop (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ademoye, O., Ghinea, G.: Synchronization of olfaction-enhanced multimedia. IEEE Trans. Multimed. 11(3), 561–565 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murray, N., Qiao, Y., Lee, B., Muntean, G.: Subjective evaluation of olfactory and visual media synchronization. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Multimedia Conference (MMSys), pp. 162–171 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ITU-T Rec. G.100/P.10 Amendment 1: New appendix I- Definition of quality of experience (QoE). International Telecommunication Union (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ishibashi, Y., Kaneoka, H.: Fairness among game players in networked haptic environments: influence of network latency. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME) (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brun, J., Safaei, F., Boustead, P.: Managing latency and fairness in networked games. Commun. ACM 49(11), 46–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salisbury, J.K., Srinivasan, M.A.: Phantom-based haptic interaction with virtual objects. IEEE Comput. Gr. Appl. 17(5), 6–10 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishibashi, Y., Hoshino, S., Fukushima, N., Sugawara, S.: QoE assessment of fairness in networked game with olfaction. In: Proceeding of the 11th ACM Annual Workshop on Network and Systems Support for Games (NetGames) (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ITU-R BT. 500–12: Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. International Telecommunication Union (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    ITU-T P. 800–1: Mean Opinion Score (MOS) terminology. International Telecommunication Union (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray, N., Qiao, Y., Lee, B., Muantean, G., Karunakar, A.K.: Age and gender influence on perceived olfactory & visual media synchronization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo (ICME) (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooks, P., Hestnes, B.: User measures of quality of experience: why being objective and quantitative is important. IEEE Netw. 24(2), 8–13 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A.S.: Regression analysis by example. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakamoto, T. (ed.): Human olfactory display and interfaces: Odor sensing and presentation. Information Science Reference (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ishibashi, Y., Tomaru, K., Tasaka, S., Inazumi, K.: Group synchronization in networked virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 885–890 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yutaka Ishibashi
    • 1
  • Sosuke Hoshino
    • 1
  • Qi Zeng
    • 1
  • Norishige Fukushima
    • 1
  • Shinji Sugawara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Scientific and Engineering Simulation, Graduate School of EngineeringNagoya Institute of TechnologyNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations