Advertisement

Multimedia Systems

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 385–393 | Cite as

The canonical processes of a dramatized approach to information presentation

  • Vincenzo Lombardo
  • Fabrizio Nunnari
  • Rossana Damiano
  • Antonio Pizzo
  • Cristina Gena
Regular Paper

Abstract

This paper describes the application “Carletto the spider” in terms of the mapping with the canonical processes of media production. “Carletto the spider” is a character-based guide to a historical site and implements the Dramatour approach for the design of drama-based interactive presentations. Dramatization makes presentations more engaging, thus improving the reception of the content by the user. The major technical issue of the approach is the segmentation of the presentation into audiovisual units that are edited on-the-fly in a way that guarantees dramatic continuity while adapting to the user response. We describe the workflow of the application and its mapping to the canonical processes of media production, envisaging possible standardizations for the application portability.

Keywords

Presentation Strategy Knowledge Source Text Area Canonical Process Interaction History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Damiano, R., Gena, C., Lombardo, V., Nunnari, F., Pizzo, A.: A stroll with carletto. adaptation in drama-based, interactive tours with virtual characters. User Model. Used Adapt. Interact. (accepted)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Nunnari, F., Pizzo, A.: Dramatization meets information presentation. In: Proceedings of ECAI 2006, pp. 31–35. Riva del Garda, Italy (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esslin M.: The Field of Drama. Methuen, London (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustav Freytag: Die Technik des Dramas. Hirzel, Leipzig (1883)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grosz B.J., Sidner C.L.: Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Comput. Linguist. 12, 175–204 (1986)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haeberlen, A., Flannery, E., Ladd, A.M., Rudys, A., Wallach, D.S., Kavraki, L.E.: Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks. In: MobiCom ’04: Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 70–84. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hardman, L., Nack, F., Obrenovic, Z., Kerherve, B., Piersol, K.: Canonical processes of semantically annotated media production (this issue)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Integrating plot, character and natural language processing in the interactive drama façade. In: 1st International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment TIDSE 03, pp. 139–151. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuggart (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKee R.: Story. Harper Collins, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murray J.: Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Picard R.: Affective Computing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Lombardo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fabrizio Nunnari
    • 2
  • Rossana Damiano
    • 1
  • Antonio Pizzo
    • 3
  • Cristina Gena
    • 1
  1. 1.CIRMAUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly
  2. 2.VRMMPTorinoItaly
  3. 3.CIRMAUniversità di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations