Advertisement

The boundary value problem for Yang–Mills–Higgs fields

  • Wanjun Ai
  • Chong Song
  • Miaomiao ZhuEmail author
Article
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

We show the existence of Yang–Mills–Higgs (YMH) fields over a Riemann surface with boundary where a free boundary condition is imposed on the section and a Neumann boundary condition on the connection. In technical terms, we study the convergence and blow-up behavior of a sequence of Sacks–Uhlenbeck type \(\alpha \)-YMH fields as \(\alpha \rightarrow 1\). For \(\alpha >1\), some regularity results for \(\alpha \)-YMH field are shown. This is achieved by showing a regularity theorem for more general coupled systems, which extends the classical results of Ladyzhenskaya–Ural’ceva and Morrey.

Keywords

Yang–Mills–Higgs Free boundary Neumann boundary Blow-up Regularity 

Mathematics Subject Classification

58E15 35J50 35R35 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez-Gaumé, L., Freedman, D.Z.: Geometrical structure and ultraviolet finiteness in the supersymmetric \(\sigma \)-model. Commun. Math. Phys. 80(3), 443–451 (1981)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bagger, J., Witten, E.: The gauge invariant supersymmetric nonlinear sigma model. Phys. Lett. B 118(1–3), 103–106 (1982)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banfield, D.: Stable pairs and principal bundles. Q. J. Math. 51(4), 417–436 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bethuel, F., Brezis, H.M., Hélein, F., Vortices, G.-L.: Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradlow, S.B.: Special metrics and stability for holomorphic bundles with global sections. J. Differ. Geom. 33(1), 169–213 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman, S.J., Howison, S.D., Ockendon, J.R.: Macroscopic models for superconductivity. SIAM Rev. 34(4), 529–560 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cieliebak, K., Gaio, A.R., Salamon, D.A.: \(J\)-holomorphic curves, moment maps, and invariants of Hamiltonian group actions. Int. Math. Res. Notices 16, 831–882 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Gennes, P.-G.: Superconductivity of Metals and Alloys, Advanced Book Classics, Advanced Book Program. Perseus Books, New York City (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donaldson, S.K.: Anti self-dual Yang–Mills connections over complex algebraic surfaces and stable vector bundles. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 50(1), 1–26 (1985)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du, Q., Gunzburger, M.D., Peterson, J.S.: Analysis and approximation of the Ginzburg–Landau model of superconductivity. SIAM Rev. 34(1), 54–81 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fraser, A.M.: On the free boundary variational problem for minimal disks. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 53(8), 931–971 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gulliver, R., Jost, J.: Harmonic maps which solve a free-boundary problem. J. Reine Angew. Math. 381, 61–89 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaffe, A., Taubes, C.: Vortices and Monopoles, Progress in Physics, Structure of Static Gauge Theories. Birkhäuser, Boston (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jost, J., Liu, L., Zhu, M.: The qualitative behavior at the free boundary for approximate harmonic maps from surfaces. Math. Ann. 374(1–2), 133–177 (2019)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Ural’ceva, N.N.: On the smoothness of weak solutions of quasilinear equations in several variables and of variational problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 14, 481–495 (1961)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ladyzhenskaya, O.A., Ural’ceva, N.N.: Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations, Translated from the Russian by Scripta Technica, Inc. Translation editor: Leon Ehrenpreis. Academic Press, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lieb, E.H., Loss, M.: Analysis, Second, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 14. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, A., Shen, L.: Gradient Flow of the Norm Squared of a Moment Map Over Kahler Manifolds. ArXiv e-prints (2018). arXiv:1802.09314 [math.DG]
  19. 19.
    Lin, F., Yang, Y.: Gauged harmonic maps, Born–Infeld electromagnetism, and magnetic vortices. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 56(11), 1631–1665 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu, K., Pan, X.-B.: Ginzburg–Landau equation with DeGennes boundary condition. J. Differ. Equ. 129(1), 136–165 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ma, L.: Harmonic map heat flow with free boundary. Comment. Math. Helv. 66(2), 279–301 (1991)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marini, A.: Dirichlet and Neumann boundary value problems for Yang–Mills connections. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 45(8), 1015–1050 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moore, J.D., Schlafly, R.: On equivariant isometric embeddings. Math. Z. 173(2), 119–133 (1980)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Morrey, C.B., Jr.: Multiple Integrals in the Calculus of Variations, Classics in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin (2008) (Reprint of the 1966 edition)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mundet i Riera, I.: A Hitchin–Kobayashi correspondence for Kähler fibrations. J. Reine Angew. Math. 528, 41–80 (2000)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mundet iRiera, I.: Hamiltonian Gromov–Witten invariants. Topology 42(3), 525–553 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nagy, Á.: Irreducible Ginzburg–Landau fields in dimension 2. J. Geom. Anal. 28(2), 1853–1868 (2018)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sacks, J., Uhlenbeck, K.: The existence of minimal immersions of \(2\)-spheres. Ann. Math. (2) 113(1), 1–24 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scheven, C.: Partial regularity for stationary harmonic maps at a free boundary. Math. Z. 253(1), 135–157 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sharp, B., Zhu, M.: Regularity at the free boundary for Dirac-harmonic maps from surfaces. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 55(2), 27 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Song, C.: Critical points of Yang–Mills–Higgs functional. Commun. Contemp. Math. 13(3), 463–486 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Song, C.: Convergence of Yang–Mills–Higgs fields. Math. Ann. 366(1–2), 167–217 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Song, C., Wang, C.: Heat flow of Yang–Mills–Higgs functionals in dimension two. J. Funct. Anal. 272(11), 4709–4751 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taubes, C.H.: The existence of a nonminimal solution to the \({\rm SU}(2)\) Yang–Mills–Higgs equations on \({ R}^{3}\). I. Commun. Math. Phys. 86(2), 257–298 (1982)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taubes, C.H.: The existence of a nonminimal solution to the \({\rm SU}(2)\) Yang–Mills–Higgs equations on \({ R}^{3}\). II. Commun. Math. Phys. 86(3), 299–320 (1982)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Uhlenbeck, K., Yau, S.-T.: On the existence of Hermitian–Yang–Mills connections in stable vector bundles. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 39(S, suppl), S257–S293 (1986). [Frontiers of the mathematical sciences: 1985 (New York, 1985)]MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Uhlenbeck, K.K.: Connections with \(L^{p}\) bounds on curvature. Commun. Math. Phys. 83(1), 31–42 (1982)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Urakawa, H.: Calculus of variations and harmonic maps. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 132. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1993) (Translated from the 1990 Japanese original by the author)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Venugopalan, S.: Yang–Mills heat flow on gauged holomorphic maps. J. Symplectic Geom. 14(3), 903–981 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wehrheim, K.: Uhlenbeck Compactness, EMS Series of Lectures in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich (2004)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Witten, E.: Phases of \(N=2\) theories in two dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B 403(1–2), 159–222 (1993)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xu, G.: The moduli space of twisted holomorphic maps with Lagrangian boundary condition: compactness. Adv. Math. 242, 1–49 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yu, Y.: The gradient flow for gauged harmonic map in dimension two II. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 50(3–4), 883–924 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhu, M.: Harmonic maps from degenerating Riemann surfaces. Math. Z. 264(1), 63–85 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and StatisticsSouthwest UniversityChongqingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Mathematical SciencesXiamen UniversityXiamenPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations