Advertisement

Global dynamics of the Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system with equal amount of total resources, III

  • Xiaoqing He
  • Wei-Ming Ni
Article

Abstract

In this paper—Part III of this series of three papers, we continue to investigate the joint effects of diffusion and spatial concentration on the global dynamics of the classical Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system. To further illustrate the general results obtained in Part I (He and Ni in Commun Pure Appl Math 69:981–1014, 2016. doi: 10.1002/cpa.21596), we have focused on the case when the two competing species have identical competition abilities and the same amount of total resources. In contrast to Part II (He and Ni in Calc Var Partial Differ Equ 2016. doi: 10.1007/s00526-016-0964-0), our results here show that in case both species have spatially heterogeneous distributions of resources, the outcome of the competition is independent of initial values but depends solely on the dispersal rates, which in turn depends on the distribution profiles of the resources—thereby extending the celebrated phenomenon “slower diffuser always prevails!” Furthermore, the species with a “sharper” spatial concentration in its distribution of resources seems to have the edge of competition advantage. Limiting behaviors of the globally asymptotically stable steady states are also obtained under various circumstances in terms of dispersal rates.

Mathematics Subject Classification

35B40 35B30 37C75 35J57 92D25 

References

  1. 1.
    Brown, K.J., Lin, S.S.: On the existence of positive eigenfunctions for an eigenvalue problem with indefinite weight function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 75, 112–120 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C.: On the effects of spatial heterogeneity on the persistence of interacting species. J. Math. Biol. 37, 103–145 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cantrell, R.S., Cosner, C.: Spatial Ecology via Reaction–Diffusion Equations, Series in Mathematical and Computational Biology. Wiley, Chichester (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dockery, J., Hutson, V., Mischaikow, K., Pernarowski, M.: The evolution of slow dispersal rates: a reaction–diffusion model. J. Math. Biol. 37, 61–83 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gilbarg, D., Trudinger, N.S.: Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Grundlehren der Mathematicschen Wissenschaften, vol. 224. Springer, Berlin (1983)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    He, X., Ni, W.-M.: The effects of diffusion and spatial variation in Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system, I: heterogeneity vs. homogeneity. J. Differ. Equ. 254, 528–546 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, X., Ni, W.-M.: The effects of diffusion and spatial variation in Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system, II: the general case. J. Differ. Equ. 254, 4088–4108 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    He, X., Ni, W.-M.: Global dynamics of the Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system: diffusion and spatial heterogeneity, I. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 69, 981–1014 (2016). doi: 10.1002/cpa.21596 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    He, X., Ni, W.-M.: Global dynamics of the Lotka–Volterra competition–diffusion system with equal amount of total resources, II. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. (2016). doi: 10.1007/s00526-016-0964-0
  10. 10.
    Holmes, E.E., Lewis, M.A., Banks, J.E., Veit, R.R.: Partial differential equations in ecology: spatial interactions and population dynamics. Ecology 75, 17–29 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hutson, V., López-Gómez, J., Mischaikow, K., Vickers, G.: Limit behavior for a competing species problem with diffusion. In: Dynamical Systems and Applications, World Scientific Series in Applicable Analysis, vol. 4, World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, pp. 343–358 (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hutson, V., Lou, Y., Mischaikow, K.: Spatial heterogeneity of resources versus Lotka–Volterra dynamics. J. Differ. Equ. 185, 97–136 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutson, V., Lou, Y., Mischaikow, K.: Convergence in competition models with small diffusion coefficients. J. Differ. Equ. 211, 135–161 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lam, K.-Y., Ni, W.-M.: Uniqueness and complete dynamics in the heterogeneous competition–diffusion systems. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 72, 1695–1712 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lou, Y.: On the effects of migration and spatial heterogeneity on single and multiple species. J. Differ. Equ. 223, 400–426 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lou, Y.: Some challenging mathematical problems in evolution of dispersal and population dynamics. In: Tutorials in Mathematical Biosciences IV, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1922, pp. 171–205, Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ni, W.-M.: The mathematics of diffusion. In: CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 82, SIAM, Philadelphia (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sattinger, D.H.: Monotone methods in nonlinear elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 21, 979–1000 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Senn, S., Hess, P.: On positive solutions of a linear elliptic eigenvalue problem with Neumann boundary conditions. Math. Ann. 258, 459–470 (1982)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shigesada, N., Kawasaki, K.: Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice, Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Partial Differential EquationsEast China Normal UniversityMinhangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of MathematicsUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations