Advertisement

Development of automated hybrid intelligent system for herbs plant classification and early herbs plant disease detection

  • M. S. Mustafa
  • Z. HusinEmail author
  • W. K. Tan
  • M. F. Mavi
  • R. S. M. Farook
Original Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Plants such as herbs are widely used in the medical and cosmetic industry. Recognizing a species and detecting an early disease of a plant are quite challenging and difficult to implement as an automated device. The manual identification process is a lengthy process and requires a prior understanding about the plant itself, such as shape, odour, and texture. Thus, this research aimed to realize the computerized method to recognize the species and detect early disease of the herbs by referring to these characteristics. This research has been developed a system for recognizing the species and detecting the early disease of the herbs using computer vision and electronic nose, which focus on odour, shape, colour and texture extraction of herb leaves, together with a hybrid intelligent system that are involved fuzzy inference system, naïve Bayes (NB), probabilistic neural network (PNN) and support vector machine (SVM) classifier. These techniques were used to perform a convenient and effective herb species recognition and early disease detection on ten different herb species samples. The species recognition accuracy rate among ten different species using computer vision and electronic nose is archived 97% and 96%, respectively, in SVM, 98% and 98%, respectively, in PNN and both 94% in NB. In the early disease detection, the detection rate among ten different herb’s species using computer vision and electronic nose are 98% and 97%, respectively, in SVM, both 98% in PNN, 95% and 94%, respectively, in NB. Integrated three machine learning approaches have successfully achieved almost 99% for recognition and detection rate.

Keywords

Herb species recognition Early herb disease detection Computer vision Electronic nose Hybrid intelligent system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Universiti Malaysia Perlis.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work. There is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in the manuscript entitled “Development of Automated Hybrid Intelligent System for Herbs Plant Classification and Early Herbs Plant Disease Detection.”

References

  1. 1.
    Husin Z, Shakaff AYM, Aziz AHA, Farook RSM, Jaafar MN, Hashim U, Harun A (2012) Embedded portable device for herb leaves recognition using image processing techniques and neural network algorithm. Comput Electron Agric 89:18–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wäldchen J, Rzanny M, Seeland M, Mäder P (2018) Automated plant species identification—trends and future directions. PLoS Comput Biol 14(4):e1005993.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005993 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Scotland RW, Wortley AH (2003) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 52(1):101–104.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3647306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AGB, Worm B (2011) How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 9(8):e1001127.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Govaerts R (2001) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50(4):1085–1090.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1224723 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Phytopathological S (1979) Index of common names of plant diseases. Index of plant diseases and common names, vol [41] leaves. American Phytopathological Society, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saleem G, Akhtar M, Ahmed N, Qureshi WS (2019) Automated analysis of visual leaf shape features for plant classification. Comput Electron Agric 157:270–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.12.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yigit E, Sabanci K, Toktas A, Kayabasi A (2019) A study on visual features of leaves in plant identification using artificial intelligence techniques. Comput Electron Agric 156:369–377.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sabrol H, Kumar S (2016) Fuzzy and neural network based tomato plant disease classification using natural outdoor images. Indian J Sci Technol 9(44):1–8.  https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i44/92825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barbedo JGA, Koenigkan LV, Santos TT (2016) Identifying multiple plant diseases using digital image processing. Biosys Eng 147:104–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Che Soh A, Radzi NFM, Yusof U, Ishak A, Hassan MK (2018) Development of electronic nose for classification of aromatic herbs using artificial intelligent techniques. J Eng Sci Technol 13(10):3043–3057Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohamad Yusof UK, Yusof U, Che Soh A, Radzi NFM, Ishak A, Hassan MK, Ahmad S, Khamis S (2015) Selection of feature analysis electronic nose signals based on the correlation between gas sensor and herbal phytochemical. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 9(5):360–367Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sun Y, Wang J, Cheng S, Wang Y (2019) Detection of pest species with different ratios in tea plant based on electronic nose. Ann Appl Biol 174(2):209–218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12485 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma R, Zhou M, Hunter MD, Fan X (2019) Rapid in situ analysis of plant emission for disease diagnosis using a portable gas chromatography device. J Agric Food Chem 67(26):7530–7537.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sankaran S, Mishra A, Ehsani R, Davis C (2010) A review of advanced techniques for detecting plant diseases. Comput Electron Agric 72(1):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Z, Sun X, Zhang Y, Ying Z, Ma Y (2016) Leaf recognition based on PCNN. Neural Comput Appl 27(4):899–908.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1904-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang M, Liang Y, Feng X, Fan X, Pei Z, Xue Y, Guan R (2018) Text classification based on deep belief network and softmax regression. Neural Comput Appl 29(1):61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2401-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madani A, Yusof R (2017) Traffic sign recognition based on color, shape, and pictogram classification using support vector machines. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2887-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sannaki S, Rajpurohit V, Nargund V, Kumar AR, Yallur P (2011) A hybrid intelligent system for automated pomegranate disease detection and grading. Int J Mach Intell 3(2):36–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Patel AK, Chatterjee S (2016) Computer vision-based limestone rock-type classification using probabilistic neural network. Geosci Front 7(1):53–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azar AT, El-Said SA (2013) Probabilistic neural network for breast cancer classification. Neural Comput Appl 23(6):1737–1751.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1134-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmed I, Guan D, Chung TC (2014) Sms classification based on naive Bayes classifier and apriori algorithm frequent itemset. Int J Mach Learn Comput 4(2):183–187.  https://doi.org/10.7763/IJMLC.2014.V4.409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bhagya Shree SR, Sheshadri HS (2018) Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using naive Bayesian classifier. Neural Comput Appl 29(1):123–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2416-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grosan C, Abraham A (2011) Hybrid intelligent systems. In: Kacprzyk J, Jain LC (eds) Intelligent systems: a modern approach. Springer, Berlin, pp 423–450.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21004-4_17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalyoncu C, Toygar Ö (2015) Geometric leaf classification. Comput Vis Image Underst 133:102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhao C, Chan SSF, Cham W-K, Chu LM (2015) Plant identification using leaf shapes—a pattern counting approach. Pattern Recognit 48(10):3203–3215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2015.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ali Jan Ghasab M, Khamis S, Mohammad F, Jahani Fariman H (2015) Feature decision-making ant colony optimization system for an automated recognition of plant species. Expert Syst Appl 42(5):2361–2370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aakif A, Khan MF (2015) Automatic classification of plants based on their leaves. Biosys Eng 139:66–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang B, Brown D, Gao Y, Salle JL (2015) MARCH: multiscale-arch-height description for mobile retrieval of leaf images. Inf Sci 302:132–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang X, Liang J, Guo F (2014) Feature extraction algorithm based on dual-scale decomposition and local binary descriptors for plant leaf recognition. Digit Signal Proc 34:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2014.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Husin Z, Shakaff AYM, Aziz AHA, Farook RSM (2013) Feasibility study on plant herbs species recognition using odour gas sensor (OGS) and multilayer perceptron (MLP) network algorithm. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on information technology and applications (ICITA 2013), SydneyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Che Soh A, Chow KK, Mohammad Yusuf U, Ishak AJ, Hassan MK, Khamis S (2014) Development of neural network-based electronic nose for herbs recognition. Int J Smart Sens Intell Syst 7(2):584–609.  https://doi.org/10.21307/ijssis-2017-671 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Omatu S, Yano M (2016) E-nose system by using neural networks. Neurocomputing 172:394–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.03.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Uçar A, Özalp R (2017) Efficient android electronic nose design for recognition and perception of fruit odors using Kernel Extreme Learning Machines. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 166:69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Niculescu-Mizil A, Caruana R (2005) Predicting good probabilities with supervised learning. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 22nd international conference on machine learning, Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Husin Z, Shakaff AYM, Aziz AHA, Farook RSM (2012) Feasibility Study on Plant Chili Disease Detection Using Image Processing Techniques. Paper presented at the 2012 Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems Modelling and Simulation, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMS.2012.33

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer and Communication EngineeringUniversiti Malaysia PerlisArauMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering TechnologyUniversiti Malaysia PerlisArauMalaysia

Personalised recommendations