Theoretical analysis and mathematical modeling of deformation and stresses of the grooving tool

  • Abdullah KurtEmail author
  • Serkan Bakir
Original Article


Machining operations involving complex multivariate parameters are defined by many machining parameters. Correct selection of these parameters is crucial for an efficient and economical cutting operation. The grooving operation required in many cases is one of the most problematic methods in all metal cutting operations, especially in terms of chip control. This paper covers theoretical analysis and mathematical modeling of deformation and stresses of the grooving tool. Cutting forces affecting the service life of the grooving tool were measured by various cutting experiments. Deformation and stresses of grooving tool caused by cutting forces were analyzed by finite element method using Ansys software. In modeling with artificial neural networks (ANN), grooving insert width, cutting speed, feed rate, radial force and primary cutting force are inputs in the model and deformation and stresses of the grooving tool are outputs. An algorithm, which is a Matlab script file, was developed to determine the optimal combination of neural network parameters such as the normalization method, number of hidden neurons, transfer function and training algorithm. The best-fitting set determined by the algorithm developed for the model was achieved with the Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation algorithm, logistic sigmoid transfer function, nine hidden neurons and normalization method with a scaling factor. The MSE, R2, MAPE values of the ANN model are 2.0327 × 10−6, 0.999992 and 0.379227, respectively. Performance results have shown that the proposed approach can also be used for ANN modeling of machining parameters in other cutting operations other than grooving.


Machining Grooving tool Cutting parameters Finite element method Artificial neural networks 



This study was supported by Gazi University, Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project Code: 07/2012-36). As authors, we are grateful to the Gazi University Scientific Research Projects Unit for providing financing support in the realization of this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Guemmour MB, Sahli A, Kebdani S et al (2015) Simulation of the chip formation and temperature distribution by the FEM. J Appl Sci 15:1138–1148. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Necpal M, Pokorný P, Kuruc M (2017) Finite element analysis of tool stresses, temperature and prediction of cutting forces in turning process. Solid State Phenom 261:354–361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yalçın B, Yılmaz N, Kurt A (2018) Tool stresses in soft and hard finish turning with low content CBN tool by finite elements analysis. Acta Phys Pol A 134:48–56. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Venkatesh SS, Ram Kumar TA, Blalakumhren AP et al (2019) Finite element simulation and experimental validation of the effect of tool wear on cutting forces in turning operation. Mech Mech Eng 23:297–302. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kurt A (2009) Modelling of the cutting tool stresses in machining of Inconel 718 using artificial neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 36:9645–9657. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gürbüz H, Sözen A, Şeker U (2016) Modelling of effects of various chip breaker forms on surface roughness in turning operations by utilizing artificial neural networks. J Polytech 19:71–83Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Esim E, Yıldırım Ş (2017) Drilling performance analysis of drill column machine using proposed neural networks. Neural Comput Appl 28:79–90. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karabulut Ş, Karakoç H (2017) Investigation of surface roughness in the milling of Al7075 and open-cell SiC foam composite and optimization of machining parameters. Neural Comput Appl 28:313–327. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ulas HB, Ozkan MT, Malkoc Y (2018) Vibration prediction in drilling processes with HSS and carbide drill bit by means of artificial neural networks. Neural Comput Appl. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Laouissi A, Yallese MA, Belbah A et al (2019) Investigation, modeling, and optimization of cutting parameters in turning of gray cast iron using coated and uncoated silicon nitride ceramic tools. Based on ANN, RSM, and GA optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 101:523–548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sureshkumar B, Vijayan V, Dinesh S et al (2019) Neural network modeling for face milling operation. Int J Veh Struct Syst 11:214–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Taşgetiren S (2000) An estimation of edge deterioration on cutting tool during turning: off-line stress analysis approximation. Afyon Kocatepe Univ J Sci 2:99–108Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahnama M, Movahhedy M (2012) Application of FEM simulation of chip formation to stability analysis in orthogonal cutting process. J Manuf Process 14:188–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Machai C, Iqbal A, Biermann D et al (2013) On the effects of cutting speed and cooling methodologies in grooving operation of various tempers of beta-titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 213:1027–1037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abhyankar AA, Abhyankar AA (2016) Effects of machining parameters in turning process for grooving operation on aluminium and optimizing by the application of Taguchi method and Minitab 14 software. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 4:344–350Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saffury J (2017) Chatter suppression of external grooving tools. Proc CIRP 58:216–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zlamal T, Malotova S, Szotkowski T et al (2019) The geometry of grooving tool and its influence on dynamic load system for turning. Transp Res Proc 40:602–609. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakır S (2014) Investigation of the stresses affect cutting tool on a grooving to the outer surface (in Turkish). MSc Thesis, Gazi University, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurt A, Bakır S (2014) The effect of grooving tool width on cutting forces in grooving operation (in Turkish). Gazi Univ J Sci Part C Des Technol 2:221–228Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carbide Mitsubishi (2013) General Catalogue. Grooving tools, Mitsubishi Carbide, pp F04–F037Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zorev NN (1963) Inter-relationship between shear processes occurring along tool face and shear plane in metal cutting. Paper presented at International Production Engineering Research Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 9–12 Sept 1963, pp 42–49Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ucun İ, Aslantaş K, Karabulut A (2009) Investigation of variation in tool-chip contact length in orthogonal cutting process. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 24:477–484Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheela KG, Deepa SN (2013) Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Math Prob Eng. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pitambare DP (2016) Survey on optimization of number of hidden layers in neural networks. Int J Adv Res Comput Commun Eng 5:537–540Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van den Berg RA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Westerhuis JA et al (2006) Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genom. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nawi NM, Atomi WH, Rehman MZ (2013) The effect of data pre-processing on optimized training of artificial neural networks. Proc Technol 11:32–39. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eesa A, Arabo W (2017) A normalization methods for backpropagation: a comparative study. Sci J Univ Zakho 5:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ertugrul ÖF (2018) Two novel versions of randomized feed forward artificial neural networks: stochastic and pruned stochastic. Neural Process Lett 48:481–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ertugrul ÖF (2018) A novel type of activation function in artificial neural networks: trained activation function. Neural Netw 99:148–157. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karlik B, Vehbi A (2011) Performance analysis of various activation functions in generalized MLP architectures of neural networks. Int J Artif Intell Expert Syst 1:111–122Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bircanoğlu C, Arıca N (2018) A comparison of activation functions in artificial neural networks. In: 26th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference, Izmir, pp 1–4.
  32. 32.
    Hu J, Xu L, Wang X et al (2018) Effects of BP algorithm-based activation functions on neural network convergence. J Comput 29:76–85Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maharajan C, Raja R, Cao J et al (2018) Global exponential stability of Markovian jumping stochastic impulsive uncertain BAM neural networks with leakage, mixed time delays, and α-inverse Hölder activation functions. Adv Differ Equ 1:113. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Altun Ş, Ertugrul ÖF (2018) Determining optimal artificial neural network training method in predicting the performance and emission parameters of a biodiesel-fueled diesel generator. Int J Autom Eng Technol 7:7–17Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Matlab Help (2018) Accessed 8 July 2019
  36. 36.
    Shehab T, Farooq M (2013) Neural network cost estimating model for utility rehabilitation projects. Eng Constr Archit Manag 20:118–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Faculty of TechnologyGazi UniversityTeknikokullar, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Graduate School of Natural and Applied SciencesGazi UniversityTeknikokullar, AnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations