Advertisement

Attributes reductions of bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems

  • Ghous Ali
  • Muhammad Akram
  • José Carlos R. AlcantudEmail author
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Attribute reduction methods constitute a very important preprocessing step for artificial intelligence and pattern recognition. It has been investigated in contexts ranging from rough sets to soft sets. In this study, firstly we propose the ideas of bipolar fuzzy relation systems and bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems. They constitute intuitive extensions of various systems, for instance decision tables, relation systems, relation decision systems, fuzzy relation systems (FRSs) and fuzzy relation decision systems (FRDSs). Secondly, relying on mathematical proofs we investigate the attribute reduction problems for bipolar fuzzy relation systems and bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems and we give their corresponding reduction algorithms. Moreover, we compute the reduction algorithms for FRSs and FRDSs as particular cases of bipolar fuzzy relation systems and bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems, respectively. The experimental results prove that the concepts in this study are valid and implementable.

Keywords

Bipolar fuzzy relation system Bipolar fuzzy relation decision system Fuzzy relation system Fuzzy relation decision system Attribute reduction 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest regarding the publication of the paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Akram M, Al-shehri NO, Davvaz B, Ashraf A (2016) Bipolar fuzzy digraphs in decision support systems. J Multi-Valued Log Soft Comput 27:531–551zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akram M, Sarwar M (2017) Novel applications of m-polar fuzzy competition graphs in decision support system. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2894-y zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akram M, Shahzadi S (2018) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy soft multiple-attribute decision-making methods. Neural Comput Appl 29(7):435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Akram M, Shahzadi S, Smarandache F (2018) Multi-attribute decision-making method based on neutrosophic soft rough information. Axioms 7(1):19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amin T, Chikalov I, Moshkov M, Zielosko B (2013) Dynamic programming approach to optimization of approximate decision rules. Inf Sci 221:403–418MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Amin T, Chikalov I, Moshkov M, Zielosko B (2014) Relationships between length and coverage of decision rules. Fundam Inform 129(1–2):1–13MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borowik G, Luba T (2014) Fast algorithm of attribute reduction based on the complementation of Boolean function. Advanced methods and application in computational intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–41Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen D, Tsang ECC, Yeung DS, Wang X (2005) The parameterization reduction of soft sets and its applications. Comput Math Appl 49(5):757–763MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen H, Li T, Cai Y, Luo C, Fujita H (2016) Parallel attribute reduction in dominance-based neighborhood rough set. Inf Sci 373:351–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du WS, Hu BQ (2016) Attribute reduction in ordered decision tables via evidence theory. Inf Sci 364:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feng Y, Hua Z, Liu G. A unified reduction model for fuzzy relation systems, MimeoGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (1991) Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117(1):63–83zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensen R, Shen Q (2007) Fuzzy-rough sets assisted attribute selection. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(1):73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jia X, Shang L, Zhou B, Yao Y (2016) Generalized attribute reduct in rough set theory. Knowl Based Syst 91:204–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jing Y, Li T, Luo C, Horng SJ, Wang G, Yu Z (2016) An incremental approach for attribute reduction based on knowledge granularity. Knowl Based Syst 104:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Saeid AB (2017) A new extension to PROMETHEE under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for solving supplier selection problem with linguistic preferences. Appl Soft Comput 60:564–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Murthy KK, Saeid AB (2018) A scientific decision-making framework for supplier outsourcing using hesitant fuzzy information. Soft Comput 22(22):7445–7461zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li H, Li D, Zhai Y, Wang S, Zhang J (2016) A novel attribute reduction approach for multi-label data based on rough set theory. Inf Sci 367:827–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu G, Hua Z (2018) Partial attribute reduction approaches to relation systems and their applications. Knowl Based Syst 139:101–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu G, Hua Z, Chen Z (2017) A general reduction algorithm for relation decision systems and its applications. Knowl Based Syst 119:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu G, Li L, Yang J, Feng Y, Zhu K (2015) Attribute reduction approaches for general relation decision systems. Pattern Recogn Lett 65:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mi JS, Wu WZ, Zhang WX (2004) Approaches to knowledge reduction based on variable precision rough set model. Inf Sci 159(3):255–272MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nguyen HS, Nguyen SH (1999) Rough sets and association rule generation. Fundam Inform 40(4):383–405MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pawlak Z (1996) Rough sets, rough relations and rough functions. Fundam Inform 27(2):103–108MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets: theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ren R, Wei L (2016) The attribute reductions of three way concept lattices. Knowl Based Syst 99:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rezaei A, Saeid AB (2012) Fuzzy congruence relations in CI-algebras. Neural Comput Appl 21(1):319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sakai H, Okuma H, Nakata M, Slezak D (2011) Stable rule extraction and decision making in rough non-deterministic information analysis. Int J Hybrid Intell Syst 8(1):41–57zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Skowron A, Rauszer C (1992) The discernibility matrices and functions in information systems. Intelligent decision support. Springer, Berlin, pp 331–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Slezak D (2009) Degrees of conditional (in)dependence: a framework for approximate Bayesian networks and examples related to the rough set based feature selection. Inf Sci 179(3):197–209MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsang ECC, Chen D, Yeung DS, Wang XZ, Lee JW (2008) Attributes reduction using fuzzy rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16(5):1130–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang C, Wu C, Chen D (2008) A systematic study on attribute reduction with rough sets based on general binary relations. Inf Sci 118(9):2237–2261MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang C, He Q, Chen D, Hu Q (2014) A novel method for attribute reduction of covering decision systems. Inf Sci 254:181–196MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhan J, Alcantud JCR (2018) A survey of parameter reduction of soft sets and corresponding algorithms. Artif Intell Rev 52:1839–1872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang W-R (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of FUZZ-IEEE, pp 835–840Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang W-R (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations. A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference, pp 305–309Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ziarko W (1993) Variable precision rough set model. J Comput Syst Sci 46(1):39–59MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of the PunjabLahorePakistan
  2. 2.BORDA Research Unit and IMEUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations