Advertisement

Virtual reality in the context of Internet of Things

  • Zhihan LvEmail author
Original Article
  • 59 Downloads

Abstract

In order to improve the user experience and efficiency of human–computer interaction in virtual reality technology, a comprehensive technology combined with high-tech achievements of multi-field is studied under the background of Internet of Things to realize the interaction between human and computer in a natural and intelligent way. The research results show that the interactive, simulated natural-state and three-dimensional environment can be formed at the display terminal through the processing and operation of information by computer program, which can make people feel immersed. It can be seen that in the environment of Internet of Things, the research on virtual reality technology should not only lay out top-level design and improve security and transmission efficiency, but also promote industrial application and enhance user stickiness. It would help to reveal the development trend of technology and the industrial layout and help relevant subjects to improve their level of technology R&D (research and development) and formulate competitive offensive and defensive strategies.

Keywords

Virtual reality Internet of Things Human–Computer interaction Modbus communication protocol Spatial database 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2017QF015) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61902203).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Premsankar G, Di Francesco M, Taleb T (2018) Edge computing for the Internet of Things: a case study. IEEE IoT J 5(2):1275–1284Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noura M, Atiquzzaman M, Gaedke M (2019) Interoperability in internet of things: taxonomies and open challenges. Mob Netw Appl 24(3):796–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang S, Shelden DR, Eastman CM, Pishdad-Bozorgi P, Gao X (2019) A review of building information modeling (BIM) and the internet of things (IoT) devices integration: present status and future trends. Autom Constr 101:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraga-Lamas P, Fernández-Caramés TM, Blanco-Novoa Ó, Vilar-Montesinos MA (2018) A review on industrial augmented reality systems for the industry 4.0 shipyard. IEEE Access 6:13358–13375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calyam P, Ricart G (2018) Research and infrastructure challenges for applications and services in the year 2021. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 46(3):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calyam P, Ricart G (2018) Research and infrastructure challenges for applications and services in the year 2021. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 46(3):11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodrigues JJ, Segundo DBDR, Junqueira HA, Sabino MH, Prince RM, Al-Muhtadi J, De Albuquerque VHC (2018) Enabling technologies for the internet of health things. IEEE Access 6:13129–13141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lytras M, Visvizi A, Daniela L, Sarirete A, Ordonez De Pablos P (2018) Social networks research for sustainable smart education. Sustainability 10(9):2974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang B, Yang J, Jiang N, Lv Z, Meng Q (2018) Quality assessment for virtual reality technology based on real scene. Neural Comput Appl 29(5):1199–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Park T, Zhang M, Lee Y (2018) When mixed reality meets internet of things: toward the realization of ubiquitous mixed reality. GetMobile Mob Comput Commun 21(1):10–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coogan CG, He B (2018) Brain–computer interface control in a virtual reality environment and applications for the internet of things. IEEE Access 6:10840–10849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang F, Hu M, Che W, Lin H, Fang C (2018) Framework for virtual cognitive experiment in virtual geographic environments. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7(1):36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cecil J, Gupta A, Pirela-Cruz M, Ramanathan P (2018) An IoMT based cyber training framework for orthopedic surgery using next generation internet technologies. Inform Med Unlocked 12:128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cheng J, Chen W, Tao F, Lin CL (2018) Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing. J Ind Inf Integr 10:10–19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ai Y, Peng M, Zhang K (2018) Edge computing technologies for Internet of Things: a primer. Digit Commun Netw 4(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mendes CR, Osaki RY, Da Costa C (2018) Application of Big Data and the Internet of Things in industry 4.0. Eur J Eng Res Sci 3(11):20–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aazam M, Zeadally S, Harras KA (2018) Offloading in fog computing for IoT: review, enabling technologies, and research opportunities. Future Gener Comput Syst 87:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Camacho F, Cárdenas C, Muñoz D (2018) Emerging technologies and research challenges for intelligent transportation systems: 5G, HetNets, and SDN. Int J Interact Des Manuf (IJIDeM) 12(1):327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chin J, Callaghan V, Allouch SB (2019) The Internet-of-Things: reflections on the past, present and future from a user-centered and smart environment perspective. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 11(1):45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tham JCK (2018) Interactivity in an age of immersive media: seven dimensions for wearable technology, internet of things, and technical communication. Tech Commun 65(1):46–65Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang J, Qu X, Sangaiah AK (2018) A study of green development mode and total factor productivity of the food industry based on the industrial Internet of Things. IEEE Commun Mag 56(5):72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shi R, Gan Y, Wang Y (2018) Evaluating scalability bottlenecks by workload extrapolation. In: 2018 IEEE 26th international symposium on modeling, analysis, and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems (MASCOTS), 25 September, IEEE, pp 333–347Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shi R, Wang Y (2016) Cheap and available state machine replication. In: 2016 {USENIX} annual technical conference ({USENIX}{ATC} 16) 2016, pp 265–279Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Qingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
  2. 2.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations