Advertisement

Crosstalk modeling in high-speed transmission lines by multilayer perceptron neural networks

  • Kai Siang Ooi
  • Chun Lei Kong
  • Chan Hong Goay
  • Nur Syazreen Ahmad
  • Patrick GohEmail author
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Signal degradation due to crosstalk-related issues has become increasingly important particularly in high-speed signal transmissions. Conventional analysis of crosstalk requires a full electromagnetic modeling of the signal transmission path along with a time-domain transient simulation which is computationally demanding. In this work, we apply a multilayer perceptron neural network for crosstalk prediction in coupled transmission lines. The well-trained neural networks can be used to predict the time-domain crosstalk directly, thereby replacing complex circuit simulations. Numerical results show a high degree of generalization of the neural networks, which are able to produce accurate results and can be trained to include effects such as reflections and input mismatches.

Keywords

Crosstalk Microstrip Multilayer perceptron Stripline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Universiti Sains Malaysia under the Research University (RUI) Grant (1001/PELECT/8014011).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Fan J, Ye X, Kim J, Archambeault B, Orlandi A (2010) Signal integrity design for high-speed digital circuits: progress and directions. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 52(2):392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deo M, Enabling next-generation platforms using Intel’s 3D system-in-package technology [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.intel.com
  3. 3.
    Hill DA, Cavcey KH, Johnk RT (1994) Crosstalk between microstrip transmission lines. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 36(4):314–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rizvi M, LoVetri J (1996) Modeling and reduction of crosstalk on coupled microstrip line structures and multichip modules: an FDTD approach. Int J Microw Millim-Wave Comput Eng 6(1):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Xiao FC, Liu WK, Kami Y (2001) Analysis of crosstalk between finite-length microstrip lines: FDTD approach and circuit-concept modeling. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 43(4):573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sohn YS, Lee JC, Park HJ, Cho SI (2001) Empirical equations on electrical parameters of coupled microstrip lines for crosstalk estimation in printed circuit board. IEEE Trans Adv Packag 24(2):521–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lu T, Sun J, Wu K, Yang Z (2018) High-speed channel modeling with machine learning methods for signal integrity analysis. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 60(6):1957–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das D, Lee CSG (2018) Cross-scene trajectory level intention inference using Gaussian process regression and naive registration. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technical Reports. Paper 491. Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dai F, Bao G, Su DL (2010) Crosstalk prediction in non-uniform cable bundles based on neural network. In: Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on antennas, propagation and EM theory. IEEE, Guangzhou, pp 1043–1046Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cannas B, Fanni A, Maradei F (2002) A neural network approach to predict the crosstalk in non-uniform multiconductor transmission lines. In: 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, Phoenix, pp 573–576Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ilumoka AA (2001) Efficient and accurate crosstalk prediction via neural net-based topological decomposition of 3-D interconnect. IEEE Trans Adv Packag 24(3):268–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mbairi FD, Siebert WP, Hesselbom H (2008) High-frequency transmission lines crosstalk reduction using spacing rules. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Technol 31(3):601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu S, Fan J (2013) Modeling of crosstalk between two nonparallel striplines on adjacent layers. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 55(6):1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang QJ, Gupta KC, Devabhaktuni VK (2003) Artificial neural networks for RF and microwave design-from theory to practice. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 51(4):1339–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rayas-Sanchez JE (2004) EM-based optimization of microwave circuits using artificial neural networks: the state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 52(1):420–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ozkaya U, Seyfi L (2018) A comparative study on parameters of leaf-shaped patch antenna using hybrid artificial intelligence network models. Neural Comput Appl 29(8):35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ye F, Zhang Z, Chakrabarty K, Gu X (2013) Board-level functional fault diagnosis using artificial neural networks, support-vector machines, and weighted-majority voting. IEEE Trans Comput Des Integr Circuits Syst 32(5):723–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheikhan M, Sha’bani AA (2013) PSO-optimized modular neural network trained by OWO-HWO algorithm for fault location in analog circuits. Neural Comput Appl 23(2):519–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beyene WT (2007) Application of artificial neural networks to statistical analysis and nonlinear modeling of high-speed interconnect systems. IEEE Trans Comput Des Integr Circuits Syst 26(1):166–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsu KT, Guo WD, Shiue GH, Lin CM, Huang TW, Wu RB (2008) Design of reflectionless vias using neural network-based approach. IEEE Trans Adv Packag 31(1):211–218Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kim H, Sui C, Cai K, Sen B, Fan J (2017) Fast and precise high-speed channel modeling and optimization technique based on machine learning. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 60(6):2049–2052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raja MA, Mehmood A, Niazi SA, Shah SM (2018) Computational intelligence methodology for the analysis of RC circuit modelled with nonlinear differential order system. Neural Comput Appl 30(6):1905–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5):359–366CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hornik K (1991) Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks. Neural Netw 4(2):251–257MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH, Jesús OD (2014) Neural network design. Martin HaganGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Setiono R, Hui L (1995) Use of a quasi-Newton method in a feedforward neural network construction algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 6(1):273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6):989–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nguyen T, Schutt-Aine JE (2018) A pseudo-supervised machine learning approach to broadband LTI macro-modeling. In: 2018 IEEE international symposium on electromagnetic compatibility and 2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific symposium on electromagnetic compatibility. IEEE, Singapore, pp 1018–1021Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nguyen T, Lu T, Sun J, Le Q, We K, Schut-Aine J (2018) Transient simulation for high-speed channels with recurrent neural network. In: IEEE 27th conference on electrical performance of electronic packaging and systems. IEEE, San Jose, pp 303–305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Siang Ooi
    • 1
  • Chun Lei Kong
    • 2
  • Chan Hong Goay
    • 2
  • Nur Syazreen Ahmad
    • 2
  • Patrick Goh
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Keysight TechnologiesBayan LepasMalaysia
  2. 2.School of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations