Advertisement

A survey of symbiotic organisms search algorithms and applications

  • Mohammed AbdullahiEmail author
  • Md Asri Ngadi
  • Salihu Idi Dishing
  • Shafi’i Muhammad Abdulhamid
  • Mohammed Joda Usman
Review Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Nature-inspired algorithms take inspiration from living things and imitate their behaviours to accomplish robust systems in engineering and computer science discipline. Symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm is a recent metaheuristic algorithm inspired by symbiotic interaction between organisms in an ecosystem. Organisms develop symbiotic relationships such as mutualism, commensalism, and parasitism for their survival in ecosystem. SOS was introduced to solve continuous benchmark and engineering problems. The SOS has been shown to be robust and has faster convergence speed when compared with genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization, differential evolution, and artificial bee colony which are the traditional metaheuristic algorithms. The interests of researchers in using SOS for handling optimization problems are increasing day by day, due to its successful application in solving optimization problems in science and engineering fields. Therefore, this paper presents a comprehensive survey of SOS advances and its applications, and this will be of benefit to the researchers engaged in the study of SOS algorithm.

Keywords

Symbiotic organisms search Metaheuristics algorithms Optimization Bio-inspired algorithms Local search Global search 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Manjarres D, Landa-Torres I, Gil-Lopez S, Del Ser J, Bilbao MN, Salcedo-Sanz S, Geem ZW (2013) A survey on applications of the harmony search algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(8):1818–1831Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ma H, Simon D, Fei M, Shu X, Chen Z (2014) Hybrid biogeography-based evolutionary algorithms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 30:213–224Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li B, Li Y, Gong L (2014) Protein secondary structure optimization using an improved artificial bee colony algorithm based on ab off-lattice model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 27:70–79Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sedghizadeh S, Beheshti S (2018) Particle swarm optimization based fuzzy gain scheduled subspace predictive control. Eng Appl Artif Intell 67:331–344zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarkhel R, Das N, Saha AK, Nasipuri M (2018) An improved harmony search algorithm embedded with a novel piecewise opposition based learning algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 67:317–330Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghasemi M, Taghizadeh M, Ghavidel S, Aghaei J, Abbasian A (2015) Solving optimal reactive power dispatch problem using a novel teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 39:100–108Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lim WH, Isa NAM (2015) Particle swarm optimization with dual-level task allocation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 38:88–110Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haixiang G, Yijing L, Yanan L, Xiao L, Jinling L (2016) Bpso-adaboost-knn ensemble learning algorithm for multi-class imbalanced data classification. Eng Appl Artif Intell 49:176–193Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moosavi SHS, Bardsiri VK (2017) Satin bowerbird optimizer: a new optimization algorithm to optimize anfis for software development effort estimation. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:1–15Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen Z-S, Zhu B, He Y-L, Le-An Y (2017) A pso based virtual sample generation method for small sample sets: applications to regression datasets. Eng Appl Artif Intell 59:236–243Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan TAMT (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Qin AK, Huang VL, Suganthan PN (2009) Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 13(2):398–417Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy J (2011) Particle swarm optimization. In: Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer, pp 760–766Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pham DT, Ghanbarzadeh A, Koc E, Otri S, Rahim S, Zaidi M (2011) The bees algorithm–a novel tool for complex optimisation. In: Intelligent production machines and systems-2nd I* PROMS virtual international conference (3–14 July 2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng M-Y, Lien L-C (2012) Hybrid artificial intelligence-based PBA for benchmark functions and facility layout design optimization. J Comput Civil Eng 26(5):612–624Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doerner K, Gutjahr WJ, Hartl RF, Strauss C, Stummer C (2004) Pareto ant colony optimization: a metaheuristic approach to multiobjective portfolio selection. Ann Oper Res 131(1):79–99MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dorigo M, Birattari M, Stutzle T (2006) Ant colony optimization. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 1(4):28–39Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (abc) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39(3):459–471MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cheng M-Y, Prayogo D (2014) Symbiotic organisms search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Struct 139:98–112Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yang X-S, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via lévy flights. In: World congress on nature and biologically inspired computing, 2009. NaBIC 2009. IEEE, pp 210–214Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yang X-S (2010) Firefly algorithm, stochastic test functions and design optimisation. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 2(2):78–84Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chu S-C, Tsai P-W, Pan J-S (2006) Cat swarm optimization. In: Pacific Rim international conference on artificial intelligence. Springer, pp 854–858Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang X, Li S (2017) Bas: beetle antennae search algorithm for optimization problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10724
  24. 24.
    Jiang X, Li S (2017) Beetle antennae search without parameter tuning (bas-wpt) for multi-objective optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02395
  25. 25.
    Khan AT, Senior SL, Stanimirovic PS, Zhang Y (2018) Model-free optimization using eagle perching optimizer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02754
  26. 26.
    Crepinsek M, Mernik M, Liu S-H (2011) Analysis of exploration and exploitation in evolutionary algorithms by ancestry trees. Int J Innov Comput Appl 3(1):11–19zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cheng M-Y, Prayogo D, Tran D-H (2015) Optimizing multiple-resources leveling in multiple projects using discrete symbiotic organisms search. J Comput Civ Eng 30(3):04015036Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolpert DH, Macready WG (1997) No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1(1):67–82Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Secui DC (2016) A modified symbiotic organisms search algorithm for large scale economic dispatch problem with valve-point effects. Energy 113:366–384Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nama S, Saha A, Ghosh S (2016) Improved symbiotic organisms search algorithm for solving unconstrained function optimization. Decis Sci Lett 5(3):361–380Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Banerjee S, Chattopadhyay S (2017) Power optimization of three dimensional turbo code using a novel modified symbiotic organism search (MSOS) algorithm. Wirel Pers Commun 92(3):941–968Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Banerjee S, Chattopadhyay S (2016) Optimization of three-dimensional turbo code using novel symbiotic organism search algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE annual India conference (INDICON). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Miao F, Zhou Y, Luo Q (2018) A modified symbiotic organisms search algorithm for unmanned combat aerial vehicle route planning problem. J Oper Res Soc 70:1–32Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vincent FY, Redi AP, Yang CL, Ruskartina E, Santosa B (2016) Symbiotic organism search and two solution representations for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Appl Soft Comput 52:657–672Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tejani GG, Savsani VJ, Patel VK (2016) Adaptive symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm for structural design optimization. J Comput Des Eng 3(3):226–249Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Spendley WGRFR, Hext GR, Himsworth FR (1962) Sequential application of simplex designs in optimisation and evolutionary operation. Technometrics 4(4):441–461MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jaszkiewicz A (2002) Genetic local search for multi-objective combinatorial optimization. Eur J Oper Res 137(1):50–71MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nama S, Saha AK, Ghosh S (2016) A hybrid symbiosis organisms search algorithm and its application to real world problems. Memet Comput 9:1–20Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saha S, Mukherjee V (2018) A novel chaos-integrated symbiotic organisms search algorithm for global optimization. Soft Comput 22(11):3797–3816Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Abdullahi M, Ngadi MA, Dishing SI (2017) Chaotic symbiotic organisms search for task scheduling optimization on cloud computing environment. In: 2017 6th ICT international student project conference (ICT-ISPC). IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Guha D, Roy P, Banerjee S (2017) Quasi-oppositional symbiotic organism search algorithm applied to load frequency control. Swarm Evol Comput 33:46–67Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Çelik E, Öztürk N (2018) A hybrid symbiotic organisms search and simulated annealing technique applied to efficient design of pid controller for automatic voltage regulator. Soft Comput 22(23):8011–8024Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sulaiman M, Ahmad A, Khan A, Muhammad S (2018) Hybridized symbiotic organism search algorithm for the optimal operation of directional overcurrent relays. Complexity 2018:1–11zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Abdullahi M, Ngadi MA (2016) Hybrid symbiotic organisms search optimization algorithm for scheduling of tasks on cloud computing environment. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0158229Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ezugwu AE-S, Adewumi AO, Frîncu ME (2017) Simulated annealing based symbiotic organisms search optimization algorithm for traveling salesman problem. Expert Syst Appl 77:189–210Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Çelik E, Öztürk N (2018b) First application of symbiotic organisms search algorithm to off-line optimization of PI parameters for DSP-based DC motor drives. Neural Comput Appl 30(5):1689–1699Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yalcın GD, Erginel N (2015) Fuzzy multi-objective programming algorithm for vehicle routing problems with backhauls. Expert Syst Appl 42(13):5632–5644Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Akbari M, Rashidi H (2016) A multi-objectives scheduling algorithm based on cuckoo optimization for task allocation problem at compile time in heterogeneous systems. Expert Syst Appl 60:234–248Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Reina DG, Ciobanu R-I, Toral SL, Dobre C (2016) A multi-objective optimization of data dissemination in delay tolerant networks. Expert Syst Appl 57:178–191Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Türk S, Özcan E, John R (2017) Multi-objective optimisation in inventory planning with supplier selection. Expert Syst Appl 78:51–63Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bandaru S, Ng AHC, Deb K (2017) Data mining methods for knowledge discovery in multi-objective optimization: part a-survey. Expert Syst Appl 70:139–159Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Rao RV, Rai DP, Balic J (2017) A multi-objective algorithm for optimization of modern machining processes. Eng Appl Artif Intell 61:103–125Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Savsani V, Tawhid MA (2017) Non-dominated sorting moth flame optimization (NS-MFO) for multi-objective problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell 63:20–32Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zou F, Wang L, Hei X, Chen D, Wang B (2013) Multi-objective optimization using teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(4):1291–1300Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tolmidis AT, Petrou L (2013) Multi-objective optimization for dynamic task allocation in a multi-robot system. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(5):1458–1468Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhang Z, Wang X, Lu J (2018) Multi-objective immune genetic algorithm solving nonlinear interval-valued programming. Eng Appl Artif Intell 67:235–245Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S, Sonmez Y, Kahraman HT (2018) Symbiotic organisms search optimization algorithm for economic/emission dispatch problem in power systems. Neural Comput Appl 29(3):721–737Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tran D-H, Cheng M-Y, Prayogo D (2016) A novel multiple objective symbiotic organisms search (MOSOS) for time-cost-labor utilization tradeoff problem. Knowl Based Syst 94:132–145Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Panda A, Pani S (2016) A symbiotic organisms search algorithm with adaptive penalty function to solve multi-objective constrained optimization problems. Appl Soft Comput 46:344–360Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ayala H, Klein C, Mariani V, Coelho L (2017) Multi-objective symbiotic search algorithm approaches for electromagnetic optimization. IEEE Trans Magn 53:1–4Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Abdullahi M, Ngadi MA, Dishing SI, Ahmad BI (2019) An efficient symbiotic organisms search algorithm with chaotic optimization strategy for multi-objective task scheduling problems in cloud computing environment. J Netw Comput Appl 133:60–74Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ali M, Siarry P, Pant M (2012) An efficient differential evolution based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems. Eur J Oper Res 217(2):404–416MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang Y-N, Wu L-H, Yuan X-F (2010) Multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution with elitist archive and crowding entropy-based diversity measure. Soft Comput 14(3):193–209Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Verma S, Saha S, Mukherjee V (2015) A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for congestion management in deregulated environment. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29:1–21Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Eki R, Vincent FY, Budi S, Redi AANP (2015) Symbiotic organism search (sos) for solving the capacitated vehicle routing problem. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng 9(5):850–854Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Abdullahi M, Ngadi MA et al (2016) Symbiotic organism search optimization based task scheduling in cloud computing environment. Future Gener Comput Syst 56:640–650Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhang B, Sun L, Yuan H, Lv J, Ma Z (2016) An improved regularized extreme learning machine based on symbiotic organisms search. In: 2016 IEEE 11th conference on industrial electronics and applications (ICIEA). IEEE, pp 1645–1648Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kanimozhi G, Rajathy R, Kumar H (2016) Minimizing energy of point charges on a sphere using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Int J Electr Eng Inform 8(1):29Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Guvenc U, Duman S, Dosoglu MK, Kahraman HT, Sonmez Y, Yılmaz C (2016) Application of symbiotic organisms search algorithm to solve various economic load dispatch problems. In: 2016 international symposium on innovations in intelligent systems and applications (INISTA). IEEE, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Prayogo D, Cheng M-Y, Prayogo H (2017) A novel implementation of nature-inspired optimization for civil engineering: a comparative study of symbiotic organisms search. Civ Eng Dimens 19(1):36–43Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dib N (2016) Synthesis of antenna arrays using symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE international symposium on antennas and propagation (APSURSI). IEEE, pp 581–582Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Dib NI (2016) Design of linear antenna arrays with low side lobes level using symbiotic organisms search. Prog Electromagn Res B 68:55–71Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nanda SJ, Jonwal N (2017) Robust nonlinear channel equalization using wnn trained by symbiotic organism search algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 57:197–209Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wu H, Zhou Y, Luo Q, Basset MA (2016) Training feedforward neural networks using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Comput Intell Neurosci 2016:1–14Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Rajathy R, Taraswinee B, Suganya S (2015) A novel method of using symbiotic organism search algorithm in solving security-constrained economic dispatch. In: 2015 international conference on circuit, power and computing technologies (ICCPCT). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tiwari A, Pandit M (2016) Bid based economic load dispatch using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. In: 2016 IEEE international conference on engineering and technology (ICETECH). IEEE, pp 1073–1078Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sonmez Y, Kahraman HT, Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S (2017) Symbiotic organisms search algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch with valve-point effects. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 29(3):495–515Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Duman S (2016) Symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow problem based on valve-point effect and prohibited zones. Neural Comput Appl 28:1–15Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Balachennaiah P, Suryakalavathi M (2015) Real power loss minimization using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. In: 2015 annual IEEE India conference (INDICON). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Prasad D, Mukherjee V (2016) A novel symbiotic organisms search algorithm for optimal power flow of power system with facts devices. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(1):79–89Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Saha D, Datta A, Das P (2016) Optimal coordination of directional overcurrent relays in power systems using symbiotic organism search (sos) optimization technique. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10:2681–2688Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zamani MKM, Musirin I, Suliman SI (2017) Symbiotic organisms search technique for SVC installation in voltage control. Indones J Electr Eng Comput Sci 6(2):318–329Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Baysal YA, Altas IM (2017) Power quality improvement via optimal capacitor placement in electrical distribution systems using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Mugla J Sci Technol 3:64–68Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Das S, Bhattacharya A (2016) Symbiotic organisms search algorithm for short-term hydrothermal scheduling. Ain Shams Eng J 9(4):499–516Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Guha D, Roy PK, Banerjee S (2018) Symbiotic organism search algorithm applied to load frequency control of multi-area power system. Energy Syst 9(2):439–468Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kahraman HT, Dosoglu MK, Guvenc U, Duman S, Sonmez Y (2016) Optimal scheduling of short-term hydrothermal generation using symbiotic organisms search algorithm. In: 2016 4th international Istanbul smart grid congress and fair (ICSG). IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Talatahari S (2016) Symbiotic organisms search for optimum design of frame and grillage systems. Asian J Civ Eng (BHRC) 17(3):299–313MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Nama S, Saha A (2018) An ensemble symbiosis organisms search algorithm and its application to real world problems. Decis Sci Lett 7(2):103–118Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Das B, Mukherjee V, Das D (2016) Dg placement in radial distribution network by symbiotic organism search algorithm for real power loss minimization. Appl Soft Comput 49:920–936Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Bozorg-Haddad O, Azarnivand A, Hosseini-Moghari SM, Loáiciga HA (2017) Optimal operation of reservoir systems with the symbiotic organisms search (SOS) algorithm. J Hydroinformatics 19:jh2017085Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Sadek U, Sarjaš A, Chowdhury A, Svečko R (2017) Improved adaptive fuzzy backstepping control of a magnetic levitation system based on symbiotic organism search. Appl Soft Comput 56:19–33Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Anwar N, Deng H (2017) Optimization of scientific workflow scheduling in cloud environment through a hybrid symbiotic organism search algorithm. Sci Int 29:499–502Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Kumar KP, Kousalya K, Vishnuppriya S (2017) Dsos with local search for task scheduling in cloud environment. In: 2017 4th international conference on advanced computing and communication systems (ICACCS). IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ezugwu AE, Adewumi AO (2017) Discrete symbiotic organisms search algorithm for travelling salesman problem. Expert Syst Appl 87:70–78Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Yang X-S (2011a) Review of meta-heuristics and generalised evolutionary walk algorithm. Int J Bio-Inspired Comput 3(2):77–84Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Fister I, Yang X-S, Brest J (2013) A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol Comput 13:34–46Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Chen Y-H, Huang H-C (2015) Coevolutionary genetic watermarking for owner identification. Neural Comput Appl 26(2):291–298Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Li X, Yao X (2012) Cooperatively coevolving particle swarms for large scale optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 16(2):210–224Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Kazemi SMR, Minaei Bidgoli B, Shamshirband S, Karimi SM, Ghorbani MA, Chau K, Kazem Pour R (2018) Novel genetic-based negative correlation learning for estimating soil temperature. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12(1):506–516Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Lee CKH (2018) A review of applications of genetic algorithms in operations management. Eng Appl Artif Intell 76:1–12Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Taormina R, Chau K-W, Sivakumar B (2015) Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. J Hydrol 529:1788–1797Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Moazenzadeh R, Mohammadi B, Shamshirband S, Chau K (2018) Coupling a firefly algorithm with support vector regression to predict evaporation in northern Iran. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12(1):584–597Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wu CL, Chau KW (2011) Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. J Hydrol 399(3–4):394–409Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Zhang S, Chau K-W (2009) Dimension reduction using semi-supervised locally linear embedding for plant leaf classification. In: International conference on intelligent computing. Springer, pp 948–955Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Hajikhodaverdikhan P, Nazari M, Mohsenizadeh M, Shamshirband S, Chau K (2018) Earthquake prediction with meteorological data by particle filter-based support vector regression. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12(1):679–688Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Hansen P, Mladenović N, Urošević D (2006) Variable neighborhood search and local branching. Comput Oper Res 33(10):3034–3045zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Geng J, Huang M-L, Li M-W, Hong W-C (2015) Hybridization of seasonal chaotic cloud simulated annealing algorithm in a SVR-based load forecasting model. Neurocomputing 151:1362–1373Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Črepinšek M, Liu S-H, Mernik M (2013) Exploration and exploitation in evolutionary algorithms: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 45(3):35zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Yang X-S (2011) In: International symposium on experimental algorithms. Springer, pp 21–32Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Zamuda A, Brest J (2012) Population reduction differential evolution with multiple mutation strategies in real world industry challenges. In: Swarm and evolutionary computation. Springer, pp 154–161Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAhmadu Bello UniversityZariaNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science, Faculty of ComputingUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Cyber Security ScienceFederal University of Technology MinnaMinnaNigeria
  4. 4.Department of MathematicsBauchi State University GadauBauchiNigeria

Personalised recommendations