Advertisement

Integrated intelligent computing for heat transfer and thermal radiation-based two-phase MHD nanofluid flow model

  • Muhammad Asif Zahoor RajaEmail author
  • Ammara Mehmood
  • Adeel Ahmad Khan
  • Aneela Zameer
Original Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, novel application of integrated computational heuristics is presented for computational fluid mechanics problem arising in the study of heat transfer and thermal radiation in two-phase magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) fluid flow model involving nanoparticles using the accurate approximation ability of neural networks hybrid with global exploration of genetic algorithm aided with local search exploitation of sequential quadratic programming. The networks are designed and arbitrarily combined to formulate mean squared error-based objective function for solving and governing nonlinear nanofluidic system. The designed methodology is evaluated to study the dynamics of the system by means of velocities, temperature and concentration profiles for prevailing factors based on variation in Reynolds and Schmidt numbers, as well as, rotation, radiation, magnetic, thermophoretic and Brownian parameters. The pragmatic worth of the scheme is established through statistical inferences in terms of accuracy, convergence and complexity metrics.

Keywords

Neural networks Genetic algorithms Sequential quadratic programming Fluid mechanics Nanofluids Magnetohydrodynamic 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Canuto C, Quarteroni A, Hussaini MY, Zang TA (2007) Fundamentals of fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–38zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bates PD, Lane SN, Ferguson RI (eds) (2005) Computational fluid dynamics: applications in environmental hydraulics. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Srikanth R, Balaji C (2017) Experimental investigation on the heat transfer performance of a PCM based pin fin heat sink with discrete heating. Int J Therm Sci 111:188–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheikholeslami M, Gerdroodbary MB, Ganji DD (2017) Numerical investigation of forced convective heat transfer of Fe-water nanofluid in the presence of external magnetic source. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 315:831–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hatami M, Sheikholeslami M, Hosseini M, Ganji DD (2014) Analytical investigation of MHD nanofluid flow in non-parallel walls. J Mol Liq 194:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheikholeslami M, Abelman S, Ganji DD (2014) Numerical simulation of MHD nanofluid flow and heat transfer considering viscous dissipation. Int J Heat Mass Transf 79:212–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheikholeslami M, Rashidi MM, Ganji DD (2015) Effect of non-uniform magnetic field on forced convection heat transfer of–water nanofluid. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 294:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ahmad L, Khan M, Khan WA (2017) Numerical investigation of magneto-nanoparticles for unsteady 3D generalized Newtonian liquid flow. Eur Phys J Plus 132(9):373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sahebi SAR, Pourziaei H, Feizi AR, Taheri MH, Rostamiyan Y, Ganji DD (2015) Numerical analysis of natural convection for non-Newtonian fluid conveying nanoparticles between two vertical parallel plates. Eur Phys J Plus 130(12):238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dinarvand S, Hosseini R, Pop I (2016) Homotopy analysis method for unsteady mixed convective stagnation-point flow of a nanofluid using Tiwari–Das nanofluid model. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 26(1):40–62MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Borker NS, Balaji C (2017) Numerical investigation of flow and heat transfer from impinging jets on a target surface with protrusions. Heat Transf Eng 39:568–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mall S, Chakraverty S (2015) Numerical solution of nonlinear singular initial value problems of Emden–Fowler type using Chebyshev neural network method. Neurocomputing 149:975–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raja MAZ, Ahmed I, Khan I, Syam MI, Wazwaz AM (2016) Neuro-heuristic computational intelligence for solving nonlinear pantograph systems. Front Inf Technol Electron Eng 10:1631Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yadav N, Yadav A, Kumar M, Kim JH (2017) An efficient algorithm based on artificial neural networks and particle swarm optimization for solution of nonlinear Troesch’s problem. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yadav N, Yadav A, Kim JH (2016) Numerical solution of unsteady advection dispersion equation arising in contaminant transport through porous media using neural networks. Comput Math Appl 72(4):1021–1030MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raja MAZ (2014) Numerical treatment for boundary value problems of pantograph functional differential equation using computational intelligence algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 24:806–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Masood Z, Majeed K, Samar R, Raja MAZ (2017) Design of Mexican Hat Wavelet neural networks for solving Bratu type nonlinear systems. Neurocomputing 221:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raja MAZ, Samar R, Alaidarous ES, Shivanian E (2016) Bio-inspired computing platform for reliable solution of Bratu-type equations arising in the modeling of electrically conducting solids. Appl Math Model 40(11):5964–5977MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sabir Z, Manzar MA, Raja MAZ, Sheraz M, Wazwaz AM (2018) Neuro-heuristics for nonlinear singular Thomas–Fermi systems. Appl Soft Comput 65:152–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raja MAZ, Zameer A, Khan AU, Wazwaz AM (2016) A new numerical approach to solve Thomas–Fermi model of an atom using bio-inspired heuristics integrated with sequential quadratic programming. SpringerPlus 5(1):1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jafarian A, Measoomy S, Abbasbandy S (2015) Artificial neural networks based modeling for solving Volterra integral equations system. Appl Soft Comput 27:391–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Raja MAZ (2014) Solution of the one-dimensional Bratu equation arising in the fuel ignition model using ANN optimised with PSO and SQP. Connect Sci 26(3):195–214MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baymani M, Effati S, Niazmand H, Kerayechian A (2015) Artificial neural network method for solving the Navier–Stokes equations. Neural Comput Appl 26(4):765–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Raja MAZ, Farooq U, Chaudhary NI, Wazwaz AM (2016) Stochastic numerical solver for nanofluidic problems containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Appl Soft Comput 38:561–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mehmood A, Zameer A, Ling SH, Raja MAZ (2018) Design of neuro-computing paradigms for nonlinear nanofluidic systems of MHD Jeffery-Hamel flow. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 91:57–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmad I et al (2016) Neural network methods to solve the Lane–Emden type equations arising in thermodynamic studies of the spherical gas cloud model. Neural Comput Appl 28:929–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Chaudhary NI, Shivanian E (2016) Reliable numerical treatment of nonlinear singular Flierl–Petviashivili equations for unbounded domain using ANN, GAs, and SQP. Appl Soft Comput 38:617–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Khan JA et al (2015) Nature-inspired computing approach for solving non-linear singular Emden–Fowler problem arising in electromagnetic theory. Connect Sci 27(4):377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raja MAZ, Khan JA, Haroon T (2015) Stochastic numerical treatment for thin film flow of third grade fluid using unsupervised neural networks. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 48:26–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majeed K et al (2017) A genetic algorithm optimized Morlet wavelet artificial neural network to study the dynamics of nonlinear Troesch’s system. Appl Soft Comput 56:420–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Tariq M, Ahmad I (2018) Design of artificial neural network models optimized with sequential quadratic programming to study the dynamics of nonlinear Troesch’s problem arising in plasma physics. Neural Comput Appl 29(6):83–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ahmad I et al (2018) Intelligent computing to solve fifth-order boundary value problem arising in induction motor models. Neural Comput Appl 29(7):449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raja MAZ, Niazi SA, Butt SA (2017) An intelligent computing technique to analyze the vibrational dynamics of rotating electrical machine. Neurocomputing 219:280–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raja MAZ, Mehmood A, Niazi SA, Shah SM (2018) Computational intelligence methodology for the analysis of RC circuit modelled with nonlinear differential order system. Neural Comput Appl 30(6):1905–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Raja MAZ, Shah AA, Mehmood A, Chaudhary NI, Aslam MS (2018) Bio-inspired computational heuristics for parameter estimation of nonlinear Hammerstein controlled autoregressive system. Neural Comput Appl 29(12):1455–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Akbar S et al (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic techniques hybridized with sequential quadratic programming for joint parameters estimation of electromagnetic plane waves. Wirel Pers Commun 96(1):1475–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zameer A et al (2017) Intelligent and robust prediction of short term wind power using genetic programming based ensemble of neural networks. Energy Convers Manag 134:361–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Alaidarous ES, Syam MI (2017) Design of bio-inspired heuristic technique integrated with interior-point algorithm to analyze the dynamics of heartbeat model. Appl Soft Comput 52:605–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Raja MAZ, Shah FH, Syam MI (2018) Intelligent computing approach to solve the nonlinear Van der Pol system for heartbeat model. Neural Comput Appl 30(12):3651–3675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lodhi S, Manzar MA, Raja MAZ (2017) Fractional neural network models for nonlinear Riccati systems. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-2991-y Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Raja MAZ, Manzar MA, Samar R (2015) An efficient computational intelligence approach for solving fractional order Riccati equations using ANN and SQP. Appl Math Model 39(10):3075–3093MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raja MAZ, Samar R, Manzar MA, Shah SM (2017) Design of unsupervised fractional neural network model optimized with interior point algorithm for solving Bagley–Torvik equation. Math Comput Simul 132:139–158MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sheikholeslami M, Ganji DD, Javed MY, Ellahi R (2015) Effect of thermal radiation on magnetohydrodynamics nanofluid flow and heat transfer by means of two phase model. J Magn Magn Mater 374:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sheikholeslami M, Abelman S (2015) Two-phase simulation of nanofluid flow and heat transfer in an annulus in the presence of an axial magnetic field. IEEE Trans Nanotechnol 14(3):561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Holland JH (1992) Genetic algorithms. Sci Am 267(1):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Goldberg DE, Holland JH (1988) Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 3(2):95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang S, Xiao J, Wang J, Jian G, Wen J, Zhang Z (2017) Configuration optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with helical baffles using multi-objective genetic algorithm based on fluid–structure interaction. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 85:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ghosh P, Mitchell M, Tanyi JA, Hung AY (2016) Incorporating priors for medical image segmentation using a genetic algorithm. Neurocomputing 195:181–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Veelken H, Schmitz G (2016) Optimization of a composite latent heat storage (CLHS) with non-uniform heat fluxes using a genetic algorithm. Int J Heat Mass Transf 101:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zhong S, Xie X, Lin L, Wang F (2017) Genetic algorithm optimized double-reservoir echo state network for multi-regime time series prediction. Neurocomputing 238:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nocedal J, Wright SJ (2006) Sequential quadratic programming. Springer, New York, pp 529–562Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Raja MAZ, Ahmed U, Zameer A, Kiani AK, Chaudhary NI (2017) Bio-inspired heuristics hybrid with sequential quadratic programming and interior-point methods for reliable treatment of economic load dispatch problem. Neural Comput Appl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3019-3 Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Qi H, Qiao YB, Ren YT, Shi JW, Zhang ZY, Ruan LM (2016) Application of the sequential quadratic programming algorithm for reconstructing the distribution of optical parameters based on the time-domain radiative transfer equation. Opt Express 24(21):24297–24312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang XZ, Ling BWK, Li CK, Leung NCM (2017) Optimal design of continuous time irrational filter with a set of fractional order gammatone components via norm relaxed sequential quadratic programming approach. Digit Signal Proc 64:28–40MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sun Z, Tian Y, Li H, Wang J (2016) A superlinear convergence feasible sequential quadratic programming algorithm for bipedal dynamic walking robot via discrete mechanics and optimal control. Optim Control Appl Methods 37(6):1139–1161MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyAttockPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Electrical EngineeringPakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied SciencesIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsAllama Iqbal Open UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  4. 4.Department of Computer and Information SciencesPakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS)Nilore, IslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations