Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Issue 12, pp 8195–8203 | Cite as

A machine learning approach for cost prediction analysis in environmental governance engineering

  • Di AiEmail author
  • Jisheng Yang
Machine Learning - Applications & Techniques in Cyber Intelligence

Abstract

The current model design for environmental governance cost prediction is too simple, it is difficult to obtain the ideal prediction accuracy, and it has the disadvantages of slow convergence. Based on this, this study combines the particle swarm optimization algorithm to improve the support vector machine and proposes a machine learning method based on particle swarm optimization support vector machine. Through the analysis of the machine learning process and the actual project of environmental governance, this study constructs a scientific predictive index system, proposes a predictive model based on particle swarm optimization parameters, and uses system clustering analysis to classify similar sample data. At the same time, this study compares the performance of BP neural network model-based prediction model, LSSVM model-based prediction model, and PSO-LSSVM model-based prediction model. The research indicates that the prediction model based on PSO optimization LSSVM has a good guiding significance for the cost prediction of environmental governance engineering, and is more suitable for the prediction of the pre-cost of environmental governance.

Keywords

Machine learning Environmental governance Cost Prediction model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71773032).

References

  1. 1.
    Robert C (2014) Machine learning, a probabilistic perspective. Chance 27(2):62–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen T, Du Z, Sun N et al (2014) DianNao: a small-footprint high-throughput accelerator for ubiquitous machine-learning. Acm Sigplan Notices 49(4):269–284Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nickel M, Murphy K, Tresp V et al (2015) A review of relational machine learning for knowledge graphs. Proc IEEE 104(1):11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buczak AL, Guven E (2017) A survey of data mining and machine learning methods for cyber security intrusion detection. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 18(2):1153–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pillonetto G, Dinuzzo F, Chen T et al (2014) Kernel methods in system identification, machine learning and function estimation: a survey ☆. Automatica 50(3):657–682MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Libbrecht MW, Noble WS (2016) Machine learning applications in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet 16(6):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanschoren J, Rijn JNV, Bischl B et al (2014) OpenML: networked science in machine learning. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 15(2):49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stratigopoulos HG, Makris Y (2015) Error moderation in low-cost machine-learning-based analog/RF testing. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 27(2):339–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sidorov G, Velasquez F, Stamatatos E et al (2014) Syntactic N-grams as machine learning features for natural language processing. Expert Syst Appl 41(3):853–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giusti A, Guzzi J, Dan CC et al (2017) A machine learning approach to visual perception of forest trails for mobile robots. IEEE Robotics Autom Lett 1(2):661–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasan S, Shamsuddin SM, Lopes N (2014) Machine learning big data framework and analytics for big data problems. Int J Adv Soft Comput Appl 6(2):1–14Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xing EP, Ho Q, Dai W et al (2015) Petuum: a new platform for distributed machine learning on big data. IEEE Trans Big Data 1(2):49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shan S (2014) Big data classification: problems and challenges in network intrusion prediction with machine learning. Acm Sigmetr Perform Eval Rev 41(4):70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ (2016) Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med 375(13):1216–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Landset S, Khoshgoftaar TM, Richter AN et al (2015) A survey of open source tools for machine learning with big data in the Hadoop ecosystem. J Big Data 2(1):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EconomicsHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations