Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 117–126 | Cite as

Study of the impact mechanism of inter-organizational learning on alliance performance—with relationship capital as the mediator

  • Lu ShanEmail author
  • Li Dan
  • Yu-mou Qiu
Brain- Inspired computing and Machine learning for Brain Health
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

In previous studies, most scholars merely focused on the direct effect of inter-organizational learning on alliance performance and the impact of relationship capital on the learning between alliance organizations, while ignoring the fact that inter-organizational learning may also exert a significant positive effect on relationship capital and further influence alliance performance through the intermediary of relationship capital. This article constructs a theoretical model of the indirect impact mechanism of the learning between alliance organizations on alliance performance with relationship capital as the mediator. Based on the questionnaire data of 210 alliance enterprises in China, this article empirically researches into the relationship among inter-organizational learning, relationship capital (trust and relationship commitment) and alliance performance. The findings suggest that in the specific management situations in China, the learning between alliance organizations can affect alliance performance not only in a direct manner, but also in an indirect manner through the intermediary of relationship capital. By summing up the empirical results, the article puts forward some suggestions on management practices to further enrich the understanding of the value of learning between alliance organizations.

Keywords

Inter-organizational learning Relationship capital Alliance performance Intermediary effect 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work in the paper is supported by National Social Science Fund item (15BGL180) and Hunan Provincial Social Science Fund item (17YBA258).

References

  1. 1.
    Tohidi H, Jabbari MM (2012) Measuring organizational learning capability. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 31:428–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lloria MB, Moreno-Luzon MD (2014) Organizational learning: proposal of an integrative scale and research instrument. J Bus Res 67(5):692–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saadat V, Saadat Z (2016) Organizational learning as a key role of organizational success. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 230:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shea J, Taylor T (2017) Using developmental evaluation as a system of organizational learning: an example from San Francisco. Eval Program Plann 65:84–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cegarra-Navarro JG, Sanchez-Vidal EM, Cegarra-Leiva D (2011) Balancing exploration and exploitation of knowledge through an unlearning context: an empirical investigation in SMEs. Manag Decis 49(7–8):1099–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sheng ML, Chien I (2016) Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms. J Bus Res 69(6):2302–2308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barão A, de Vasconcelos JB, Rocha Á, Pereira R (2017) A knowledge management approach to capture organizational learning networks. Int J Inf Manag 37(6):735–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andreou PC, Louca C, Petrou AP (2016) Organizational learning and corporate diversification performance. J Bus Res 69(9):3270–3284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paul DC, Robert BH, Benn L, Kenneth JP (2006) Creating supply chain relational capital: the impact of formal and informal socialization processes. J Oper Manag 24:851–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenart-Gansiniec R (2016) Relational capital and open innovatio—in search of interdependency. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 220:236–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang C-H (2014) How relational capital mediates the effect of corporate reputation on competitive advantage: evidence from Taiwan high-tech industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 82:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kabakus AT, Kara R (2017) A performance evaluation of in-memory databases. J King Saud Univ-Comput Inf Sci 29(4):520–525Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gyan AK, Brahmana R, Bakri AK (2017) Diversification strategy, efficiency, and firm performance: insight from emerging market. Res Int Bus Financ 42:1103–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiersma E (2017) How and when do firms translate slack into better performance? Br Account Rev 49(5):445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amir-Heidari P, Maknoon R, Taheri B, Bazyari M (2017) A new framework for HSE performance measurement and monitoring. Saf Sci 100:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golmoradi R, Ardabili FS (2016) The effects of social capital and leadership styles on organizational learning. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 230(12):372–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talukdar B (2017) Learning-by-doing, organizational capital and optimal markup variations. J Econ Asymmetries 15:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giniuniene J, Jurksiene L (2015) Dynamic capabilities, innovation and organizational learning: interrelations and impact on firm performance. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 213:985–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bahrami MA, Kiani MM, Montazeralfaraj R, Zadeh HF, Zadeh MM (2016) The mediating role of organizational learning in the relationship of organizational intelligence and organizational agility. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 7(3):190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tafvelin S, von Thiele Schwarz U, Hasson H (2017) In agreement? Leader-team perceptual distance in organizational learning affects work performance. J Bus Res 75:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zahra SA (2010) Harvesting family firms’ organizational social capital: a relational perspective. J Manag Stud 47:345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lopes-Costa JA, Munoz-Canavate A (2015) Relational capital and organizational performance in the portuguese hotel sector (NUTS II Lisbon). Procedia Econ Financ 26:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sulistyo H, Siyamtinah (2016) Innovation capability of SMEs through entrepreneurship, marketing capability, relational capital and empowerment. Asia Pac Manag Rev 21(4):196–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and TradeHunan University of CommerceChangshaChina
  2. 2.Mobile E-business Collaborative Innovation Center of Hunan ProvinceHunan University of CommerceChangshaChina
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsUniversity of Nebraska LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations