Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 1–9 | Cite as

Comparison of export and outward foreign direct investment models of Chinese enterprises based on quantitative algorithm

  • Danqi Li
  • Yinzhou Xu
  • Likui LinEmail author
S.I. : Brain- Inspired computing and Machine learning for Brain Health


Since the beginning of the new millennium, the productivity differences among different enterprises within the industry, namely the heterogeneity of enterprises, have been incorporated into the general equilibrium trade model. At the same time, it brings new focus to trade theory: By analyzing the characteristics of individual enterprises, it analyzes the choice of organizational structure of individual enterprises. Outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) and international trade are the two most important international economic activities nowadays. The development of OFDI will have certain impact on export trade. The relationship between OFDI and export trade is different due to the specific national conditions of different countries. Against this background, we study the impact of China’s expanding OFDI on export trade. We should make better use of OFDI to promote the development of China’s export trade and improve the export-oriented economic mode that relies solely on exports to expand the international market. It not only has theoretical value, but also has practical guiding significance for the formulation of China’s “going out” economic and trade policy. This study introduces heterogeneity into the international expansion behavior model of Chinese enterprises in the context of global value chain specialization. Taking the position of Chinese enterprises in the value chain as the location dimension, we have integrated and expanded a new concept of enterprise advantage based on the value chain status from the research category of international trade theory. In this paper, we introduce the behavior of competitors into the dimension of enterprise decision space and construct an endogenous dynamic equilibrium model of Chinese enterprises’ export trade and OFDI. The purpose is to provide theoretical explanations and practical guidance for Chinese enterprises’ export trade and endogenous optimization decision making in the process of deepening the division of labor in the global value chain.


Export trade Outward foreign direct investment Chinese enterprises 



We are grateful for the financial support of National Social Science Foundation Major Project(Grant No. 17ZDA047); Special Innovation Project of Guangdong Provincial Education Department (Grant No. 2015WTSCX007); Special Funds for Basic Scientific Research Services in Central Colleges and Universities (Grant No. 15JNQM008); Construction Funds of the High Level University of Jinan University.


  1. 1.
    Pradhan JP (2011) Emerging multinationals: a comparison of Chinese and Indian outward foreign direct investment. Inst Econ 3(1):113–148Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ko KW (2007) Internet externalities and location of foreign direct investment: a comparison between developed and developing countries. Inf Econ Policy 19(1):1–23MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henley JS (2010) Chasing the dragon: accounting for the under-performance of India by comparison with China in attracting foreign direct investment. J Int Dev 16(7):1039–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cai H (2014) China’s management policy of private enterprises’ foreign direct investment. In: International conference of information science and management engineering, pp 1467–1472Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kowalewski O, Radło MJ (2014) Determinants of foreign direct investment and entry modes of Polish multinational enterprises: a new perspective on internationalization. Communist Post-Communist Stud 47(3–4):365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bin XU, Jiangyong LU (2009) Foreign direct investment, processing trade, and the sophistication of China’s exports. China Econ Rev 20(3):425–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coughlin CC, Segev E (2010) Foreign direct investment in China: a spatial econometric study. World Econ 23(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beule FD, Bulcke DVD (2012) Locational determinants of outward foreign direct investment: an analysis of Chinese and Indian greenfield investments. Transnatl Corp 21(21):1–34Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu G (2012) The impact of Chinese enterprises’ foreign direct investment on chinese export trade. In: International conference on E-business and E-government. IEEE Computer Society, pp 1044–1047Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Branstetter LG, Feenstra RC (2002) Trade and foreign direct investment in China: a political economy approach. J Int Econ 58(2):335–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greaney Theresa M, Li Yao (2013) Trade, foreign direct investment and wage inequality in China: a heterogeneous firms approach. China Econ Policy Rev 2(02):178–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, Jacobs JPAM, Witteloostuijn AV (2007) Multinational enterprises, foreign direct investment and trade in China: the Chain of causality in 1980–2003. J Asia Bus Stud 2(1):48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pan D (2007) The impact of Foreign direct investment on China’s export trade. HLJ Foreign Econ Relat Trade 4:153–169Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics & TradeXinhua College of Sun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Research Institute of Distribution EconomicsGuangdong University of Finance and EconomicsGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Institute of Industrial EconomicsJinan UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations