Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Supplement 1, pp 147–159 | Cite as

The landing safety prediction model by integrating pattern recognition and Markov chain with flight data

  • Shenghan Zhou
  • Yuliang Zhou
  • Zhenzhong Xu
  • Wenbing ChangEmail author
  • Yang Cheng
S.I. : Machine Learning Applications for Self-Organized Wireless Networks
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to predict the landing state during the landing phase to ensure landing safety and reduce the accidents loss. Some past researches have demonstrated the landing phase is the most dangerous phase in flight cycle and fatal accident. The landing safety problem has become a hot research problem in safety field. This study concentrates more on the prediction and advanced warning for landing safety. Firstly, four landing states are divided by three flight parameter variables including touchdown, vertical acceleration and distance to go; subsequently, pattern recognition based on BP neural network is used to establish the landing state prediction model; the genetic algorithm is used to initialize the model parameter; the Markov chain is proposed to revise and improve the model for higher prediction precision. Finally, in comparison with pattern recognition and the Markov chain revision results, the Markov chain revision method is demonstrated to be practical and effective.

Keywords

Landing safety Flight data Pattern recognition Markov chain 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71271009 & 71501007 & 71672006). The study is also sponsored by the Aviation Science Foundation of China (2017ZG51081), the Technical Research Foundation (JSZL2016601A004) and the Graduate Student Education & Development Foundation of Beihang University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Witte L, Roll R, Biele J, Ulamec S, Jurado E (2016) Rosetta lander philae—landing performance and touchdown safety assessment. Acta Astronaut 125:149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yi L, Zhang S, Xueqing LI (2012) A hazard analysis-based approach to improve the landing safety of a BWB remotely piloted vehicle. Chin J Aeronaut 25(6):846–853 (in chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang L, Wu C, Sun R (2014) An analysis of flight quick access recorder (QAR) data and its applications in preventing landing incidents. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 127:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun YG, Sun L (2014) The design of avionics system interfaces emulation and verification platform based on QAR data. Appl Mech Mater 668–669:879–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang RC, Tan S (2012) Post flight analysis based on QAR in FOQA program for jet transport aircraft part I: angular position monitoring of flight control surface. J Aeronaut Astronaut Aviat 44(1):9–16Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mejias L, Eng P (2013) Controlled emergency landing of an unpowered unmanned aerial system. J Intell Robot Syst Theory Appl 70(1–4):421–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qiao Y, Hui Y, Dong T (2012) Research on QAR data mining method based on improved association rule. Phys Proc 24(Part B):1514–1519Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dai Y, Tian J, Rong H (2015) Hybrid safety analysis method based on SVM and RST: an application to carrier landing of aircraft. Saf Sci 80:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alfaro-Ponce M, Argüelles A, Chairez I (2016) Pattern recognition for electroencephalographic signals based on continuous neural networks. Neural Netw Off J Int Neural Netw Soc 79(C):88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonakdari H, Zaji AH (2016) Open channel junction velocity prediction by using a hybrid self-neuron adjustable artificial neural network. Flow Meas Instrum 49:46–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Afrand M, Nadooshan AA, Hassani M (2016) Predicting the viscosity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/water nanofluid by developing an optimal artificial neural network based on experimental data. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 77:49–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jing X, Wang Z, Tan C, Si L, Liu X (2015) A cutting pattern recognition method for shearers based on improved ensemble empirical mode decomposition and a probabilistic neural network. Sensors 15(11):27721–27737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang G, Shi P, Messenger P (2009) Representation of uncertain multichannel digital signal spaces and study of pattern recognition based on metrics and difference values on fuzzy n-cell number spaces. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17(2):421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu YM, Zhang S (2014) Dynamic process of quality abnormal pattern recognition based on PCA-SVM. Adv Mater Res 860–863:2686–2689Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bortolussi L, Milios D, Sanguinetti G (2016) Smoothed model checking for uncertain continuous-time Markov chains. Inf Comput 247:235–253MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ching J, Wang JS (2016) Application of the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to probabilistic site characterization. Eng Geol 203:151–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Champion C, Houghton SM (2016) Application of continuous state hidden Markov models to a classical problem in speech recognition. Comput Speech Lang 36:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng Y, Wang S, Feng J (2016) A modified quantized kernel least mean square algorithm for prediction of chaotic time series. Digit Signal Process 48(C):130–136MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alsina EF, Bortolini M, Gamberi M (2016) Artificial neural network optimisation for monthly average daily global solar radiation prediction. Energy Convers Manag 120:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiao Y, Zhang R, Zhao Q, Kaku I, Xu Y (2014) A variable neighborhood search with an effective local search for uncapacitated multilevel lot-sizing problems. Eur J Oper Res 235(1):102–114MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jia F, Lei Y, Lin J, Zhou X, Lu N (2016) Deep neural networks: a promising tool for fault characteristic mining and intelligent diagnosis of rotating machinery with massive data. Mech Syst Signal Process 72–73:303–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pawlak J, Hercman H (2016) Numerical correlation of speleothem stable isotope records using a genetic algorithm. Quat Geochronol 33:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang R, Kaku I, Xiao Y (2012) Model and heuristic algorithm of the joint replenishment problem with complete backordering and correlated demand. Int J Prod Econ 139(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhao Y, Fatehi A, Huang B (2017) A data-driven hybrid ARX and Markov chain modeling approach to process identification with time-varying time delays. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 64(5):4226–4236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Brice O, Fabien S, Delphine MB (2015) The precision–recall curve overcame the optimism of the receiver operating characteristic curve in rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol 68(8):855–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Reliability and System EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Industrial ProductionAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations