Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Supplement 1, pp 47–62 | Cite as

DECSA: hybrid dolphin echolocation and crow search optimization for cluster-based energy-aware routing in WSN

  • N. MaheshEmail author
  • S. Vijayachitra
S.I. : Machine Learning Applications for Self-Organized Wireless Networks
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Data clustering in wireless sensor network (WSN) is a prominent research area that ensures effective communication through satisfying the energy constraint. The traditional methods engaged themselves in collecting the data from the remote area using WSNs and communicating the data in such a way to enhance the lifetime of the network. However, the energy constraints are not met by the available methods in the literature. The paper concentrates on the hybrid optimization algorithm to tackle the cluster head selection optimally so as to assure the effective communication and energy-aware routing in WSNs. The hybrid optimization algorithm, named dolphin echolocation-based crow search algorithm, is the integration of dolphin echolocation algorithm and crow search algorithm such that the hybrid optimization assures the selection of cluster heads based on the multi-constraints effectively and with high convergence rate. The energy-aware routing is initiated in WSN using the proposed algorithm. Simulation is progressed in the WSN environment using 50, 75, and 100 nodes, and the proposed algorithm offered a better network lifetime with energy remaining in the node to be 0.0476 with 33 alive nodes at the end of 200 rounds.

Keywords

WSN Cluster head selection Energy-aware routing Hybrid optimization CSA 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest for authors to publish their article in the journal.

References

  1. 1.
    Negra R, Jemili I, Belghith A (2016) Wireless body area networks: applications and technologies. Procedia Comput Sci 83:1274–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Challal Y, Ouadjaout A, Lasla N, Bagaa M, Hadjidj A (2011) Secure and efficient disjoint multipath construction for fault tolerant routing in wireless sensor networks. J Netw Comput Appl 34(4):1380–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Omar M, Yahiaoui S, Bouabdallah A (2016) Reliable and energy aware query-driven routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Ann Telecommun 71(1–2):73–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hammoudeh M, Newman R (2015) Adaptive routing in wireless sensor networks: qoS optimisation for enhanced application performance. Inf Fusion 22:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee J-S, Cheng W-L (2012) Fuzzy-logic-based clustering approach for wireless sensor networks using energy predication. IEEE Sens J 12(9):2891–2897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar R, Kumar D (2016) Multi-objective fractional artificial bee colony algorithm to energy aware routing protocol in wireless sensor network. Wirel Netw 22(5):1461–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li F, Wang L (2018) Energy-aware routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks with optimal relay detecting. Wirel Pers Commun 98(2):1701–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amgoth T, Jana PK, Thampi S (2015) Energy-aware routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 41(C):357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on systems science, vol 1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fersi G, Louati W, Ben Jemaa M (2016) CLEVER: cluster-based energy-aware virtual ring routing in randomly deployed wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 9(4):640–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boulaiche M, Bouallouche-Medjkoune L (2015) EGGR: energy-aware and delivery guarantee geographic routing protocol. Wirel Netw 21(6):1765–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang XM, Zhang Y, Yan F, Vasilakos AV (2015) Interference-based topology control algorithm for delay-constrained mobile Ad hoc networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 14(4):742–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang M, Li Y, Jin D, Zeng L, Wu X, Vasilakos AV (2015) Software-defined and virtualized future mobile and wireless networks: a survey. Mobile Netw Appl 20(1):4–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haseeb K, Bakar KA, Abdullah AH, Darwish T (2017) Adaptive energy aware cluster-based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 23(6):1953–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kong L, Pan J-S, Snášel V, Tsai P-W, Sung T-W (2017) An energy-aware routing protocol for wireless sensor network based on genetic algorithm. Telecommun, SystGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah MA, Abbas G, Dogar AB, Halim Z (2015) Scaling hierarchical clustering and energy aware routing for sensor networks. Complex Adapt Syst Model 3(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khabiri M, Ghaffari A (2017) “Energy-aware clustering-based routing in wireless sensor networks using cuckoo optimization algorithm. Wirel Pers Commun 98:2473–2495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Purkait R, Tripathi S (2017) Energy aware fuzzy based multi-hop routing protocol using unequal clustering. Wirel Pers Commun 94(3):809–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiao Y, Peng M, Gibson J, Xie G, Du D, Vasilakos A (2011) Tight performance bounds of multi-hop fair-access for MAC protocols in wireless sensor networks and underwater sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 11(99):1–1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Meng T, Wu F, Yang Z, Chen G, Vasilakos AV (2016) Spatial reusability-aware routing in multi-hop wireless networks. IEEE Trans Comput 65(1):244–255MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vasilakos AV, Li Z, Simon G, You W (2015) Information centric network: research challenges and opportunities. J Netw Comput Appl 52:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhu N, Vasilakos AV (2016) A generic framework for energy evaluation on wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 22(4):1199–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allan R (2012) Energy harvesting powers industrial wireless sensor networks. Electon Des Eng Feature 60:22–29Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar R, Kumar D (2016) Multi-objective fractional artificial bee colony algorithm to energy aware routing protocol in wireless sensor network. Wirel Netw 22(5):1461–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumar A, Sachin Y (2016) QMRPRNS: design of QoS multicast routing protocol using reliable node selection scheme for MANETs. Peer-to-Peer Netw, ApplGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Askarzadeh A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Comput Struct 169:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borkar GM, Mahajan AR (2016) “A secure and trust based on-demand multipath routing scheme for self-organized mobile ad-hoc networks. Wirel Netw 23(8):2455–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kaveh A, Farhoudi N (2016) Dolphin echolocation optimization: continuous search space. Adv Comput Des 2(2):175–194Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringKongu Engineering CollegeErodeIndia

Personalised recommendations