Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Supplement 2, pp 845–855 | Cite as

Knowledge building through optimized classification rule set generation using genetic based elitist multi objective approach

  • Preeti GuptaEmail author
  • Tarun Kumar Sharma
  • Deepti Mehrotra
  • Ajith Abraham
Original Article

Abstract

Knowledge building is an important activity taken up by various organizations. The paper exemplifies the creation of a knowledge-centric environment for a non-profit sector such as a higher education. Building knowledge and thereafter using it are important aspects of knowledge-centric environment; this further helps the organization to gain competitive advantage. With the increase in popularity of genetic algorithm (GA), the technique has been used in building efficient classifiers for creating effective rule sets. The paper makes use of multi-objective genetic algorithm for building GA-based efficient classifier because classification rule mining is itself, a multi-objective problem. Knowledge expressed through classification rules help in establishing relationships between attributes that are not visible openly. The study assumes importance as curriculum planning is an important aspect of any academic institution, the knowledge derived in the form of rules residing in the knowledge base help to substantiate proper curriculum development, making a sizeable contribution toward professional growth and advancement of the students. On implementation of the findings, educational organizations will be able to institute themselves as knowledge centric.

Keywords

Knowledge Genetic algorithm Classification Multi-objective optimization Higher education 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors would like thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments to improvise the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Rostami NA (2014) Integration of business intelligence and knowledge management—a literature review. J Intell Stud Bus 4:30–40Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Surbakti H (2015) Integrating knowledge management and business intelligence processes for empowering government business organizations. Int J Comput Appl 114:36–45Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashrafi N, Kelleher L, Kuilboer JP (2014) The impact of business intelligence on healthcare delivery in the USA. Interdiscip J Inf Knowl Manag 9:117–130Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sowa JF (2000) Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundation. Brook/Cole, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rich E, Knight K, Nair SB (2010) Artificial intelligence. TMH, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goldberg DE (1989) Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Addison-Wesley Longman, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jong KAD, Spears WM, Gordon DF (1993) Using genetic algorithms for concept learning. Mach Learn. doi: 10.1007/BF00993042 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aickelin U (2002) An indirect genetic algorithm for set covering problems. J Oper Res Soc 53(10):1118–1126CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schaffer JD (1985) Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms. In: Grefenstette JJ (ed) Proceedings of first international conference on genetic algorithms, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han J, Kamber M (2000) Data mining: concepts and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, BurlingtonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nickols FW (2000) The knowledge in knowledge management. In: Cortada JW, Woods JA (eds) The knowledge management yearbook 2000–2001. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 12–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jong TD, Ferguson Hesler MGM (1996) Types and quality of knowledge. Educ Psychol 31:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gupta P, Mehrotra D, Singh R (2012) Achieving excellence through knowledge mapping in higher education institution. In: Proceedings of international conference on recent advances and future trends in information technology (iRAFIT 2012), Patiala, iRAFIT(8), pp 5–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rusli A, Selamat MH, Jaafar A, Abdullah S, Sura S (2008) An empirical study of knowledge management system implementation in public higher learning institution. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 8:281–290Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sahay A, Mehta K (2010) Assisting higher education in assessing, predicting, and managing issues related to student success: a web-based software using data mining and quality function deployment. In: Proceedings of Academic and Business Research Institute Conference, Las Vegas, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sagsan M (2009) Knowledge management discipline: test for an undergraduate program in Turkey. Electron J Knowl ManagGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright H (2008) Tacit knowledge and pedagogy at UK universities; challenges for effective management. Electron J Knowl Manag 6(1):49–62Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cranfield DJ, Taylor J (2008) Knowledge management and higher education: a UK case study. Electron J Knowl Manag 6(2):85–100Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dutta D, Dutta P (2010) Optimized classification rule set generation using pareto based binary coded elitist multi objective genetic algorithm. In: Conference proceeding of 4th international conference on intelligent systems and networks Haryana, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dutta D, Sil J (2013) Evolution of genetic algorithms in classification rule mining. In: Bhattacharyya S, Dutta P (ed) Handbook of research on computational intelligence for engineering, science, and business, vol 1. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 328–363Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhong-Yang X, Lei Z, Yu-Fang Z (2004) A classification rule mining method using hybrid genetic algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE region 10 conference (TENCON 2004) Chiang Mai, Thailand: IEEE, pp 207–210Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dehuri S, Patnaik S, Ghosh A et al (2008) Application of elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm for classification rule generation. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):477–487. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2007.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dutta D (2009) Classification rules generation for iris data using lexicographic pareto based multi objective genetic algorithm. In: Conference proceedings of 3rd international conference on intelligent systems and networks (IISN 2009), At Klawad, Haryana, India, pp 173–177Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaya M (2010) Autonomous classifiers with understandable rule using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):3489–3494. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dutta D, Dutta P (2011) A real coded MOGA for mining classification rules with missing attribute values. In: Proceedings of international conference on communication, computing and security, India, pp 355–358Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta P, Mehrotra D, Sharma TK (2015) Genetic based weighted aggregation model for optimization of student’s performance in higher education. In: Proceedings of fifth international conference on soft computing for problem solving volume 436 of the series, advances in intelligent systems and computing, pp 877–887Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta P, Mehrotra D, Sharma TK (2016) Role of decision tree in supplementing tacit knowledge for hypothetico-deduction in higher education. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag. doi: 10.1007/s13198-016-0483-6
  29. 29.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multi objective genetic algorithm: NSGA—II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) An evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the strength pareto approach computer engineering and networks laboratory (TIK). Zürich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zürich (ETH). doi: 10.3929/ethz-a-004288833 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Preeti Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tarun Kumar Sharma
    • 1
  • Deepti Mehrotra
    • 2
  • Ajith Abraham
    • 3
  1. 1.Amity University Rajasthan AURJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Amity University Uttar Pradesh AUUPNoidaIndia
  3. 3.Machine Intelligence Research LabsAuburnUSA

Personalised recommendations