Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Supplement 2, pp 793–800 | Cite as

A finite-time convergent Zhang neural network and its application to real-time matrix square root finding

  • Lin XiaoEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

In this paper, a finite-time convergent Zhang neural network (ZNN) is proposed and studied for matrix square root finding. Compared to the original ZNN (OZNN) model, the finite-time convergent ZNN (FTCZNN) model fully utilizes a nonlinearly activated sign-bi-power function, and thus possesses faster convergence ability. In addition, the upper bound of convergence time for the FTCZNN model is theoretically derived and estimated by solving differential inequalities. Simulative comparisons are further conducted between the OZNN model and the FTCZNN model under the same conditions. The results validate the effectiveness and superiority of the FTCZNN model for matrix square root finding.

Keywords

Zhang neural networks Matrix square root Finite-time convergence Nonlinear activation function Upper bound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (grant no. 2016JJ2101), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61503152), the Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China (grant no. 15B192), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 61563017, 61561022, 61363073, and 61363033), and the Research Foundation of Jishou University, China (grant nos. 2015SYJG034, JGY201643, and JG201615). In addition, the author thanks the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and constructive comments which have really helped the author improve the presentation and quality of this paper very much.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Charles RJ, Kazuyoshi O, Robert R (2001) Uniqueness of matrix square roots and an application. Linear Algebra Appl 323:51–60MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iannazzo B (2003) A note on computing the matrix square root. Calcolo 40:273–283MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meini B (2003) The matrix square root from a new functional perspective: theoretical results and computational issues Technical Report, vol 1455. Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, PisaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Long J, Hu X, Zhang L (2008) Newton’s method with exact line search for the square root of a matrix. J Phys Conf Ser 96:1–5Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Y, Chen D, Guo D, Liao B, Wang Y (2015) On exponential convergence of nonlinear gradient dynamics system with application to square root finding. Nolinear Dyn 79:983–1003MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohammed AH, Ali AH, Syed R (2000) Fixed point iterations for computing square roots and the matrix sign function of complex matrices Proceedings IEEE international conference on decision and control, pp 4253–4258Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang Y, Li W, Guo D, Ke Z (2013) Different Zhang functions leading to different ZNN models illustrated via time-varying matrix square roots finding. Expert Syst Appl 40:4393–4403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Y, Yang Y, Cai B, Guo D (2012) Zhang neural network and its application to Newton iteration for matrix square root estimation. Neur Comput Appl 21:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang Y, Ke Z, Xu P, Yi C (2010) Time-varying square roots finding via Zhang dynamics versus gradient dynamics and the former’s link and new explanation to Newton-Raphson iteration. Inform Process Lett 110:1103–1109MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peng J, Wang J, Wang W (2011) Neural network based robust hybrid control for robotic system: an H- approach. Nolinear Dyn 65:421–431MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fei J, Ding F (2012) Adaptive sliding mode control of dynamic system using RBF neural network. Nolinear Dyn 70:1563–1573MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang Y, Li Z, Guo D, Li W, Chen P (2013) Z-type and G-type models for time-varying inverse square root (TVISR) solving. Soft Comput 17:2021–2032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang Y, Ruan G, Li K, Yang Y (2010) Robustness analysis of the Zhang neural network for online time-varying quadratic optimization. J Phys A Math Theor 245202:43zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Y, Li Z (2009) Zhang neural network for online solution of time-varying convex quadratic program subject to time-varying linear-equality constraints. Phys Lett A 373:1639–1643CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y (2005) Revisit the analog computer and gradient-based neural system for matrix inversion Proceedings IEEE international symposium on intelligent control, pp 1411–1416Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang Y, Chen K, Tan HZ (2009) Performance analysis of gradient neural network exploited for online time-varying matrix inversion. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 54:1940–1945MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang Y, Yi C, Guo D, Zheng J (2011) Comparison on Zhang neural dynamics and gradient-based neural dynamics for online solution of nonlinear time-varying equation. Neural Comput App 20:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2012) Two new types of Zhang neural networks solving systems of time-varying nonlinear inequalities. IEEE Trans Circuit Syst I 59(10):2363–2373MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2011) Zhang neural network versus gradient neural network for solving time-varying linear inequalities. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(10):1676–1684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin L, Zhang Y, Li S (2016) Integration-enhanced Zhang neural network for real-time-varying matrix inversion in the presence of various kinds of noises. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learning Syst 27(12):2615–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) From different Zhang functions to various ZNN models accelerated to finite-time convergence for time-varying linear matrix equation. Inform Process Lett 39(3): 309–326Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jin L, Zhang Y, Qiu B (2016) Neural network-based discrete-time Z-type model of high accuracy in noisy environments for solving dynamic system of linear equations. Neural Comput. App., Accepted, doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2640-x
  23. 23.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) Solving time-varying inverse kinematics problem of wheeled mobile manipulators using Zhang neural network with exponential convergence. Nonlinear Dyn 76: 1543–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jin L, Zhang Y, Li S, Zhang Y (2016) Modified ZNN for time-varying quadratic programming with inherent tolerance to noises and its application to kinematic redundancy resolution of robot manipulators. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 63(11): 6978–6988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liao B, Zhang Y, Jin L (2016) Taylor o(h 3) discretization of ZNN Models for dynamic equality-constrained quadratic programming with application to manipulators. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learning Syst 27(2):225–237MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2013) Acceleration-level repetitive motion planning and its experimental verification on a six-link planar robot manipulator. IEEE Trans Contr Syst Tech 21(3): 906–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xiao L, Zhang Y (2014) A new performance index for the repetitive motion of mobile manipulators. IEEE Trans Cybern 44(2):280–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhat SP, Bernstein DS (2000) Finite-time stability of continuous autonomous systems. SIAM J Control Optim 38:751–766MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Forti M, Grazzini M, Nistri P, Pancioni L (2006) Generalized Lyapunov approach for convergence of neural networks with discontinuous or non-Lipschitz activations. Phys D 214:88–99MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lu W, Chen T (2006) Dynamical behaviors of delayed neural network systems with discontinuous activation functions. Neural Comput 18:683–708MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marco M, Forti M, Grazzini M (2006) Robustness of convergence in finite time for linear programming neural networks. Int J Circuit Theory Appl 34:307–316CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Science and EngineeringJishou UniversityJishouChina

Personalised recommendations