Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 28, Issue 6, pp 1293–1307 | Cite as

Recurrent ANN-based modelling of the dynamic evolution of the surface roughness in grinding

  • A. Arriandiaga
  • E. Portillo
  • J. A. Sánchez
  • I. Cabanes
  • Asier Zubizarreta
Engineering Applications of Neural Networks

Abstract

Grinding is critical in modern manufacturing due to its capacity for producing high surface quality and high-precision parts. One of the most important parameters that indicate the grinding quality is the surface roughness (R a). Analytical models developed to predict surface finish are not easy to apply in the industry. Therefore, many researchers have made use of artificial neural networks. However, all the approaches provide a particular solution for a wheel–workpiece pair, not generalizing to new grinding wheels. Besides, these solutions do not give surface roughness values related to the grinding wheel status. Therefore, in this work the modelling of the dynamic evolution of the surface roughness (R a) based on recurrent neural networks is presented with the capability to generalize to new grinding wheels and conditions taking into account the wheel wear. Results show excellent prediction of the surface finish dynamic evolution. The absolute maximum error is below 0.49 µm, being the average error around 0.32 µm. Besides, the analysis of the relative importance of the inputs shows that the grinding conditions have higher influence than the wheel characteristics over the prediction of the surface roughness confirming experimental knowledge of grinding technology users.

Keywords

Grinding Surface roughness Dynamic evolution modelling Recurrent neural networks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support received from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the FEDER operation program for funding the Project DPI2014-56137-C2-1-R and DPI2012-32882. This work was also supported in part by the Regional Government of the Basque Country through the Departamento de Educación, Universidades e Investigación (Project IT719-13) and UPV/EHU under Grant UFI11/28.

References

  1. 1.
    Marinescu ID, Hitchiner MP, Uhlmann E, Rowe WB, Inasaki I (2006) Handbook of machining with grinding wheels. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jiang J, Ge P, Hong J (2008) Study on micro-interacting mechanism modeling in grinding process and ground surface roughness prediction. Int J Adv Technol 67(5–8):1035–1052Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agarwal S, Rao PV (2010) Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in ceramic grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(12):1065–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aguiar PR, Cruz CED, Paula WCF (2008) Predicting surface roughness in grinding using neural networks. In: Arámburo J, Treviño AR (eds) Advances in robotics, automation and control. I-Tech, Vienna, Austria, pp 33–44Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vafaeesefat A (2009) Optimum creep feed grinding process conditions for Rene 80 supper alloy using neural network. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10:5–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sedighi M, Afshari D (2010) Creep feed grinding optimization by an integrated GA–NN system. Int J Intell Manuf 21:657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Q, Jin J (2010) Study on machining prediction in plane grinding based on artificial neural network. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent systems and knowledge engineering (ISKE), Hangzhou, China, 15–16 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li G, Liu J (2011) On-line prediction of surface roughness in cylindrical traverse grinding based on BP + GA algorithm. In: Proceedings of second international conference on mechanic automation and control engineering (MACE), Hohhot, China, 15–17 July 2001. pp 1456–1459Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nandi AK, Pratihar DK (2004) Design of a genetic-fuzzy system to predict surface finish and power requirement in grinding. Fuzzy Sets Syst 148:487–504MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Linke BS (2015) Review on grinding tool wear with regard to sustainability. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(6):060801-1–060801-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Olden JD, Jackson DA (2002) Illuminating the black box: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 154:135–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Girish KJ, Sinha K (2014) Time-delay neural networks for time series prediction: an application to the monthly wholesale price of oilseeds in India. Neural Comput Appl 24:563–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chae YT, Horesh R, Hwang Y, Lee YM (2016) Artificial neural network model for forecasting sub-hourly electricity usage in commercial buildings. Energy Build 111:184–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Y, Li J, Gu J, Zhou Z, Wang Z (2015) Artificial neural networks for infectious diarrhea prediction using meteorological factors in Shanghai (China). Appl Soft Comput 35:280–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laboissiere LA, Fernandes AS, Lage GG (2015) Maximum and minimum stock price forecasting of Brazilian power distribution companies based on artificial neural networks. Appl Soft Comput 35:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Godarzi AA, Amiri RM, Talaei A, Jamasb T (2014) Predicting oil price movements: a dynamic Artificial Neural Network approach. Energy Policy 68:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang H, Song G (2014) Innovative NARX recurrent neural network model for ultra-thin shape memory alloy wire. Neurocomputing 134:289–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vaz AGR, Elsinga B, van Sark WGJHM, Brito MC (2016) An artificial network to assess the impact of neighbouring photovoltaic systems in power forecasting in Utrecht, the Netherlands. Renew Energy 85:631–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crisostomi E, Gallicchio C, Micheli A, Raugi M, Tucci M (2015) Prediction of the Italian electricity price for smart grid applications. Neurocomputing 170:286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beale MH, Hagan MT, Demuth HB (2012) Neural Network Toolbox™ user’s guide. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arriandiaga A, Portillo E, Sánchez JA, Cabanes I, Pombo I (2014) Virtual sensors for on-line wheel wear and part roughness measurement in the grinding process. Sensors 14:8756–8778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dan Foresse, F, Hagan, MT (1997) Gauss–Newton approximation to Bayesian learning. In: International conference on neural networks, Houston, USA, 9–12 Jun 1997Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    LeCun Y, Kanter I, Solla SA (1991) Second-order properties of error surfaces: learning time and generalization. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 3:918–924Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Paliwal M, Kumar UA (2011) Assessing the contribution of variables in feed forward neural network. Appl Soft Comput 11:3690–3696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kemp SJ, Zaradic P, Hansen F (2007) An approach for determining relative input parameter importance and significance in artificial neural networks. Ecol Model 204:326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Arriandiaga
    • 1
  • E. Portillo
    • 1
  • J. A. Sánchez
    • 2
  • I. Cabanes
    • 1
  • Asier Zubizarreta
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Automatic Control and System EngineeringUniversity of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain

Personalised recommendations