Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 553–563 | Cite as

An artificial neural network model for predicting the CO2 reactivity of carbon anodes used in the primary aluminum production

  • Dipankar Bhattacharyay
  • Duygu Kocaefe
  • Yasar Kocaefe
  • Brigitte Morais
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Carbon anode is one of the key components for the electrolytic production of aluminum. It is mainly composed of calcined petroleum coke, coal tar pitch, and recycled carbon materials. The impurities in the raw materials, which are mainly by-products of different industries, influence significantly the quality of anodes. Usually, no well-known mathematical relationship exists between the various physical and chemical properties of raw materials and the final anode properties. In such situations, the artificial neural network (ANN) methods can serve as a useful tool to predict anode properties. In this study, published data have been used to show the proficiency of different artificial neural networks using the MATLAB software. The average error between the predicted and experimental values is around 6 %. The artificial neural network was also used to identify the effect of impurities such as, vanadium, iron, sodium, and sulfur on the CO2 reactivity of anodes. ANN also showed the effect of pitch percentage and coke porosity on the CO2 reactivity of anodes. The effect of CO2 and air reactivities of coke on the CO2 reactivity of anode was also studied. The predictions were found to be in good agreement with the results of other studies in the literature.

Keywords

Artificial neural network Carbon anode Aluminum Vanadium Iron CO2 reactivity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The technical and financial support of Aluminerie Alouette Inc. as well as the financial support of the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Développement économique Sept-Îles, the University of Québec at Chicoutimi (UQAC), and the Foundation of the University of Québec at Chicoutimi (FUQAC) are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Berezin AI, Polaykov PV, Rodnov OO, Klykov VA, Krylov VL (2002) Improvement of green anodes quality on the basis of the neural network model of the carbon plant workshop. Light Metals 605–608Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chmelar J (2006) Size reduction and specification of granular petrol coke with respect to chemical and physical properties. Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Milewski J, Świrski K (2009) Modelling the SOFC behaviours by artificial neural network. Int J Hydrogen Energy 34(13):5546–5553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biedler P, Banta L, Dai C, Love R, Tommey C, Berkow J (2002) Development of a state observer for an aluminum reduction cell. Light Metals 1091–1098Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meghlaoui A, Bui RT, Thibault J, Tikasz L, Santerre R (1998) Predictive control of aluminum electrolytic cells using neural networks. Metall Mater Trans B 29(5):1007–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li J, Zhou H, Guo T (2010) Research on fault diagnosis method based on modified elman neural network. 2nd international conference on information science and engineering (ICISE), pp 1456–1459Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boadu KD, Omani FK (2010) Adaptive control of feed in the Hall–Héroult cell using a neural network. JOM 62(2):32–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhattacharyay D, Kocaefe D, Kocaefe Y, Morrais B, Gagnon M (2013) Application of the artificial neural network (ANN) in predicting anode properties. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781118663189.ch201 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacharyay D, Kocaefe D, Kocaefe Y, Morrais B (2015) Comparison of linear multivariable, partial least square regression, and artificial neural network analyses to study the effect of different parameters on anode properties. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781119093435.ch189 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parthiban T, Ravi R, Kalaiselvi N (2007) Exploration of artificial neural network [ANN] to predict the electrochemical characteristics of lithium-ion cells. Electrochim Acta 53(4):1877–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pang G, Xu W, Zhai X, Zhou J (2004) Forecast and control of anode shape in electrochemical machining using neural network. Adv Neural Netw, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3174:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shang GQ (2008) Application of BP neural network for predicting anode accuracy in ECM. Int Symp Form Sci Eng 2:428–432Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang L, Apelian D, Makhlouf M, Huang W (2008) Predicting compositions and properties of aluminum die casting alloys using artificial neural network. Metall Sci Technol 26(1):16–21Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhagavatula YS, Bhagavatula MT, Dhathathreyan KS (2011) Application of artificial neural network in performance prediction of PEM fuel cell. Int J Energy Res 36(13):1215–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ray M, Ganguly S, Das M, Datta S, Bandyopadhyay NR, Hossain SM (2008) Artificial neural network (ANN)-based model for in situ prediction of porosity of nanostructured porous silicon. Mater Manuf Process 24(1):83–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panda DK, Bhoi RK (2005) Artificial neural network prediction of material removal rate in electro discharge machining. Mater Manuf Process 20(4):645–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fruhwirth RK, Filzwieser A (2007) Computational intelligence—neural computation in a copper refinery. EMC 2007:1–14Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Piuleac CG, Rodrigo MA, Cañizares P, Curteanu S, Sáez C (2010) Ten steps modeling of electrolysis processes by using neural networks. Environ Model Softw 25(1):74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vega JJ, Reynoso R (2008) Learning limits of an artificial neural network. F´ISICA S 54(1):22–29Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dursun E, Kilic O (2011) The Levenberg-Marquardt neural network model of the PEMFC’s MEA. In: 10th international conference on environment and electrical engineering (EEEIC), pp 1–4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu W (2012) Introduction to modeling biological cellular control systems, vol 6. Springer, MilanCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shmueli G, Patel NR, Bruce PC (2007) Data mining for business intelligence: concepts, techniques, and applications in Microsoft office excel withXLminer, 2nd edn. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tosta MRJ, Inzunza EM, Delgado LA (2009) Boron salt inhibitors of air reactivity of prebaked carbon anodes: literature review and laboratory studies. Light Metals 1173–1176Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bensah YD, Foosnaes T (2010) The nature and effect of sulphur compounds on CO2 and air reactivity of petrol coke. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 5(6):35–43Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eidet T, Sorlie M, Thonstad J (1997) Effects of sulphur, nickel and vanadium on the air and CO2 reactivity of cokes. Light Metals 436–437Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee JM, Baker JJ, Rolle JG, Llerena R (1998) Characterization of green and calcined coke properties used for aluminum anode-grade carbon. ACS Div Fuel Chem 43(2):271–277Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Perruchoud RC, Meier MW, Fischer WK (1996) Bath Impregnation of carbon anodes. Light Metals 673–679Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu FQ, Liu YX, Mannweiler U, Perruchoud R (2006) Effect of coke properties and its blending recipe on performances of carbon anode for aluminium electrolysis. J Central South Univ Technol 13(6):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tran K (2011) Influence of raw material properties and heat treatment temperature on the reactivity of carbon anodes. PhD Thesis. The University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pietrzyk SS, Thonstad J (2012) Influence of the sulphur content in the anode carbon in aluminium electrolysis—a laboratory study. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781118359259.ch113 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chevarin F, Lemieux L, Ziegler D, Fafard M, Alamdari H (2015) Air and CO2 reactivity of carbon anode and its constituents: an attempt to understand dusting phenomenon. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781119093435.ch192 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fang N, Xue J, Li X, Lang G, Gao S, Xia B, Jiang J, Bao C (2015) Effects of coke types and calcining levels on the properties of bench-scale anodes. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781119093435.ch193 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bonnetain L, Hoynant G (1965) Les Carbones. Tome 2, Masson et Cie, chap. XVII, pp 298–306Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Coste B, Schneider JP (2013) Influence of coke real density on anode reactivity consequence on anode baking. Light Metals. doi: 10.1002/9781118647745.ch11 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dipankar Bhattacharyay
    • 1
  • Duygu Kocaefe
    • 1
  • Yasar Kocaefe
    • 1
  • Brigitte Morais
    • 2
  1. 1.UQAC/AAI Research Chair on Carbon and REGAL Aluminum Research Center, Department of Applied SciencesUniversity of Quebec at ChicoutimiChicoutimiCanada
  2. 2.Aluminerie Alouette Inc.Sept-ÎlesCanada

Personalised recommendations