Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1707–1715 | Cite as

Fuzzy back-propagation network approach for estimating the simulation workload

Original Article

Abstract

Estimating the time required for simulating a factory online is a crucial topic in manufacturing. However, this topic has rarely been discussed. A fuzzy back-propagation network (FBPN) approach for estimating the workload of a simulation task according to the required simulation time is proposed in this paper. In the proposed FBPN approach, tasks for which simulation times cannot be effectively estimated are considered as outliers and excluded, and therefore, more appropriate lower and upper bounds on the simulation time can be set. Thus, the ranges of all simulation times can be efficiently narrowed; however, this decrease is achieved at the expense of a slight decrease in the hit rate, which is still tolerable. A real case containing data of 90 simulation tasks was used to validate the proposed methodology. In addition, two existing FBPN methods, the adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system method and the Chen (Comput Ind Eng 66:834–848, [2013]) method, were applied to these tasks for comparison. The experimental results showed that the proposed methodology was superior to the two existing FBPN methods in estimating precision and accuracy.

Keywords

Simulation Workload estimation Fuzzy Back-propagation network 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study is financially supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan.

References

  1. 1.
    Zott C (2003) Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intraindustry differential firm performance: insights from a simulation study. Strateg Manag J 24(2):97–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen T (2014) Strengthening the competitiveness and sustainability of a semiconductor manufacturer with cloud manufacturing. Sustainability 6:251–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fujimoto RM (1987) Performance measurements of distributed simulation strategies. Defense Technical Information Center, Fort BelvoirGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amin MB, Vinnakota B (1999) Data parallel fault simulation. IEEE Trans Very Large Scale Integr Syst 7(2):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majumdar A, Ochieng WY (2007) Factors affecting air traffic controller workload: multivariate analysis based on simulation modeling of controller workload. J Transp Res Rec J 1788:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Meng W, Zhao G (2014) Effects of key simulation parameters on conical ring rolling process. Procedia Eng 81:286–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horikawa SI, Furuhashi T, Uchikawa Y (1992) On fuzzy modeling using fuzzy neural networks with the back-propagation algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):801–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen T (2003) A fuzzy back propagation network for output time prediction in a wafer fab. Appl Soft Comput 2(3):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jang JS (1992) Self-learning fuzzy controllers based on temporal backpropagation. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 3(5):714–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen T, Lin YC (2011) A collaborative fuzzy-neural approach for internal due date assignment in a wafer fabrication plant. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 7(9):5193–5210Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen T (2013) An effective fuzzy collaborative forecasting approach for predicting the job cycle time in wafer fabrication. Comput Ind Eng 66:834–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zimmermann HJ (1991) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tesauro G (1995) Temporal difference learning and TD-Gammon. Commun ACM 38(3):58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hans Raj K, Sharma RS, Srivastava S, Patvardhan C (2000) Modeling of manufacturing processes with ANNs for intelligent manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(6):851–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bonnans JF, Gilbert JC, Lemaréchal C, Sagastizábal CA (2006) Numerical optimization: theoretical and practical aspects. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediciton of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18(5–6):343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sukthomya W, Tannock J (2005) The optimization of neural network parameters using Taguchi’s design of experiments approach: an application in manufacturing process modeling. Neural Comput Appl 14(4):337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen T (2009) A fuzzy-neural knowledge-based system for job completion time prediction and internal due date assignment in a wafer fabrication plant. Int J Syst Sci 40(8):889–902CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jang JS (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23(3):665–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen T, Romanowski R (2013) Precise and accurate job cycle time forecasting in a wafer fabrication factory with a fuzzy data mining approach. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Natural Computing Applications Forum 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Feng Chia UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan, Republic of China

Personalised recommendations