Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 23, Supplement 1, pp 323–331 | Cite as

Hierarchical fuzzy CMAC control for nonlinear systems

  • Floriberto Ortiz Rodríguez
  • José de Jesús Rubio
  • Carlos R. Mariaca Gaspar
  • Julio César Tovar
  • Marco A. Moreno Armendáriz
Original Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

In this study, a novel indirect adaptive controller is introduced for a class of unknown nonlinear systems. The proposed method provides a simple control architecture that merges from the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC) network and hierarchical fuzzy logic; therefore, the complicated CMAC structure can be simplified. The overall adaptive scheme guarantees the uniform stability of the closed-loop system. A simulation is presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed methodology.

Keywords

Adaptive control Neural networks Fuzzy systems Nonlinear system 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the editors and reviewers for their valuable comments and insightful suggestions, which helped to improve this research significantly. The authors thank the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado, Comisión de Operación y Fomento de Actividades Académicas del IPN, and Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología for their help in this research. The first author thanks the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado of the IPN under Research Grand No. 20113187.

References

  1. 1.
    Aguilar-Ibañez CF (2009) The Lyapunov direct method for the stabilization of the ball on the actuated beam. Int J Control 82(12):2169–2178CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aguilar-Ibañez CF, Garrido Moctezuma R, Davila J (2012) Output feedback trajectory stabilization of the uncertainty DC servomechanism system. ISA Trans 51(6):801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angelov P, Kordon A (2010) Adaptive inferential sensors based on evolving fuzzy models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 40(2):529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angelov P (2011) Fuzzily connected multimodel systems evolving autonomously from data streams. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern 41(4):898–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albus JS (1975) A New approach to manipulator control: the cerebellar model articulation controller (CMAC). J Dyn Syst Meas Control Trans ASME 97:220–227Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen C-T (1998) Linear system theory and design, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, ISBN 0-19-511777-8Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen C-H (2012) Wavelet-based adaptive robust control for a class of MIMO uncertain nonlinear systems. Neural Comput Appl 21:747–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen C-S (2011) Supervisory adaptive tracking control of robot manipulators using interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic system. IET Control Theory Appl 5(15):1796–1807MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fan X, Zhang N, Teng S (2003) Trajectory planning and tracking of ball and plate system using hierarchical fuzzy control scheme. Fuzzy Sets Syst 144:297–312MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fan L-L, Song Y-D (2012) Neuro-adaptive model-reference fault-tolerant control with application to wind turbines. IET Control Theory Appl 6(4):475–486MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Han SI, Lee JM (2011) Friction and uncertainty compensation of robot manipulator using optimal recurrent cerebellar model articulation controller and elasto-plastic friction observer. IET Control Theory Appl 5(18):2120–2141MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hojati M, Gazor S (2002) Hybrid adaptive fuzzy identification and control of nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 10(2):198–210Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isidori A (1999) Nonlinear control systems II. Springer, Berlin, ISBN 1-85233-188-7Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jimenez-Lizarraga M, Basin M, Rodriguez-Ramirez P (2012) Robust mini–max regulator for uncertain non-linear polynomial systems. IET Control Theory Appl 6(7):963–970MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jimenez-Lizarraga M, Basin M, Rodriguez-Ramirez P, Rubio JJ (2012) Robust control of a nonlinear electrical oscillator modeled by buffing equation. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control 8(5(A)):2941–2952Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jiménez-Lizárraga M, Poznyak A (2012) Necessary conditions for Robust Stackelberg equilibrium in a multi-model differential game. Optim Control Appl Methods 33(5):595–613MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Knuplez A, Chowdhury A, Svecko R (2003) Modeling and control design for the ball and plate system. IEEE Int Conf Indus Technol 2:1064–1067Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leite D, Ballini R, Costa P, Gomide F (2012) Evolving fuzzy granular modeling from nonstationary fuzzy data streams. Evol Syst 3(2):65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lemos A, Caminhas W, Gomide F (2011) Multivariable Gaussian evolving fuzzy modeling system. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(1):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lin C-M, Lin M-H, Yeh R-G (2012) Synchronization of unified chaotic system via adaptive wavelet cerebellar model articulation controller. Neural Comput Appl. doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-1021-3
  21. 21.
    Lughofer E, Angelov P (2011) Handling drifts and shifts in online data streams with evolving fuzzy systems. Appl Soft Comput 11(2):2057–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lughofer E (2012) Single pass active learning with conflict and ignorance. Evol Syst 3:251–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lughofer E (2012) A dynamic split-and-merge approach for evolving cluster models. Evol Syst 3:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maciel L, Lemos A, Gomide F, Ballini R (2012) Evolving fuzzy systems for pricing fixed income options. Evol Syst 3:5–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Macnab CJB (2011) Neural-adaptive control using alternate weights. Neural Comput Appl 20:211–221MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pérez-Cruz JH, Poznyak A (2010) Control of nuclear research reactors based on a generalized hopfield neural network. Intell Autom Soft Comput 16(1):39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pérez Cruz JH, Ruiz Velázquez E, Rubio JJ, de Alba Padilla CA (2012) Robust adaptive neurocontrol of SISO nonlinear systems preceded by unknown deadzone. Math Probl Eng 2012:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pérez-Cruz JH, Rubio JJ, Ruiz-VelPázquez E, Solís-Perales G. (2012) Tracking control based on recurrent neural networks for nonlinear systems with multiple inputs and unknown deadzone. Abstr Appl Anal 2012:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pérez-Cruz JH, Alanis AY, Rubio JJ, Pacheco J (2012) System identification using multilayer differential neural networks: a new result. J Appl Math 2012:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pérez-Olvera CA (2009) Control visual difuso de un sistema no-lineal, CIC-IPN, Master thesisGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pérez-Olvera CA, Moreno-Armendáriz MA, Rubio-Espino E, Zaragoza-Díaz JO (2008) Modulo de visión por computadora en tiempo real para el control de un sistema plano-esfera. Res Comput Sci 38:283–293Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rubio JJ, Yu W (2006) A new discrete-time sliding-mode control with time-varying gain and neural identification. Int J Control 79(4):338–348CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rubio JJ, Yu W (2007) Stability analysis of nonlinear system identification via delayed neural networks. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II 54(2):161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rubio JJ, Angelov P, Pacheco J (2011) An uniformly stable backpropagation algorithm to train a feedforward neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(3):356–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rubio JJ, Torres C, Aguilar C (2011) Optimal control based in a mathematical model applied to robotic arms. Int J Innov Comput Info Control 7(8):5045–5062Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rubio JJ (2012) Modified optimal control with a backpropagation network for robotic arms. IET Control Theory Appl 6(14):2216–2225MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rubio JJ, Figueroa M, Pérez-Cruz JH, Bejarano FJ (2012) Geometric approach and structure at infinite controls for the disturbance rejection. IET Control Theory Appl 6(16):2528–2537MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rubio JJ, Figueroa M, Pérez Cruz JH, Rumbo J (2012) Control to stabilize and mitigate disturbances in a rotatory inverted pendulum. Mexican J Phys E 58(2):107–112Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang LX (1994) Adaptive fuzzy systems and control. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang C, Lin Y (2012) Decentralised adaptive dynamic surface control for a class of interconnected non-linear systems. IET Control Theory Appl 6(9):1172–1181Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yoo SJ (2012) Adaptive neural output-feedback control for a class of non-linear systems with unknown time-varying delays. IET Control Theory Appl 6(1):130–140MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yen M-C, Hsu C-F, Chung I-H (2012) Design of a CMAC-based smooth adaptive neural controller with a saturation compensator. Neural Comput Appl 21:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yu W, Panuncio F, Li X (2011) Two-stage neural sliding-mode control of magnetic levitation in minimal invasive surgery. Neural Comput Appl 20:1141–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Floriberto Ortiz Rodríguez
    • 2
  • José de Jesús Rubio
    • 1
  • Carlos R. Mariaca Gaspar
    • 2
  • Julio César Tovar
    • 2
  • Marco A. Moreno Armendáriz
    • 3
  1. 1.Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, ESIME AzcapotzalcoInstituto Politecnico NacionalMexicoMexico
  2. 2.Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica, ZacatencoInstituto Politécnico NacionalMexicoMexico
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Tiempo Real y Automatización, Centro de Investigación en ComputaciónInstituto Politécnico NacionalMexicoMexico

Personalised recommendations