Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 24, Issue 7–8, pp 1639–1645 | Cite as

Observer-based control for time-varying delay neural networks with nonlinear observation

  • V. N. PhatEmail author
  • T. Fernando
  • H. Trinh
Original Article

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of designing observer-based controllers for a class of delayed neural networks with nonlinear observation. The system under consideration is subject to nonlinear observation and an interval time-varying delay. The nonlinear observation output is any nonlinear Lipschitzian function and the time-varying delay is not required to be differentiable nor its lower bound be zero. By constructing a set of appropriate Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals and utilizing the Newton–Leibniz formula, some delay-dependent stabilizability conditions which are expressed in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) are derived. The derived conditions allow simultaneous computation of two bounds that characterize the exponential stability rate of the closed-loop system. The unknown observer gain and the state feedback observer-based controller are directly obtained upon the feasibility of the derived LMIs stabilizability conditions. A simulation example is presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed result.

Keywords

Neural networks Observer-based control Nonlinear observation Interval time-varying delay Linear matrix inequalities Lyapunov–Krasovskii functionals 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council under the Discovery grant DP130101532 and the National Foundation for Science and Technology Development, Vietnam, grant number 101.01-2011.51.

References

  1. 1.
    Arik S (2003) Global asymptotic stability of a larger class of neural networks with constant time delay. Phys Lett A 311:504–511CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunt KJ, Sbarbaro D, Zbikowski R, Gawthrop PJ (1992) Neural networks for control systems: a survey. Automatica 28:1083–1112MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kao Y, Gao C, Han W (2010) Global exponential robust stability of reaction-diffusion interval neural networks with continuously distributed delays. Neural Comput Appl 19:867–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balasubramaniam P, Vembarasan V, Rakkiyappan R (2012) Global robust asymptotic stability analysis of uncertain switched Hopfield neural networks with time delay in the leakage term. Neural Comput Appl 21:1593–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu ZG, Park JH, Su H, Chu J (2012) Dissipativity analysis of stochastic neural networks with time delays. Nonlinear Dyn 70:825–839MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phat VN, Nam PT (2010) Exponential stability of delayed Hopfield neural networks with various activation functions and polytopic uncertainties. Phys Lett A 374:2527–2533CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hu W, Li C, Wu S (2012) Stochastic robust stability for neutral-type impulsive interval neural networks with distributed time-varying delays. Neural Comput Appl 21:1947–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu F, Wu M, He Y, Yokoyama R (2011) Improved delay-dependent stability analysis for uncertain stochastic neural networks with time-varying delay. Neural Comput Appl 20:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phat VN, Trinh H (2010) Exponential stabilization of neural networks with various activation functions and mixed time-varying delays. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 21:1180–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Senthilkumar T, Balasubramaniam P (2011) Robust \(H_\infty\) control for nonlinear uncertain stochastic T-S fuzzy systems with time delays. Appl Math Lett 24:1986–1994MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Senthilkumar T, Balasubramaniam P (2011) Delay-dependent robust \(H_\infty\) control for uncertain stochastic T-S fuzzy systems with time-varying state and input delays. Int J Syst Sci 42:877–887MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senthilkumar T, Balasubramaniam P (2011) Delay-dependent robust stabilization and \(H_\infty\) control for nonlinear stochastic systems with Markovian jump parameters and interval time-varying delays. J Optim Theory Appl 151:100–120MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yang X, Huang C, Cao J (2012) An LMI approach for exponential synchronization of switched stochastic competitive neural networks with mixed delays. Neural Comput Appl 21:2033–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu ZG, Park JH, Su H, Chu J (2012) Discontinuous Lyapunov functional approach to synchronization of time-delay neural networks using sampled-data. Nonlinear Dyn 69:2021–2030MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ji DH, Jeong SC, Park JH, Won SC (2012) Robust adaptive backstepping synchronization for a class of uncertain chaotic systems using fuzzy disturbance observer. Nonlinear Dyn 69:1125–1136MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wen Y, Ren X (2011) Neural networks-based adaptive control for nonlinear time-varying delays systems with unknown control direction. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22:1599–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Phat VN, Trinh H (2012) Design of \(H_\infty\) control of neural networks with time-varying delays. Neural Comput Appl (in press). doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-0820-x
  18. 18.
    Mahmoud MS (2009) New exponentially convergent state estimation method for delayed neural networks. Neurocomputing 72:3935–3942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li T, Fie S, Lu H (2010) Improved results on state estimation for neural networks with time-varying delays. J Control Theory Appl 8:215–221MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cheng X, Gui W, Gan Z (2009) Stability analysis and controller design for a class of delay systems via observer based on network. J Control Theory Appl 7:328–324MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lien CH (2004) An efficient method to design robust observer-based control of uncertain linear systems. Appl Math Comput 158:29–44MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kwon OM, Park JH, Lee SM, Won SC (2006) LMI optimization approach to observer-based controller design of uncertain time-delay systems via delayed feedback. J Optim Theory Appl 128:103–117MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chen JD (2007) Robust \(H_\infty\) output dynamic observer-based control of uncertain time-delay systems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 31:391–403MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trinh H, Fernando T (2012) Functional observer for dynamical systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ivanescu D, Dion JM, Dugard L, Niculescu SI (2000) Dynamical compensation for time-delay systems: an LMI approach. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 10:611–628MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Park JH (2004) On the design of observer-based controller of linear neutral delay-differential systems. Appl Math Comput 150:195–202MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lakshmanan S, Park JH, Ji DH, Jung HY, Nagamani G (2012) State estimation of neural networks with time-varying delays and Markovian jumping parameter based on passivity theory. Nonlinear Dyn 70:1421–1434MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gahinet P, Nemirovskii A, Laub AJ, Chilali M (1994) The LMI control toolbox. In: Proceedings of the 33rd conference on decision and control, Florida, pp 2038–2041Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Boyd S, Ghaoui LE, Feron E, Balakrishnan V (1994) Linear matrix inequalities in system and control theory. SIAM, PhiladenphiaCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gu K, Kharitonov VL, Chen J (2003) Stability of time-delay systems. Birkhauser, BostonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics, VASTHanoiVietnam
  2. 2.School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
  3. 3.School of EngineeringDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations