Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 31, Supplement 2, pp 759–766 | Cite as

Prediction water absorption resistance of lightweight geopolymers by artificial neural networks

  • Ali NazariEmail author
Original Article
  • 255 Downloads

Abstract

In the present work, water absorption of lightweight geopolymers produced by fine fly ash, rice husk bark ash and palm oil clinker (POC) aggregates has been modeled based on artificial neural networks. To build the models, training, validating and testing using experimental results from 144 specimens were conducted. The data used in the multilayer feed-forward neural networks models are arranged in a format of six input parameters that cover the quantity of fine POC particles, the quantity of coarse POC particles, the quantity of FA+RHBA mixture, the ratio of alkali activator to ashes mixture, the age of curing and the test trial number. According to these input parameters, in the neural networks models, the water absorption of each specimen was predicted. The best value of R2 was 0.9972 and the minimum value of that was 0.8301. The training, validating and testing results in the neural networks model have shown a strong potential for predicting the water absorption of the geopolymer specimens.

Keywords

Geopolymer Water absorption Ashes mixture Palm oil clinker ANNs 

References

  1. 1.
    Wongpa J, Kiattikomol K, Jaturapitakkul C, Chindaprasirt P (2010) Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and water permeability of inorganic polymer concrete. Mater Design 31:4748–4754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lloyd RR, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ (2009) Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1: remnant fly ash particles. J Mater Sci 44:608–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar S, Kumar R, Mehrotra SP (2010) Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J Mater Sci 45:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Álvarez-Ayuso E, Querol X, Plan F, Alastuey A, Moreno N, Izquierdo M, Font O, Moreno T, Diez S, Vázquez E, Barra M (2008) Environmental, physical and structural characterisation of geopolymer matrixes synthesised from coal (co-)combustion fly ashes. J Hazard Mater 154:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sata V, Jaturapitakkul C, Kiattikomol K (2007) Influence of pozzolan from various byproduct materials on mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 21(7):1589–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tangchirapat W, Buranasing R, Jaturapitakkul C, Chindaprasirt P (2008) Influence of rice husk—bark ash on mechanical properties of concrete containing high amount of recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 22(8):1812–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nazari A, Bagheri A, Riahi S (2011) Properties of geopolymer with seeded fly ash and rice husk bark ash. Mater Sci Eng, A 528:7395–7401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohammed BS, Al-Ganad MA, Abdullahi M (2011) Analytical and experimental studies on composite slabs utilising palm oil, clinker concrete. Constr Build Mater 25:3550–3560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pala M, Ozbay O, Oztas A, Yuce MI (2005) Appraisal of long-term effects of fly ash and silica fume on compressive strength of concrete by neural networks. Constr Build Mater 21(2):384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pak J, Jang J, Bhadeshia HKDH, Karlsson L (2009) Optimization of neural network for Charpy toughness of steel welds. Mater Manuf Process 24:16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cottrell GA, Kemp R, Bhadeshia HKDH, Odette GR, Yamamoto T (2007) Neural network analysis of Charpy transition temperature of irradiated low-activation martensitic steels. J Nucl Mater 367–370:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nazari A, Riahi S, Bagheri A (2012) Designing water resistant lightweight geopolymers produced from waste materials. Mater Des 35:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nazari A, Khalaj G (2012) Prediction compressive strength of lightweight geopolymers by ANFIS. Ceram Int 38:4501–4510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nazari A (2012) Fuzzy logic for prediction water absorption of lightweight geopolymers produced from waste materials. Ceram Int 38:4729–4736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nazari A (2012) Utilizing ANFIS for prediction water absorption of lightweight geopolymers produced from waste materials. Neural Comput Appl. doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-0934-1 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nazari A (2012) Fuzzy logic-based prediction of compressive strength of lightweight geopolymers. Neural Comput Appl. doi: 10.1007/s00521-012-1009-z Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ASTM C642 (2001) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. ASTM, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Topcu IB, Karakurt C, Sarıdemir M (2008) Predicting the strength development of cements produced with different pozzolans by neural network and fuzzy logic. Mater Des 29:1986–1991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ince R (2004) Prediction of fracture parameters of concrete by artificial neural networks. Eng Fract Mech 71(15):2143–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sarıdemir M, Topcu IB, Ozcan F, Severcan MH (2009) Prediction of long-term effects of GGBFS on compressive strength of concrete by artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Constr Build Mater 23:1279–1286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu SW, Huang JH, Sung JC, Lee CC (2002) Detection of cracks using neural networks and computational mechanics. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 191(25–26):2831–2845CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gunaydın HM, Dogan SZ (2004) A neural network approach for early cost estimation of structural systems of building. Int J Proj Manage 22(7):595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suratgar AA, Tavakoli MB, Hoseinabadi A (2005) Modified Levenberg–Marquardt method for neural networks training. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 6:46–48Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guzelbey Ibrahim H, Cevik A, ve Erklig A (2006) “Prediction of web crippling strength of cold-formed steel sheetings using neural networks”. J Constr Steel Res 62:962–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Topcu IB, Sarıdemir M (2008) Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing fly ash using artificial neural network and fuzzy logic. Comp Mater Sci 41(3):305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringIslamic Azad UniversitySavehIran

Personalised recommendations