Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 441–452 | Cite as

Triaxial compression behavior of sand and tire wastes using neural networks

  • Ayse Edincliler
  • Ali Firat Cabalar
  • Ahmet Cagatay
  • Abdulkadir Cevik
Original Article

Abstract

Tire waste additions to sand enhance the shear strength of sand for embankments. Granular and fiber shape tire wastes and their mixture with sand under drained and undrained conditions were tested in triaxial compression apparatus and modeled using neural networks (NN). In the experimental study, tire crumb and tire buffings inclusions were used at varying contents as soil reinforcement. Both quick tests and consolidated drained (CD) triaxial tests were performed to analyze the effects of tire content, tire shape, and tire aspect ratio on the shear strength of sand. Then, this extensive experimental database obtained in laboratory was used in training, testing, and prediction phases of three neural network-based soil models. The input variables in the developed NN models are tire wastes content, tire wastes type, test type, effective stress, and axial strain, and the output is the deviatoric stress. The accuracy of proposed models seems to be satisfactory. Furthermore, the proposed models are also presented as simple explicit mathematical functions for further use by researchers.

Keywords

Triaxial compression test Sand Tire wastes Shear strength Neural networks 

References

  1. 1.
    RMA (2006) Scrap tire markets in the United States, Rubber Manufacturers Association, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zornberg JG, Cabral AR, Viratjandr C (2004) Behaviour of tire shred-sand mixtures. Can Geotech J 41:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moo-Young H, Sellasie K, Zeroka D, Sabnis G (2003) Physical and chemical properties of recycled tire shreds for use in construction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 129(10):921–929Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foose GJ, Benson CH, Bosscher PJ (1996) Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 122(9):760–767Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hataf N, Rahimi MM (2005) Experimental investigation of bearing capacity of sand reinforced with randomly distributed tire shreds. Construct Build Mater 20:910–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Attom MF (2005) The use of shredded waste tires to improve the geotechnical engineering properties of sands. Env Geol 49:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gotteland P, Lambert S, Balachowski L (2005) Strength characteristics of tyre chips-sand mixtures. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica 17:1–2Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Venkatappa Rao G, Dutta RK (2006) Compressibility and strength behaviour of sand-tyre chip mixtures. Geotech Geol Eng 24:711–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Humphrey D, Sandford T, Cribbs M, Manison W (1993) Shear strength and compressibility of tire chips for use as retaining wall backfill, transportation research record 1422. Transportation Research Board, Washington, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tatlisoz N, Edil TB, Benson CH (1998) Interaction between reinforcing geosynthetics and soil-tire chip mixtures. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 124(11):1109–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edincliler A, Baykal G, Dengili K (2004) Determination of static and dynamic behavior of recycled materials for highways, resources. Conserv Recycl 42:223–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edincliler A, Baykal G, Saygili A (2009) Influence of different processing techniques on the mechanical properties of used tires in embankment construction. Waste Manag 30(6):1073–1080Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cagatay A (2008) Investigation of the effect of tire waste inclusions on the shear strength parameters of sand, MSc thesis, Bogazici UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gray DH, Ohashi H (1983) Mechanics of fiber reinforcing in sand. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 109:335–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ranjan G, Vasan RM, Charan HD (1996) Probabilistic analysis of randomly distributed fiber-reinforced soil. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 122:419–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Santoni R, Tingle J, Webster SL (2001) Engineering properties of sand-fiber mixtures for road construction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 127(3):258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Michalowski RL, Cernak J (2003) Triaxial compression of sand reinforced with fibers. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 129(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yetimoglu T, Salbas O (2003) A study on shear strength of sands reinforced with randomly distributed discrete fibers. Geotext Geomembranes 21:103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li C, Zornberg JG (2003) Validation of discrete framework for fiber-reinforcement, Proc. Two Rivers Conference, North American Geosynthetics Society, Winnipeg, Canada, Session 10EGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghiassian H, Poorebrahim G, Gray DH (2004) Soil reinforcement with recycled carpet wastes. Waste Manag Res 22:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Humphrey DN, Manion WP (1992) Properties of tire chips for lightweight fill. Proceedings of the Conference on Grouting, Soil Improvement, and Geosynthetics, ASCE, 2:1344–1355Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ahmed I, Lovell CW (1993) Rubber soils as lightweight geomaterial. Transp Res Rec 1422:61–70Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edil TB, Bosscher PJ (1994) Engineering properties of tire chips and soil mixtures. Geotech Test J 17(4):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zimmerman PS (1997) Compressibility, hydraulic conductivity, and soil infiltration testing of tire shreds and field testing of a shredded tire horizontal drain, M.S. thesis, Iowa State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bernal A (1996) Laboratory study on the use of tire shreds and rubber-sand in backfills and reinforced soil applications, Ph.D. thesis, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Masad E, Taha R, Ho C, Papagiannakis T (1996) Engineering properties of tire/soil mixtures as a lightweight fill material. Geotech Test J 19(3):297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu WY, Benda CC, Cauley RF (1997) Triaxial determination of shear strength of tire chips. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 123(5):479–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghazavi M (2004) Shear strength characteristics of sand-mixed with granular rubber. Geotech Geol Eng 22:401–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haykin S (2000) Neural networks: a comprehensive survey. Pearson Education, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation parallel distributed processing: exploration in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (Chapter 8)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zupan J, Gasteiger J (1993) Neural networks for chemists- an introduction. VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sidarta DE (2000) Neural network-based constitutive modeling of granular material, Ph.D. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yagawa C, Okuda H (1996) Neural networks in computational mechanics. Arch Comp Methods Eng 4:435–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Waszczyszyn Z (1998) Some new results in applications of backpropagation neural networks in structural and civil engineering. Advances in engineering computational technology. Civil-Comp Press, Edinburgh, pp 173–187Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kortesis S, Panagiotopoulos PD (1993) Neural networks for computing in structural analysis: methods and prospects of applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36:2305–2318zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waszczyszyn Z (2000) Neural networks in plasticity: some new results and prospects of applications, European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMASGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wu X (1991) Neural network-based material modeling. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Basheer IA (1988) Neuromechanistic-based modeling and simulation of constitutive behavior of fine-grained soils Ph.D. thesis, Kansas State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ghaboussi J, Garret JH Jr, Wu X (1990) Material modeling with neural networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Numerical Methods in Engineering: Theory and Applications, Swansea, UK, pp 701–717Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ghaboussi J, Garret JH Jr, Wu X (1991) Knowledge-based-modeling of material behavior with neural networks. J Eng Mech ASCE 117(1):132–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Penumadu D, Jin-Nan L, Chameau J-L, Sandarajah A (1994) Anisotropic rate dependent behavior of clays using neural networks. In Proc. XIIIICSMFE, ICSMFE, New Delhi, India, 4, pp. 1445–1448Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ellis GW, Yao C, Zhao R, Penumadu D (1995) Stress-strain modeling of sands using artificial neural networks. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 121(5):429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhu J-H, Zaman MM, Anderson SA (1998) Modelling of shearing behaviour of a residual soil with recurrent neural network. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 22(8):671–687zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayse Edincliler
    • 1
  • Ali Firat Cabalar
    • 2
  • Ahmet Cagatay
    • 3
  • Abdulkadir Cevik
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earthquake EngineeringBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of GaziantepGaziantepTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringBogazici UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations