Advertisement

Neural Computing and Applications

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 507–514 | Cite as

A motion location based video watermarking scheme using ICA to extract dynamic frames

  • Zhaowan Sun
  • Ju Liu
  • Jiande Sun
  • Xinghua Sun
  • Jie Ling
ISNN 2008

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel video watermarking scheme based on motion location. In the proposed scheme, independent component analysis is used to extract a dynamic frame from two successive frames of original video, and the motion is located by using the variance of 8 × 8 block in the extracted dynamic frame. Then according to the located motion, we choose a corresponding region in the former frame of the two successive frames, where watermark is embedded by using the quantization index modulation algorithm. The procedure above is repeated until each frame of the video (excluding the last one) is watermarked. The simulations show that the proposed scheme has a good performance to resist Gaussian noising, MPEG2 compression, frame dropping, frame cropping, etc.

Keywords

Video watermarking Motion location ICA QIM Watson’s perceptual model 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University Education Ministry of China (NCET-05-0582), the Excellent Youth Scientist Award Foundation of Shandong Province (No. 2007BS01023; No. 2007BS01006), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (No. 20050422017), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60872024), Cultivation Fund of the Key Scientific and Technical Innovation Project (NO. 708059) and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. Y2007G04).

References

  1. 1.
    Doërr G, Dugelay JL (2003) A guide tour of video watermarking. Signal Process Image Commun 18(4):263–282. doi: 10.1016/S0923-5965(02)00144-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox IJ, Miller ML (2002) The first 50 years of electronic watermarking. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process 2:126–132. doi: 10.1155/S1110865702000525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langelaar GC, Setyawan I, Lagendijk RL (2000) Watermarking digital image and video data: a state-of-the-art overview. IEEE Signal Process Mag 17(5):20–46. doi: 10.1109/79.879337 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhu B, Swanson MD, Tewfik AH (1998) Multiresolution scene-based video watermarking using perceptual models. IEEE J Sel Areas Comm 16(4):540–550. doi: 10.1109/49.668976 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun J, Liu J (2005) A temporal desynchronization resilient video watermarking scheme based on independent component analysis. IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP 2005) 1:265–268Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang J, Li J, Zhang L (2001) Video watermark technique in motion vector. Proceedings of XIV Brazilian symposium on computer graphics and image processing: 179–182Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Comon P (1994) Independent component analysis, a new concept? Signal Process 36:287–314. doi: 10.1016/0165-1684(94)90029-9 MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Nie K, He Z (2001) Blind separation by redundancy reduction in a recurrent neural network. Chin J Electron 10(3):415–419Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyvarinen A, Oja E (1997) A fast fixed-point algorithm for independent component analysis. Neural Comput 9(7):1483–1492. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.7.1483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hyvarinen A (1999) Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 10(3):626–634. doi: 10.1109/72.761722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen B, Wornell GW (2001) Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 47(4):1423–1443. doi: 10.1109/18.923725 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li Q, Cox IJ (2005) Using perceptual models to improve fidelity and provide invariance to valumetric scaling for quantization index modulation watermarking. IEEE international conference acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP 2005) 2:1–4 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li Q, Cox IJ (2007) Using perceptual models to improve fidelity and provide resistance to valumetric scaling for quantization index modulation watermarking. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 2(4):817–827. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2007.912369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun J, Liu J (2006) A novel blind video watermarking scheme based on independent dynamic component. Multidimens Syst Signal Process 17(1):59–74. doi: 10.1007/s11045-005-6235-4 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Watson AB (1993) DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images. human vision, visual processing, and digital display IV. Proc SPIE 1913:202–216. doi: 10.1117/12.152694
  16. 16.
    Cox IJ, Miller ML, Bloom JA (2001) Digital watermarking. Morgan Kaufmann, San MateoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations