Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feasibility, acceptability, and effects of behavior change interventions for improving multiple dietary behaviors among cancer survivors: a systematic review

Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to systematically identify and synthesize evidence on the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of behavior change interventions for improving multiple dietary behaviors among cancer survivors.

Methods

A total of 14 electronic databases and three trial registries were searched. Experimental studies that examined the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of behavior change interventions for improving multiple dietary behaviors among cancer survivors and published in English or Chinese peer-reviewed journals or protocols were considered eligible. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results

Six studies, with a sample size ranging from 50 to 3088, were included. The studies had a high overall risk of bias. Six studies reported feasibility data, and the average eligibility, recruitment, and retention rates at post-intervention were 60.7%, 66.7%, and 90.7%, respectively. Only one study measured the acceptability and reported that 66.6% of participants were satisfied with the intervention. Five out of the six studies that measured fruit and vegetable consumption reported statistically significant positive intervention effects. Two studies reported inconsistent intervention effects on wholegrain consumption. Only one study measured the consumption of processed meat, sugar, and alcohol, which had statistically nonsignificant intervention effect.

Conclusions

Behavior change interventions for improving multiple dietary behaviors might be feasible and effective to increase fruit and/or vegetable consumption among cancer survivors. Further research is needed to examine the acceptability and effects of the intervention for modifying other dietary behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

N/A

Code availability

N/A

References

  1. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH, Yabroff KR et al (2019) (2019) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 69(5):363–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F et al (2020) Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://gco.iarc.fr/. Accessed May 24, 2021

  3. Donin N, Filson C, Drakaki A, Tan HJ, Castillo A et al (2016) Risk of second primary malignancies among cancer survivors in the United States, 1992 through 2008. Cancer 122(19):3075–3086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaorsky NG, Churilla TM, Egleston BL, Fisher SG, Ridge JA et al (2017) Causes of death among cancer patients. Ann Oncol 28(2):400–407

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grosso G, Bella F, Godos J, Sciacca S, Del Rio D et al (2017) Possible role of diet in cancer: systematic review and multiple meta-analyses of dietary patterns, lifestyle factors, and cancer risk. Nutr Rev 75(6):405–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS et al (2012) Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin 62(4):243–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. Continuous Update Project Expert Report 2018. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer. Accessed May 24, 2021

  8. Schwedhelm C, Boeing H, Hoffmann G, Aleksandrova K, Schwingshackl L (2016) Effect of diet on mortality and cancer recurrence among cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Nutr Rev 74(12):737–748

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tollosa DN, Tavener M, Hure A, James EL (2019) Adherence to multiple health behaviours in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv 13(3):327–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho D, Park CL (2018) Barriers to physical activity and healthy diet among breast cancer survivors: a multilevel perspective. Eur J Cancer Care 27(1):e12772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee MK, Park SY, Choi GS (2019) Facilitators and barriers to adoption of a healthy diet in survivors of colorectal cancer. J Nurs Scholarsh 51(5):509–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryu SW, Son YG, Lee MK (2020) Motivators and barriers to adoption of a healthy diet by survivors of stomach cancer: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 44:101703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goode AD, Lawler SP, Brakenridge CL, Reeves MM, Eakin EG (2015) Telephone, print, and web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 9(4):660–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Paxton RJ, Garner W, Dean LT, Logan G, Allen-Watts K (2019) Health behaviors and lifestyle interventions in African American breast cancer survivors: a review. Front Oncol 9:3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sweeney-Magee M, Moustaqim-Barrette A, Gotay C, Dummer T (2020) A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors. J Adv Nurs 76(8):1936–1948

    Google Scholar 

  16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 134:178–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marijn Stok F, Renner B, Allan J, Boeing H, Ensenauer R et al (2018) Dietary behavior: an interdisciplinary conceptual analysis and taxonomy. Front Psychol 9:1689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Arends J, Bachmann P, Baracos V, Barthelemy N, Bertz H, Bozzetti F et al (2016) ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. Clin Nutr 36(1):11–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ligibel J (2012) Lifestyle factors in cancer survivorship. J Clin Oncol 30(30):3697–3704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacDonald DE, Cassin SE (2015) Nondieting psychological interventions for individuals who are overweight or obese: a systematic review of the evidence. Psychopathol Rev 4(3):290–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T et al (2021) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. http: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed May 24, 2021

  22. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R et al (2014) Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348:g1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J et al (2013) The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 46(1):81–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Befort CA, Bennett L, Christifano D, Klemp JR, Krebill H (2015) Effective recruitment of rural breast cancer survivors into a lifestyle intervention. Psycho-Oncol 24(4):487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blok AC, Blonquist TM, Nayak MM, Somayaji D, Crouter SE et al (2018) Feasibility and acceptability of “healthy directions” a lifestyle intervention for adults with lung cancer. Psycho-Oncol 27(1):250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grimmett C, Simon A, Lawson V, Wardle J (2015) Diet and physical activity intervention in colorectal cancer survivors: a feasibility study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 19(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lawler S, Maher G, Brennan M, Goode A, Reeves MM et al (2017) Get healthy after breast cancer—examining the feasibility, acceptability and outcomes of referring breast cancer survivors to a general population telephone-delivered program targeting physical activity, healthy diet and weight loss. Support Care Cancer 25(6):1953–1962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cartmel B, Bowen D, Ross D, Johnson E, Mayne ST (2005) A randomized trial of an intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake in curatively treated patients with early-stage head and neck cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14(12):2848–2854

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Greenlee H, Ogden Gaffney A, Aycinena AC, Koch P, Contento I et al (2016) Long-term diet and biomarker changes after a short-term intervention among Hispanic breast cancer survivors: the inverted exclamation markCocinar Para Su Salud! Randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25(11):1491–1502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pierce JP, Newman VA, Natarajan L, Flatt SW, Al-Delaimy WK et al (2007) Telephone counseling helps maintain long-term adherence to a high-vegetable dietary pattern. J Nutr 137(10):2291–2296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Blarigan EL, Kenfield SA, Chan JM, Van Loon K, Paciorek A et al (2020) Feasibility and acceptability of a web-based dietary intervention with text messages for colorectal cancer: a randomized pilot trial cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 29(4):752–760

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Del Valle MO, Martín-Payo R, Cuesta-Briand B, Lana A (2018) Impact of two nurse-led interventions targeting diet among breast cancer survivors: results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care 27(4):e12854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Arends J, Theobald S, Schmid J, Bartsch H (2014) Nutritional training increases long-term fruit and vegetable consumption in women with early breast cancer—a randomized controlled trial. Metab Nutr Oncol 02(01):e1–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Boutron I, Tubach F, Giraudeau B, Ravaud P (2004) Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials. J Clin Epidemiol 57(6):543–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Freedland KE, Mohr DC, Davidson KW, Schwartz JE (2011) Usual and unusual care: existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions. Psychosom Med 73(4):323–335

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Boushey CJ, Spoden M, Zhu FM, Delp EJ, Kerr DA (2017) New mobile methods for dietary assessment: review of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods. Proc Nutr Soc 76(3):283–294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ho DKN, Tseng SH, Wu MC, Shih CK, Atika AP et al (2020) Validity of image-based dietary assessment methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 39(10):2945–2959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gemming L, Utter J, Ni Mhurchu C (2015) Image-assisted dietary assessment: a systematic review of the evidence. J Acad Nutr Diet 115(1):64–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Carey RN, Connell LE, Johnston M, Rothman AJ, de Bruin M et al (2019) Behavior change techniques and their mechanisms of action: a synthesis of links described in published intervention literature. Ann Behav Med 53(8):693–707

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Toomey E, Hardeman W, Hankonen N, Byrne M, McSharry J et al (2020) Focusing on fidelity: narrative review and recommendations for improving intervention fidelity within trials of health behaviour change interventions. Health Psychol Behav Med 8(1):132–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Bell K (2012) Remaking the self: trauma, teachable moments, and the biopolitics of cancer survivorship. Cult Med Psychiatry 36(4):584–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bluethmann SM, Basen-Engquist K, Vernon SW, Cox M, Gabriel KP et al (2015) Grasping the ‘teachable moment’: time since diagnosis, symptom burden and health behaviors in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncol 24(10):1250–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Frazelle ML, Friend PJ (2016) Optimizing the teachable moment for health promotion for cancer survivors and their families. J Adv Pract Oncol 7(4):422

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Vijayvergia N, Denlinger CS (2015) Lifestyle factors in cancer survivorship: where we are and where we are headed. J Pers Med 5(3):243–263

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ (2017) Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res 17(1):88

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Fang X, Wei J, He X, An P, Wang H et al (2015) Landscape of dietary factors associated with risk of gastric cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Eur J Cancer 51(18):2820–2832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ferro A, Rosato V, Rota M, Costa AR, Morais S et al (2020) Meat intake and risk of gastric cancer in the stomach cancer pooling (StoP) project. Int J Cancer 147(1):45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Weng KG, Yuan YL (2017) Soy food intake and risk of gastric cancer: a dose-response metaanalysis of prospective studies. Medicine 96(33):e7802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the systematic review. GT and CH performed study selection, data extraction, quality appraisal, and data analysis; GT drafted the manuscript, and all authors revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-Lin Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

N/A

Consent to participate

N/A

Consent for publication

N/A

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gan, T., Cheng, HL. & Tse, M.M.Y. Feasibility, acceptability, and effects of behavior change interventions for improving multiple dietary behaviors among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 30, 2877–2889 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06582-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06582-2

Keywords

Navigation