Symptom burden among Northern Alberta radiotherapy patients with advanced cancer: mapping needs and gaps
Patients with advanced cancer often experience symptoms including pain, nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and depression. High symptom burden can be alleviated by multidisciplinary palliative care (PC) teams practicing symptom-directed management. Patients who are unable to access such services may be at higher risk of increased symptoms and poor outcomes.
A sequential exploratory mixed methods study was performed to explore the burden of symptoms experienced by Northern Alberta patients with advanced cancer. The symptom burden among patients from rural and remote communities was characterized in a retrospective review capturing basic demographic and clinicopathologic information, in addition to patient-reported outcomes. Symptom prevalence was evaluated against the nature and range of supportive care services available. Service accessibility was assessed at community level by surveying health care providers (HCPs) and performing thematic analysis on their responses.
From January 1 to December 31, 2017, 607 outpatients were seen in consultation in an integrated palliative radiotherapy clinic in Edmonton, Alberta. A total of 166 (27.3%) patients resided in Alberta communities designated as rural or remote. Patient-reported symptom prevalence and intensity of scores did not differ significantly between rural/remote and urban populations. Unmet practical needs were flagged significantly more often by patients from rural communities (p = 0.05). HCPs from rural community health centers in Northern Alberta were knowledgeable regarding PC services availability and referral processes within their communities.
Although the symptom burden experienced by patients living with advanced cancer in rural and remote areas of Northern Alberta does not differ significantly from their urban counterparts, and community HCPs are knowledgeable regarding PC services, unmet needs within these communities remain. Continuing support for PC services in rural communities, as well as establishing care pathways for patients from rural populations traveling to urban centers to receive treatment, will help to minimize the unmet needs these patients experience.
KeywordsRural palliative cancer care Palliative radiotherapy Patient reported outcomes Symptom burden
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The authors are in full control of the primary data and will provide if requested.
- 1.Senate of Canada (1995) Of life and death: a report of the Special Committee on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide. Issues Law Med 11(2):209–213Google Scholar
- 4.Strasser F, Sweeney C, Willey J, Benisch-Tolley S, Palmer JL, Bruera E (2004) Impact of a half-day multidisciplinary symptom control and palliative care outpatient clinic in a comprehensive cancer center on recommendations, symptom intensity, and patient satisfaction: a retrospective descriptive study. J Pain Symptom Manag 27(6):481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER, Abernethy AP, Balboni TA, Basch EM, Ferrell BR, Loscalzo M, Meier DE, Paice JA, Peppercorn JM, Somerfield M, Stovall E, von Roenn JH (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 30(8):880–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fairchild A, Pituskin E, Rose B, Ghosh S, Dutka J, Driga A, Tachynski P, Borschneck J, Gagnon L, Macdonnell S, Middleton J, Thavone K, Carstairs S, Brent D, Severin D (2009) The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic. Support Care Cancer 17(2):163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Bruera E et al. (1991) The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat CareGoogle Scholar
- 16.Watson L, Groff S, Tamagawa R, Looyis J, Farkas S, Schaitel B, DeIure A, Faris P, Bultz BD (2016) Evaluating the impact of provincial implementation of screening for distress on quality of life, symptom reports, and psychosocial well-being in patients with cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14(2):164–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.“Census metropolitan influenced zone” Statistics Canada (2015) http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/ref/dict/geo010-eng.cfm. Accessed June 2018
- 19.Tamagawa R, Groff S, Anderson J, Champ S, Deiure A, Looyis J, Faris P, Watson L (2016) Effects of a provincial-wide implementation of screening for distress on healthcare professionals' confidence and understanding of person-centered care in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 14(10):1259–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.“My Health Alberta” Government of Alberta (2018) https://myhealth.alberta.ca/journey/healthier-together/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed June 2018
- 21.Brazil K et al. (2013) "Comparing the experiences of rural and urban family caregivers of the terminally ill." Rural Remote Health 13.1Google Scholar