Effectiveness of therapeutic inflatable ball self-exercises for improving shoulder function and quality of life in breast cancer survivors after sentinel lymph node dissection
The survival rate of breast cancer survivors (BCSs) is > 90%. Particular issues are upper arm dysfunction caused by surgery and treatments. Physical activity has been recommended to improve shoulder function and quality of life (QoL) in BCSs. However, rehabilitation programs tend not to be continuous.
To explore the effectiveness of therapeutic inflatable ball self-exercise for improving shoulder function and QoL in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) following breast cancer surgery.
Patients and methods
Seventy-two BCSs were allocated to two groups, conventional self-exercise (CSE; n = 34; age, 48.9 ± 7.2 years) and therapeutic inflatable ball self-exercise (IBE; n = 38; age, 47.7 ± 8.9 years); 22 in the CSE and 23 in the IBE group completed the interventions. Both groups performed intervention for 12 weeks, three times per week and 15 min a day at least. Measurement was performed three times for shoulder range of motion (ROM), handgrip strength, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B).
Flexion and extension of shoulder ROM showed significant differences between the two groups at 12 weeks. Flexion and extension of shoulder ROM showed significant differences for t1-t2 (p = 0.02) and t0-t1 (p = 0.04). Abduction showed a significant difference for t0-t1 (p = 0.03), t1-t2 (p = 0.02), and t0-t2 (p = 0.01). CSE (7 points) and IBE (20 points) satisfied the MDC in FACT-B total score. The MDC of the SPADI total score was 13 points in the CSE group and 9 points in the IBE group.
IBE would be more appropriate to start the rehabilitation for BCSs and CSE would be effective after the pain has improved.
KeywordsBreast cancer Rehabilitation Shoulder pain and function Self-exercise Inflatable ball
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.McNeely ML, Campbell K, Ospina M, Rowe BH, Dabbs K, Klassen TP et al (2010) Exercise interventions for upper-limb dysfunction due to breast cancer treatment. Cochrane Database Systematic reviews (6)Google Scholar
- 7.Donatelli RA (2009) Physical therapy of the shoulder, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone Inc, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL (2018) Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthod 9(3):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sauer S, Biancalana M (2010) Trigger point therapy for low back pain. New Harbinger PublicationsGoogle Scholar
- 17.Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y (1991) Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheunatology 4(4):143–149Google Scholar
- 18.Norkin Cynthia C, White DJ (2016) Measurement of joint motion: a guide to goniometry. FA DavisGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cancer Research UK(2017) Exercises after breast reconstruction using muscle. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/breast-cancer/treatment/surgery/breast-reconstruction/exercises-back-muscles, Published July, 13, 2017
- 31.Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M (2011) Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (vas pain), numeric rating scale for pain (nrs pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (mpq), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (sf-mpq), chronic pain grade scale (cpgs), short form-36 bodily pain scale (sf-36 bps), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (icoap). Arthritis Care Res 63(S11):S240–S252CrossRefGoogle Scholar