Inclusion of children in the initial conversation about their cancer diagnosis: impact on parent experiences of the communication process
Including children in medical conversations is considered the standard of care for children with cancer. However, previous qualitative research has raised concerns about how the child’s presence impacts the parent’s communication experience. The current study examines the frequency and impact of child presence during a serious medical conversation on the parent’s communication experience in pediatric oncology.
Three hundred sixty parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer completed questionnaires assessing the child’s presence during the initial conversation with the oncologist about diagnosis and treatment and parental communication experiences. Primary oncologists completed a survey question about the child’s prognosis.
Sixty-one percent of children were present during the initial conversation, with lowest rates among children aged 3–6 (44%) and 7–12 (44%). Child presence was not associated with parents’ reports that they received prognostic information (p = 0.20), high-quality information (p = 0.19), or high-quality communication about the child’s cancer (p = 1.0).
The parent’s communication experience is not diminished by the choice to include the child. Given the bioethical imperative to include children in conversations about serious illness whenever possible, this concern should not be used to exclude children, but rather to give parents additional time of their own when needed to fully process decisions.
KeywordsPediatric hematology/oncology Psychosocial Communication Parents
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose. The study PIs have full control of all primary data. The data is not in a public repository, but that requests for data access will be considered individually and data made available if appropriate using processes consistent with those of our institution and IRB. We will consider requests for data access from reviewers if needed, again in compliance with institutional and IRB policy.
- 1.Spinetta JJ, Jankovic M, Masera G, Ablin AR, Barr RD, Arush MWB, D’Angio GJ, van Dongen-Melman J, Eden T, Epelman C, Martins AG, Greenberg ML, Kosmidis HV, Oppenheim D, Zeltzer PM (2009) Optimal care for the child with cancer: a summary statement from the SIOP Working Committee on Psychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 52(7):904–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Ranmal R, Prictor M, Scott J (2008) Interventions for improving communication with children and adolescents about their cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(4):CD002969Google Scholar
- 5.Spinetta JJ, Masera G, Eden T et al (2002) Refusal, non-compliance, and abandonment of treatment in children and adolescents with cancer. A report of the SIOP Working Committee on Phychosocial Issues in Pediatric Oncology. Pediatr Blood Cancer 38(2):114–117Google Scholar
- 6.Keim MC, Lehmann V, Shultz EL, Winning AM, Rausch JR, Barrera M, Jo Gilmer M, Murphy LK, Vannatta KA, Compas BE, Gerhardt CA (2017) Parent-child communication and adjustment among children with advanced and non-advanced cancer in the first year following diagnosis or relapse. J Pediatr Psychol 42:871–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Masera G, Chesler MA, Jankovic M et al (1997) SIOP Working Committee on psychosocial issues in pediatric oncology: guidelines for communication of the diagnosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer 28(5):382–385Google Scholar