Dyadic quality of life among heterosexual and sexual minority breast cancer survivors and their caregivers
- 26 Downloads
The number of informal caregivers to cancer survivors is increasing, and limited information is available about caregivers to sexual minority breast cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to assess dyadic quality of life among sexual minority cancer survivors and their caregivers compared with heterosexual cancer survivors and their caregivers.
We recruited 167 survivors of non-metastatic breast cancer of different sexual orientations and their caregivers, who were surveyed via telephone after obtaining consent. We used inverse propensity score weighting to account for differences by sexual orientation in age and length of the survivor-caregiver relationship, and simultaneous equation models consistent with the needs for analyzing dyadic data.
About 6–7 years after diagnosis, survivors and caregivers reported quality of life scores consistent with population norms, and there were no differences by survivors’ sexual orientation. With few exceptions, caregivers’ and survivors’ quality of life influenced one another directly, and these effects were stronger among sexual minority dyads than heterosexual dyads.
Because of the strength of sexual minority, survivors’ and their caregivers’ mutual influence on each other’s quality of life, interventions, and clinical care for sexual minority breast cancer survivors should consider their caregivers.
KeywordsBreast cancer Quality of life Caregiving Dyads Sexual minorities
The authors are grateful to the participants who took the time to respond to our questions and complete the survey.
Support for this research was provided by the American Cancer Society, Grant No. RSGT-06-135-01-CPPB PI: U. Boehmer. Additional supplemental funding was made available by the Boston University School of Public Health pilot grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.American Cancer Society (2016) Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2016-2017. vol web version. American Cancer Society, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
- 6.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Healthy People 2020. US Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jacobs JM, Shaffer KM, Nipp RD, Fishbein JN, MacDonald J, El-Jawahri A, Pirl WF, Jackson VA, Park ER, Temel JS, Greer JA (2017) Distress is interdependent in patients and caregivers with newly diagnosed incurable cancers. Ann Behav Med 51(4):519–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9875-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Kalemkerian G, Zalupski M, LoRusso P, Hayes DF, Hussain M, Ruckdeschel J, Fendrick AM, Trask PC, Ronis DL, Kershaw T (2013) Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psycho-oncology 22(3):555–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Badr H, Carmack CL, Diefenbach MA (2015) Psychosocial interventions for patients and caregivers in the age of new communication technologies: opportunities and challenges in cancer care. J Health Commun 20(3):328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2014.965369 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Boehmer U, Tripodis Y, Bazzi AR, Winter M, Clark MA (2016) Fear of cancer recurrence in survivor and caregiver dyads: differences by sexual orientation and how dyad members influence each other. J Cancer Surviv 10(5):802–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0526-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Ware JE, Kosinski M, Turner-Browker DM, Gandek B (2005) How to score version 2 of the SF-12 health survey (With a Supplement Documenting Version 1). QualityMetric Incorporated, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- 36.Cohen S, Williamson G (1988) Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S (eds) The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on applied social psychology. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
- 39.Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK (2000) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). In: Corcoran K, Fischer J (eds) Measures for Clinical Practice, vol 2. Adults. 3rd edn. The Free Press, New York, pp 502-503Google Scholar