Labeled as lucky: contradictions between what women and healthcare professionals experience regarding the need for help after the early stages of gynecological cancer
- 61 Downloads
To explore how participants perceived a nurse-led, person-centered intervention, Guided Self-Determination Gynecological Cancer (GSD-GYN-C) and how participants felt it influenced the challenges they faced and their rehabilitation after gynecological cancer surgery.
Participants were invited from a previously conducted randomized trial where GSD-GYN-C improved physical quality of life in the intervention group. Ten semi-structured interviews were conducted, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Three central themes were identified: (1) “labeled as the lucky ones,” which describes a contrast between the women’s perceived problems and the healthcare professionals’ tendency to stress their luck in being treated early and cured with no particular problems in sight, leading to an unintended delay in their rehabilitation process; (2) “personal reflections pave the way for change,” which shows how new problem-solving skills were mobilized when reflection sheets and dialogue on GSD-GYN-C provided new insight into their situation and the feeling of being taken seriously; and (3) “emerging relational competence,” which describes the new skills the women developed in interacting with family, friends, colleagues, and healthcare professionals.
As a supplement to usual care, GSD-GYN-C remedied a tendency among healthcare professionals to underestimate problems in the early stages of gynecological cancer, and GSD-GYN-C involved the women in their rehabilitation process characterized by active problem-solving in relationships with other people.
KeywordsGynecological cancer Rehabilitation Nurse-led intervention Guided self-determination Empowerment Self-management
The authors would like to thank the women and nurses who took part in the project including Mette Gotthardsen for assisting with interviews. We appreciate the Oncology Ward at Finsen Centre, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital, for contributing with workhours and financing the English translation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Kjær TK (2017) Sundhedsstyrelsen. Vidensopsamling på senfølger efter kræft hos voksne: Sundhedsstyrelsen. Available from: https://www.sst.dk/da/udgivelser/2017/~/media/67E78B9688DE444BA77743BC9705D899.ashx
- 2.Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C, ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group (2016) ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 26(1):2–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kristensen SE, Mosgaard BJ, Rosendahl M, Dalsgaard T, Bjorn SF, Froding LP et al (2017) Robot-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology: current status and controversies on patient benefits, cost and surgeon conditions - a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 96(3):274–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Danish H, Medicines A. Opfølgningsprogram for gynækologisk kræft [follow-up program for gynecological cancer]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Health and Medicines Authority; 2015. Contract No: ReportGoogle Scholar
- 11.WHO. Concept Paper. WHO guidelines on health-related rehabilitation (rehabilitation guidelines). 2011Google Scholar
- 12.Olesen ML, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Thranov IR, Thisted LB, Zoffmann V (2015) The psychosocial needs of gynaecological cancer survivors: a framework for the development of a complex intervention. European journal of oncology nursing: the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society 19(4):349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Zoffmann V (2004) Guided self-determination: a life skills approach developed in difficult type 1 diabetes. Fællestrykkeriet for Sundhedsvidenskab, Aarhus Universitet: Faculty of Health Sciences, University of AarhusGoogle Scholar
- 15.Olesen ML, Duun-Henriksen AK, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Andersen KK, Zoffmann V (2016) A person-centered intervention targeting the psychosocial needs of gynecological cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of cancer survivorship: research and practice 10(5):832–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2014. xviii) Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 3 ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, p 405Google Scholar
- 18.Sandsund C, Towers R, Thomas K, Tigue R, Lalji A, Fernandes A, Doyle N., Jordan J., Gage H., Shaw C. Holistic needs assessment and care plans for women with gynaecological cancer: do they improve cancer-specific health-related quality of life? A randomised controlled trial using mixed methods. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2017Google Scholar
- 23.Paltrinieri S, Fugazzaro S, Bertozzi L, Bassi MC, Pellegrini M, Vicentini M, Mazzini E, Costi S (2018) Return to work in European Cancer survivors: a systematic review. Supportive care in cancer: official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 26(9):2983–2994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kiserud CE, Dahl AA, Loge JH, Fossa SD. Cancer survivorship in adults. Recent results in cancer research Fortschritte der Krebsforschung Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer. 2014;197:103–20Google Scholar
- 27.Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006. xxv) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition, vol 506. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 31.Finderup J, Bjerre T, Soendergaard A, Nielsen ME, Zoffmann V. Developing life skills in haemodialysis using the guided self-determination method: a qualitative study. Journal of renal care 2015Google Scholar
- 32.Henshall CL, Greenfield SM, Gale NK. Typologies for restructuring relationships in cancer survivorship: temporal changes in social support and engagement with self-management practices. Cancer Nurs 2017Google Scholar
- 33.Olesen ML, Hansen MK, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Andersen KK, Zoffmann V (2018) The distress thermometer in survivors of gynaecological cancer: accuracy in screening and association with the need for person-centred support. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 26(4):1143–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International journal for quality in health care: journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care / ISQua 19(6):349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Saltbaek L, Karlsen RV, Bidstrup PE, Hoeg BL, Zoffmann V, Horsbol TA, et al. (2019) MyHealth: specialist nurse-led follow-up in breast cancer. A randomized controlled trial - development and feasibility. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden):1–8Google Scholar