A pilot survey of ventilated cancer patients’ perspectives and recollections of early mobility in the intensive care unit
To determine the level of recall, satisfaction, and perceived benefits of early mobility (EM) among ventilated cancer patients after extubation in the intensive care unit (ICU).
A survey of patients’ perceptions and recollections of EM was administered within 72 h of extubation. Data on recall of EM participation, activities achieved, adequacy of staffing and rest periods, strength to participate, activity level of difficulty, satisfaction with staff instructions, breathing management, and overall rating of the experience were analyzed. The Confusion Assessment Method for ICU (CAM-ICU) was used for delirium screening.
Fifty-four patients comprised the study group. Nearly 90% reported satisfaction with instructions, staffing, rest periods, and breathing management during EM. Participants indicated that EM maintained their strength (67%) and gave them control over their recovery (61%); a minority felt optimistic (37%) and safe (22%). Patients who achieved more sessions and “out-of-bed” exercises had better recall of actual activities compared with those who exercised in bed. Overall, patients with CAM-ICU-positive results (33%) performed less physical and occupational therapy exercises.
Ventilated cancer patients reported an overall positive EM experience, but factual memory impairment of EM activities was common. These findings highlight the needs and the importance of shaping strategies to deliver a more patient focused EM experience.
KeywordsEarly mobility Mechanical ventilation Satisfaction Perception Memory recall
Supported, in part, by the Core Grant (P30 CA008748) and the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
All the listed authors were involved in the study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, and manuscript drafting. Critical manuscript revision was performed by L.P.V., S.M.P., and N.A.H., and final manuscript approval was provided by all authors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Recommendations from the pilot were incorporated into the final version of the survey, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Informed consent was obtained from all study patients.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, Spears L, Miller M, Franczyk M, Deprizio D, Schmidt GA, Bowman A, Barr R, McCallister KE, Hall JB, Kress JP (2009) Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 373(9678):1874–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Needham DM, Korupolu R, Zanni JM, Pradhan P, Colantuoni E, Palmer JB, Brower RG, Fan E (2010) Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure: a quality improvement project. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91(4):536–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Davidson JE, Harvey MA, Bemis-Dougherty A, Smith JM, Hopkins RO (2013) Implementation of the pain, agitation, and delirium clinical practice guidelines and promoting patient mobility to prevent post-intensive care syndrome. Crit Care Med 41(9 Suppl 1):S136–S145. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a24105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hodgson CL, Bailey M, Bellomo R, Berney S, Buhr H, Denehy L, Gabbe B, Harrold M, Higgins A, Iwashyna TJ, Papworth R, Parke R, Patman S, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner E, Tipping C, Young P, Webb S, Trial of Early A, Mobilization Study I (2016) A binational multicenter pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial of early goal-directed mobilization in the ICU. Crit Care Med 44(6):1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001643 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Parry SM, Knight LD, Connolly B, Baldwin C, Puthucheary Z, Morris P, Mortimore J, Hart N, Denehy L, Granger CL (2017) Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Intensive Care Med 43(4):531–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4685-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Holdsworth C, Haines KJ, Francis JJ, Marshall A, O’Connor D, Skinner EH (2015) Mobilization of ventilated patients in the intensive care unit: an elicitation study using the theory of planned behavior. J Crit Care 30(6):1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.08.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Walker W, Wright J, Danjoux G, Howell SJ, Martin D, Bonner S (2014) Project Post Intensive Care eXercise (PIX): a qualitative exploration of intensive care unit survivors’ perceptions of quality of life post-discharge and experience of exercise rehabilitation. J Intensive Care Soc 16(1):37–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1751143714554896 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Burry L, Cook D, Herridge M, Devlin JW, Fergusson D, Meade M, Steinberg M, Skrobik Y, Olafson K, Burns K, Dodek P, Granton J, Ferguson N, Jacka M, Tanios M, Fowler R, Reynolds S, Keenan S, Mallick R, Mehta S, Investigators S, Canadian Critical Care Trials G (2015) Recall of ICU stay in patients managed with a sedation protocol or a sedation protocol with daily interruption. Crit Care Med 43(10):2180–2190. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001196 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Schwarzkopf D, Behrend S, Skupin H, Westermann I, Riedemann NC, Pfeifer R, Günther A, Witte OW, Reinhart K, Hartog CS (2013) Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Intensive Care Med 39(6):1071–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-013-2862-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.U.S. National Library of Medicine (2017) How to write easy-to-read health materials. https://medlineplus.gov/etr.html. Accessed 10 May 2018
- 23.Jolley SE, Regan-Baggs J, Dickson RP, Hough CL (2014) Medical intensive care unit clinician attitudes and perceived barriers towards early mobilization of critically ill patients: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Anesthesiol 14:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-84 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar