Prevalence and frequency of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors: the neglected roles of social relations and conscious living
To assess prevalence and frequency of use of self-management strategies among female cancer survivors and to empirically identify categories of self-management.
Female cancer survivors (N=673, mean age 51 years; >90% with breast cancer; M=5 years since diagnosis) completed an Internet survey indicating the frequency (never to very often) with which they had employed each strategy since diagnosis. The survey included commonly assessed self-management strategies, such as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), religious practices, and exercise. Additionally we assessed the use of further strategies identified from recommendations of cancer survivors shared in Internet forums.
A principal component analysis yielded five categories: More Conscious Living, Turning to Family/Friends, CAM, Religious/Spiritual Practices, and Exercise. Prevalence rates of commonly measured strategies like CAM, Religious Practices, and Exercise were similar to previous studies. Considering frequency of use, however, revealed that only few participants reported frequent use of these strategies (<10%). In contrast, about half of the women (>50%) reported Turning to Family/Friends and engaging in More Conscious Living strategies (very) often.
Relying on prevalence assessments of commonly investigated behaviors such as CAM or exercise may overestimate their use among cancer survivors. Cancer survivors engage in a wide range of self-management strategies. Encouraging living more consciously and cultivating social relations might be of greater relevance compared with CAM use or exercise.
KeywordsSelf-management strategies Female cancer survivors Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) Conscious living Social relations
Preparation of this article was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation Excellence Initiative Guest Professor Program, Heidelberg University (G.W.), and the German Research Foundation Excellence Initiative International Mobility Program, Heidelberg University (M.S.).
Compliance with ethical standards
The study was approved by the ethics commission of the Faculty of Behavioural and Cultural Studies of Heidelberg University (AZ Siev 2018/2-1).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Brearley SG, Stamataki Z, Addington-Hall J, Foster C, Hodges L, Jarrett N, Richardson A, Scott I, Sharpe M, Stark D, Siller C, Ziegler L, Amir Z (2011) The physical and practical problems experienced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature. Eur J Oncol Nurs 15(3):204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2011.02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2017) United States cancer statistics: 1999–2014 incidence and mortality web-based report. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta (GA) Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs Google Scholar
- 7.Robert Koch-Institut (2015) Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister. In Deutschland EV (Eds.) Krebs in Deutschland 2011/2012 Berlin [cited 2017 November 29th]. Available from: http://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/krebs_in_deutschland_node.html.
- 11.Coffey L, Mooney O, Dunne S, Sharp L, Timmons A, Desmond D, O’Sullivan E, Timon C, Gooberman-Hill R, Gallagher P (2016) Cancer survivors’ perspectives on adjustment-focused self-management interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Cancer Surviv 10(6):1012–1034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0546-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Our Mission [cited 2018 January, 31]. Available from: https://nccih.nih.gov/about/plans/2011/introduction.htm.
- 15.Fox P, Butler M, Coughlan B, Murray M, Boland N, Hanan T, Murphy H, Forrester P, O' Brien M, O' Sullivan N (2013) Using a mixed methods research design to investigate complementary alternative medicine (CAM) use among women with breast cancer in Ireland. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(4):490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Matsuno RK, Pagano IS, Maskarinec G, Issell BF, Gotay CC (2012) Complementary and alternative medicine use and breast cancer prognosis: a pooled analysis of four population-based studies of breast cancer survivors. J Womens Health 21(12):1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.3698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Greenlee H, Kwan ML, Ergas IJ, Sherman KJ, Krathwohl SE, Bonnell C, Lee MM, Kushi LH (2009) Complementary and alternative therapy use before and after breast cancer diagnosis: the Pathways Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(3):653–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-009-0315-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Templeton AJ, Thürlimann B, Baumann M, Mark M, Stoll S, Schwizer M, Dietrich D, Ruhstaller T (2013) Cross-sectional study of self-reported physical activity, eating habits and use of complementary medicine in breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer 13:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Gansler T, Kaw C, Crammer C, Smith T (2008) A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors. Cancer (0008543X) 113(5):1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23659 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Hawkins NA, Smith T, Zhao L, Rodriguez J, Berkowitz Z, Stein KD (2010) Health-related behavior change after cancer: results of the American Cancer Society’s studies of cancer survivors (SCS). J Cancer Surviv 4(1):20–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-009-0104-3 First Author & Affiliation: Hawkins, Nikki ACrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Andrykowski MA, Beacham AO, Schmidt JE, Harper FWK (2006) Application of the theory of planned behavior to understand intentions to engage in physical and psychosocial health behaviors after cancer diagnosis. Psycho-Oncology. 15:759–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1007 First Author & Affiliation: Andrykowski, Michael ACrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Dunne S, Mooney O, Coffey L, Sharp L, Timmons A, Desmond D, Gooberman-Hill R, O'Sullivan E, Keogh I, Timon C, Gallagher P (2017) Self-management strategies used by head and neck cancer survivors following completion of primary treatment: a directed content analysis. Psycho-Oncology. 26(12):2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4447 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Yun YH, Jung JY, Sim JA, Choi H, Lee JM, Noh DY, Han W, Park KJ, Jeong SY, Park JW, Wu HG, Chie EK, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Zo ZI, Kim S, Lee JE, Nam SJ, Lee ES, Oh JH, Kim YW, Kim YT, Shim YM (2015) Patient-reported assessment of self-management strategies of health in cancer patients: development and validation of the Smart Management Strategy for Health Assessment Tool (SAT). Psycho-Oncology. 24(12):1723–1730. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3839 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods 4(3):272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.4.3.272
- 35.Ford JK, MacCallum RC, Tait M (1986) The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: a critical review and analysis. Pers Psychol 39(2):291–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay, CC, & Snyder C (2012) Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Libr, Art. No.: CD007566. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007566.pub2