Advertisement

Enhancing behavioral change among lung cancer survivors participating in a lifestyle risk reduction intervention: a qualitative study

  • Darryl SomayajiEmail author
  • Amanda C. Blok
  • Laura L. Hayman
  • Yolanda Colson
  • Michael Jaklisch
  • Mary E. Cooley
Original Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Early detection and improved treatment have increased lung cancer survival. Lung cancer survivors have more symptom distress and lower function compared with other cancer survivors; however, few interventions are available to improve health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Lifestyle risk reduction interventions have improved HR-QOL in other cancer survivors. The purpose of this study was to explore lung cancer survivor perspectives on making behavioral changes in the context of a lifestyle risk reduction intervention.

Methods

Twenty-two lung cancer survivors participated in interviews after completing the Healthy Directions (HD) intervention. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were gathered through a survey and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

Five main themes were identified: (1) the diagnosis was a motivator for behavior change, (2) participants had to deal with disease consequences, (3) the coach provided guidance, (4) strategies for change were initiated, and (5) social support sustained behavioral changes. Other important subthemes were the coach helped interpret symptoms, which supported self-efficacy and goal setting, and survivors employed self-monitoring behaviors. Several participants found the recommended goals for physical activity were difficult and were discouraged if unable to attain the goal. Findings underscore the need for individualized prescriptions of physical activity, especially for sedentary survivors.

Conclusions

Lung cancer survivors described the benefits of coaching to enhance their engagement in behavioral change. Additional research is needed to validate the benefit of the HD intervention to improve HR-QOL among this vulnerable and understudied group of cancer survivors.

Keywords

Lung cancer Health goals Multiple health behavior change Coaching Health-related quality of life Lifestyle risk reduction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Karen M. Emmons, PhD, for guidance and use of HD intervention materials and Raphael Bueno MD for guidance in implementing the study.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Lung Cancer Research Foundation (MEC), National Institutes of Health, U54 CA156732 (DS), R25T CA172009 (ACB).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors Somayaji, Blok, Hayman, Colson, and Jaklisch have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Dr. Cooley reports grant support from the Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Dr. Cooley has control of all primary data and agrees to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2017) Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67(1):7–30.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS (2015) Survivorship in non–small cell lung cancer: challenges faced and steps forward. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 13(9):1151–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ostroff JS, Krebs P, Coups EJ, Burkhalter JE, Feinstein MB, Steingart RM, Logue AE, Park BJ (2011) Health-related quality of life among early-stage, non-small cell, lung cancer survivors. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 71(1):103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Poghosyan H, Sheldon LK, Leveille SG, Cooley ME (2013) Health-related quality of life after surgical treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 81(1):11–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Cancer Society (2018) Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/survivor-facts-figures.html. Accessed 7 Mar 2018
  6. 6.
    Aggarwal A, Lewison G, Idir S, Peters M, Aldige C, Boerckel W, Boyle P, Trimble EL, Roe P, Sethi T (2016) The state of lung cancer research: a global analysis. J Thorac Oncol 11(7):1040–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mosher CE, Ott MA, Hanna N, Jalal SI, Champion VL (2017) Development of a symptom management intervention: qualitative feedback from advanced lung cancer patients and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 40(1):66–75.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000350 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Given BA, von Eye A, Jones LW, Brown JK (2017) Using perceived self-efficacy to improve fatigue and fatigability in postsurgical lung cancer patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Cancer Nurs 40(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1097/ncc.0000000000000378 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mosher CE, Sloane R, Morey MC, Snyder DC, Cohen HJ, Miller PE, Demark-Wahnefried W (2009) Associations between lifestyle factors and quality of life among older long-term breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 115 (17):4001–4009Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K (2008) Cancer survivors’ adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society’s SCS-II. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26:2198–2204.  https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2007.14.6217 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pelser C, Arem H, Pfeiffer RM, Elena JW, Alfano CM, Hollenbeck AR, Park Y (2014) Prediagnostic lifestyle factors and survival after colon and rectal cancer diagnosis in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health study. Cancer 120(10):1540–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eakin EG, Hayes SC, Haas MR, Reeves MM, Vardy JL, Boyle F, Hiller JE, Mishra GD, Goode AD, Jefford M, Koczwara B, Saunders CM, Demark-Wahnefried W, Courneya KS, Schmitz KH, Girgis A, White K, Chapman K, Boltong AG, Lane K, McKiernan S, Millar L, O’Brien L, Sharplin G, Baldwin P, Robson EL (2015) Healthy living after cancer: a dissemination and implementation study evaluating a telephone-delivered healthy lifestyle program for cancer survivors. BMC Cancer 15(1):992.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2003-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Green AC, Hayman LL, Cooley ME (2015) Multiple health behavior change in adults with or at risk for cancer: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav 39(3):380–394.  https://doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.39.3.11 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffman AJ, Brintnall RA (2017) A Home-based exercise intervention for non–small cell lung cancer patients post-thoracotomy. In: Seminars in oncology nursing, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granger CL, McDonald CF, Berney S, Chao C, Denehy L (2011) Exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity and health related quality of life for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 72(2):139–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Granger CL, Connolly B, Denehy L, Hart N, Antippa P, Lin KY, Parry SM (2017) Understanding factors influencing physical activity and exercise in lung cancer: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 25(3):983–999.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3484-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Temel JS, Greer JA, Goldberg S, Vogel PD, Sullivan M, Pirl WF, Lynch TJ, Christiani DC, Smith MR (2009) A structured exercise program for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4(5):595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31819d18e5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park ER, Japuntich S, Temel J, Lanuti M, Pandiscio J, Hilgenberg J, Davies D, Dresler C, Rigotti NA (2011) A smoking cessation intervention for thoracic surgery and oncology clinics: a pilot trial. J Thorac Oncol 6(6):1059–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e318215a4dc CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Blok AC, Blonquist TM, Nayak MM, Somayaji D, Crouter SE, Hayman LL, Colson YL, Bueno R, Emmons KM, Cooley ME (2018) Feasibility and acceptability of “healthy directions” a lifestyle intervention for adults with lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology 27(1):250–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szabo V, Strang VR (1997) Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Adv Nurs Sci 20(2):66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Emmons KM, Stoddard AM, Fletcher R, Gutheil C, Suarez EG, Lobb R, Weeks J, Bigby JA (2005) Cancer prevention among working class, multiethnic adults: results of the Healthy Directions–Health Centers study. Am J Public Health 95(7):1200–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Emmons KM, Puleo E, Greaney ML, Gillman MW, Bennett GG, Haines J, Sprunck-Harrild K, Viswanath K (2014) A randomized comparative effectiveness study of healthy directions 2—a multiple risk behavior intervention for primary care. Prev Med 64:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas DR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval 27(2):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O, Pölkki T, Utriainen K, Kyngäs H (2014) Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open 4(1):2158244014522633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cope DG (2014) Methods and meanings: credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 1Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W (2008) Critically appraising qualitative research. Bmj 337(aug07_3):a1035–a1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Edhlund B, McDougall A (2017) Nvivo 11 essentials. Lulu. com,Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bederson BB, Shneiderman B, Wattenberg M (2002) Ordered and quantum treemaps: making effective use of 2D space to display hierarchies. AcM Trans Graph 21(4):833–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morse JM (1995) The significance of saturation. Sage Publications Sage CA, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 18(1):59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    McBride CM, Emmons KM, Lipkus IM (2003) Understanding the potential of teachable moments: the case of smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 18(2):156–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lawson PJ, Flocke SA (2009) Teachable moments for health behavior change: a concept analysis. Patient Educ Couns 76(1):25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bluethmann SM, Basen-Engquist K, Vernon SW, Cox M, Gabriel KP, Stansberry SA, Carmack CL, Blalock JA, Demark-Wahnefried W (2015) Grasping the ‘teachable moment’: time since diagnosis, symptom burden and health behaviors in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology 24(10):1250–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Porter LS, Keefe FJ, Garst J, McBride CM, Baucom D (2008) Self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function in patients with lung cancer and their informal caregivers: associations with symptoms and distress. Pain 137(2):306–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lin Y-Y, Liu MF, Tzeng J-I, Lin C-C (2015) Effects of walking on quality of life among lung cancer patients: a longitudinal study. Cancer Nurs 38(4):253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dennis SM, Harris M, Lloyd J, Davies GP, Faruqi N, Zwar N (2013) Do people with existing chronic conditions benefit from telephone coaching? A rapid review. Aust Health Rev 37(3):381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Galantino M, Schmid P, Milos A, Leonard S, Botis S, Dagan C, Mao J (2009) Longitudinal benefits of wellness coaching interventions for cancer survivors. Int J Interdisciplinary Soc Sci 4(10):41–58Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Coups EJ, Park BJ, Feinstein MB, Steingart RM, Egleston BL, Wilson DJ, Ostroff JS (2009) Physical activity among lung cancer survivors: changes across the cancer trajectory and associations with quality of life. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomarkers 18(2):664–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bourke L, Homer K, Thaha M, Steed L, Rosario DJ, Robb K, Saxton J, Taylor S (2014) Interventions to improve exercise behaviour in sedentary people living with and beyond cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer 110(4):831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cadmus-Bertram LA, Marcus BH, Patterson RE, Parker BA, Morey BL (2015) Randomized trial of a Fitbit-based physical activity intervention for women. Am J Prev Med 49(3):414–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hartman SJ, Nelson SH, Weiner LS (2018) Patterns of Fitbit use and activity levels throughout a physical activity intervention: exploratory analysis from a randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6(2)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mercer K, Giangregorio L, Schneider E, Chilana P, Li M, Grindrod K (2016) Acceptance of commercially available wearable activity trackers among adults aged over 50 and with chronic illness: a mixed-methods evaluation. JMIR mHealth uHealth 4(1)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chiauzzi E, Rodarte C, DasMahapatra P (2015) Patient-centered activity monitoring in the self-management of chronic health conditions. BMC Med 13(1):77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Greaney ML, Puleo E, Sprunck-Harrild K, Haines J, Houghton SC, Emmons KM (2017) Social support for changing multiple behaviors: factors associated with seeking support and the impact of offered support. Health Educ Behav:1090198117712333Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stacey FG, James EL, Chapman K, Courneya KS, Lubans DR (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of social cognitive theory-based physical activity and/or nutrition behavior change interventions for cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 9(2):305–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Pinto BM, Floyd A (2008) Theories underlying health promotion interventions among cancer survivors. Semin Oncol Nurs 3. Elsevier:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31:143–164.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Boloker G, Wang C, Zhang J (2018) Updated statistics of lung and bronchus cancer in United States (2018). Journal of thoracic disease 10(3):1158–1161.  https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.03.15 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Alvarez RA, Vasquez E, Mayorga CC, Feaster DJ, Mitrani VB (2006) Increasing minority research participation through community organization outreach. West J Nurs Res 28(5):541–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Vickers SM, Fouad MN (2014) An overview of EMPaCT and fundamental issues affecting minority participation in cancer clinical trials: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual. Cancer 120(S7):1087–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial HospitalUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsBedfordUSA
  3. 3.Graduate School of Nursing and Department of Quantitative Health SciencesUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcesterUSA
  4. 4.College of Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA
  5. 5.Division of Thoracic SurgeryBrigham and Women’s HospitalBostonUSA
  6. 6.Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations