Advertisement

Supportive Care in Cancer

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1755–1763 | Cite as

Comprehensive geriatric assessment and decision-making in older men with incurable but manageable (chronic) cancer

  • Catherine HandforthEmail author
  • Roger Burkinshaw
  • Jenny Freeman
  • Janet E. Brown
  • John A. Snowden
  • Robert E. Coleman
  • Diana M. Greenfield
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

In older cancer patients, treatment decision-making is often complex. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an established tool used in geriatric medicine to identify unmet need requiring intervention. This study aimed to assess whether using a CGA in older male cancer patients with incurable but manageable disease provides information that would alter a cancer clinician’s intended management plan. Acceptability and feasibility were secondary aims.

Methods

Elderly men with incurable but manageable malignancies (advanced prostate cancer and multiple myeloma) who had previously received at least one line of treatment were recruited from hospital outpatient clinics. A CGA was undertaken. Additional parameters measuring pain, fatigue and disease-specific concerns were also recorded, at the recommendation of patient involvement groups. Results were made available to clinicians. Patient and clinician acceptability and changes in subsequent management were recorded.

Results

Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median ages were 70.8 years and 74 years for myeloma and prostate respectively. Most identified concerns are related to disease-specific concerns (93%), pain (91%), frailty (57%) and nutrition (52%). Results altered the clinician’s oncological management plan in nine cases only. Patients found the format and content of CGA acceptable.

Conclusions

Many unmet needs were identified in this population of elderly men with manageable but non curable cancer which led to supportive care referrals and interventions. The CGA, however, did not result in significant changes in clinical oncology treatment plans for the majority of patients. The application of the CGA and other assessments was viewed positively by participants and can feasibly be undertaken in the outpatient oncology setting.

Keywords

Comprehensive geriatric assessment Advanced prostate cancer Multiple myeloma 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge the following people who recruited patients to the study and completed clinician evaluation forms: Dr. Andy Chantry (Consultant Haematologist, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust); Dr. Yousef Ezaydi (Associate specialist, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust) and Dr. Catherine Ferguson (Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust). We also wish to acknowledge Dr. Jane Fearnside (Research Fellow, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield) for the early protocol development; Andrea Foster (Clinical Nurse Specialist, Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Foundation Trust) for the clinical support and potential participant selection; Rachael Selby (Senior Research Sister, Haematology, University of Sheffield) for the logistical support, clinical advice and potential participant selection; and the research staff at the Cancer Clinical Trials Centre, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, in particular Dr. Janet Horsman for the support in database development. We particularly thank all the patients who took part in this study.

Funding information

This study was funded by a research award from the Sheffield Hospitals Charity. Dr. Catherine Handforth has received funding from Weston Park Hospital Cancer Charity, and Prof John Snowden has received funding from the Sheffield Hospitals Charity.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    CRUK. Cancer incidence by age: Cancer Research UK. Accessed 23rd April 2017. Available from: http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age
  2. 2.
    Turner NJ, Haward RA, Mulley GP, Selby PJ (1999) Cancer in old age—is it inadequately investigated and treated? BMJ 319:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Research MC. Age old excuse: the under-treatment of older cancer patients [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.macmillan.org.uk/documents/getinvolved/campaigns/ageoldexcuse/ageoldexcusereport-macmillancancersupport.pdf
  4. 4.
    Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJCCA (1999) Under-representation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer treatment trials. N Engl J Med 341:2061–2067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, Nur U, Tracey E, Coory M, Hatcher J, McGahan C, Turner D, Marrett L, Gjerstorff ML, Johannesen TB, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Lawrence G, Meechan D, Morris EJ, Middleton R, Steward J, Richards MA (2011) Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 377:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D et al (2014) Cancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tudiver FTY (1999) Why don’t men seek help? Family physicians’ perspectives on help-seeking behavior in men. J Fam Pract 48(1):47–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Banks I (2001) No man’s land: men, illness, and the NHS. BMJ 323:1058–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    White AK, Thomson CS, Forman D, Meryn S (2010) Men’s health and the excess burden of cancer in men. Eur Urol Suppl 9(3):467–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    (NCRI) NCRI. Cancer research spend in the UK 2002–2011: an overview of research funded by NCRI partners. 2012. Available from: http://www.ncri.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/2013-NCRI-cancer-research-spend-Uk-2002-2011.pdf
  11. 11.
    Rubenstein LZ, Stuck AE, Siu AL et al (1991) Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: overview of the evidence. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(9 (part 2)):S17–S18Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Extermann M, Aapro M, Bernabei R, Cohen HJ, Droz JP, Lichtman S et al (2005) Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG). Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 55:241–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ellis G, Whitehead MA, O’Neill D, Langhorne P, Robinson D (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 27(343):d6553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, et al. International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus on Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(24)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet [Internet] 2013 [cited 2014 Mar 21];381(9868):752–62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395245
  16. 16.
    Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale http://camapcanada.ca/Frailtyscale.pdf. Acccessed 20th April 2018
  17. 17.
    Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Mateos MV, Larocca A, Facon T, Kumar SK, Offidani M, McCarthy P, Evangelista A, Lonial S, Zweegman S, Musto P, Terpos E, Belch A, Hajek R, Ludwig H, Stewart AK, Moreau P, Anderson K, Einsele H, Durie BGM, Dimopoulos MA, Landgren O, San Miguel JF, Richardson P, Sonneveld P, Rajkumar SV (2015) Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: An International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood 125(13):2068–2074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 56(M1):46–56Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rockwood KMA (2011) Frailty defined by deficit accumulation and geriatric medicine defined by frailty. Clin Geriatr Med 27(1):17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL (1991) The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 32(6):705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chow E, Bottomley A (2009) Understanding the EORTC QLQ-BM22, the module for patients with bone metastases. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 9(5):461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chow E, Nguyen J, Zhang L, Tseng LM, Hou MF, Fairchild A, Vassiliou V, Jesus-Garcia R, Alm el-Din MA, Kumar A, Forges F, Chie WC, Bottomley A, On behalf of the European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group (2012) International field testing of the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-BM22 module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with bone metastases. Cancer 118(5):1457–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Puts MTE, Hardt J, Monette J, Girre V, Springall E, Alibhai SMH (2012) Use of geriatric assessment for older adults in the oncology setting: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104(15):1133–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Handforth C, Clegg A, Young C et al (2014) The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 2014:1–11Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hamaker ME, Schiphorst AH, Ten Bokkel HD, Schaar C, van Munster BC (2013) The effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions for older cancer patients - a systematic review. Acta Oncol 2013:1–8Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chaibi P, Magné N, Breton S et al (2011) Influence of geriatric consultation with comprehensive geriatric assessment on final therapeutic decision in elderly cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 79(3):302–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kalsi T, Payne S, Brodie H, Mansi J, Wang Y, Harari D (2013) Are the UK oncology trainees adequately informed about the needs of older people with cancer. Br J Cancer 108(10):1936–1941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wildiers H, Heeren P, Puts M, Topinkova E, Janssen-Heijnen MLG, Extermann M, Falandry C, Artz A, Brain E, Colloca G, Flamaing J, Karnakis T, Kenis C, Audisio RA, Mohile S, Repetto L, van Leeuwen B, Milisen K, Hurria A (2014) International society of geriatric oncology consensus on geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 32(24):2595–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Snowden JA, Greenfield DM, Bird JM, Boland E, Bowcock S, Fisher A, Low E, Morris M, Yong K, Pratt G, the UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF) and the British Society for Haematology (BSH) (2017) Guidelines for screening and management of late and long-term consequences of myeloma and its treatment. Br J Haematol 176(6):888–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    To THM, Okera M, Prouse J, Prowse RJ, Singhal N (2010) Infancy of an Australian geriatric oncology program-characteristics of the first 200 patients. J Geriatr Oncol 1(2):81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ingram SS, Seo PH, Martell RE, Clipp EC, Doyle ME, Montana GS, Cohen HJ (2002) Comprehensive assessment of the elderly cancer patient: the feasibility of self-report methodology. J Clin Oncol 20(3):770–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hurria A, Gupta S, Zauderer M, Zuckerman EL, Cohen HJ, Muss H, Rodin M, Panageas KS, Holland JC, Saltz L, Kris MG, Noy A, Gomez J, Jakubowski A, Hudis C, Kornblith AB (2005) Developing a cancer-specific geriatric assessment - a feasibility study. Cancer 104(9):1998–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hurria A, Lichtman SM, Gardes J, Li D, Limaye S, Patil S, Zuckerman E, Tew W, Hamlin P, Abou-Alfa GK, Lachs M, Kelly E (2007) Identifying vulnerable older adults with cancer: integrating geriatric assessment into oncology practice. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(10):1604–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Department of Health U. Cancer services coming of age:learning from the improving cancer treatment assessment and support for older people project 2012. Available from: http://www.macmillan.org.uk/documents/aboutus/health_professionals/olderpeoplesproject/cancerservicescomingofage.pdf
  36. 36.
    Macmillan Cancer Support: Expert Reference Group for the Older Person with Cancer. Older people living with cancer: designing the future health care workforce 2016. Available from: http://www.macmillan.org.uk/assets/workforce-report.pdf
  37. 37.
    Wildiers H, Brain E, Penninckx B, Ring A, Repetto L, Soubeyran P, Monfardini S, Aapro M, Wedding U (2012) The EORTC Cancer in the Elderly Task Force, a Protostar for EORTC’s future. Eur J Cancer Suppl 10(1):34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kalsi T, Harari D. UK assessment methods and services for older people with cancer: a national survey. In: 16th Annual Conference of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), Milan, Italy. 2016Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Monfardini S, Aapro MS, Bennett JM, Mori M, Regenstreif D, Rodin M, Stein B, Zulian GB, Droz JP (2007) Organization of the clinical activity of geriatric oncology: report of a SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) task force. Crit Rev Oncol 62(1):62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Droz J-P, Aapro M, Balducci L, Boyle H, van den Broeck T, Cathcart P, Dickinson L, Efstathiou E, Emberton M, Fitzpatrick JM, Heidenreich A, Hughes S, Joniau S, Kattan M, Mottet N, Oudard S, Payne H, Saad F, Sugihara T (2014) Management of prostate cancer in older patients: updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology. Lancet Oncol 15(9):e404–e414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.Weston Park HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
  3. 3.Royal Hallamshire HospitalSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations