A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
- 130 Downloads
The degree to which peer support is used and accepted as a supportive care approach by women with breast cancer is unclear. We examine peer support use across three major modalities (i.e. support groups, online platforms, one-on-one) and identify enablers and barriers to peer support using the beliefs framework of the theory of planned behaviour. A population-based sample of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 3105) who were on average 54.08 weeks since diagnosis completed mailed surveys at baseline measuring beliefs about peer support and intention. Peer support use was measured via telephone interview at baseline and prospectively at 12-month follow-up (n = 2780). In all, 37% of women had used at least one peer support service since diagnosis (support group = 20%, online = 18%, one-on-one = 10%). A path analysis examined what beliefs enabled or acted as barriers to peer support use at follow-up adjusting for past behaviour (i.e. baseline use), sociodemographic characteristics, and treatment. In order of relative strength, enablers included beliefs that peer support is an outlet for honest expression of feelings (β = .35), a source of empathy (β = .30), approved by doctors (β = .07), and approved by family/partner (β = .04). Barriers were beliefs that it encourages dwelling about breast cancer (β = − .06) and involves exposure to negative stories about this disease (β = − .04). Strategies which communicate the potential emotional support benefits of a shared illness experience and social approval by others, particularly the medical profession, may help to promote acceptance of peer support and encourage service uptake in breast cancer.
KeywordsBreast cancer Peer support Psychosocial care
The authors wish to thank Carmen Connell and Carla Shield for research support.
Data for this study was collected as part of a research project on breast cancer outcomes funded by Cancer Australia (grant number 1006339). Philippa Youl is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship (#1054038).
Compliance with ethical standards
The authors have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review data if requested.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Brédart A, Merdy O, Sigal-Zafrani B, Fiszer C, Dolbeault S, Hardouin JB (2016) Identifying trajectory clusters in breast cancer survivors’ supportive care needs, psychosocial difficulties, and resources from the completion of primary treatment to 8 months later. Support Care Cancer 24(1):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2799-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.McCaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I (2017) Online support groups for women with breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011652.pub2
- 8.Kowalski C, Weber R, Jung J, Ansmann L, Pfaff H (2012) In-house information about and contact with self-help groups in breast cancer patients: associated with patient and hospital characteristics? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 21(2):205–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01309.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Gray R, Fitch M, Davis C, Phillips C (1997) A qualitative study of breast cancer self-help groups. Psycho-Oncology 6(4):279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199712)6:4<279::AID-PON280>3.0.CO;2-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Im EO, Chee W, Lim HJ, Liu Y, Guevara E, Kim KS (2007) Patients' attitudes toward internet cancer support groups. Oncol Nurs Forum 34(3):705–712. https://doi.org/10.1188/07.ONF.705-71210.1188/07.ONF.705-712 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2010) Mplus User’s Guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- 32.Australia C (2014) Clinical guidance for responding to suffering in adults with cancer. Cancer Australia, NSW, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- 33.National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, CamperdownGoogle Scholar
- 37.Cameron LD, Booth RJ, Schlatter M, Ziginskas D, Harman JE, Benson SR (2005) Cognitive and affective determinants of decisions to attend a group psychosocial support program for women with breast cancer. Psychosom Med 67(4):584–589. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000170834.54970.f5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar