Skip to main content
Log in

Examining trajectories of anxiety in men with prostate cancer faced with complex treatment decisions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine changes in anxiety over time (trajectories) in men with prostate cancer faced with a decision to participate in a clinical trial and to identify demographic and study variables that predict these trajectories.

Methods

Our data come from a larger study examining the efficacy of a decision aid on decisional conflict in men with prostate cancer who were deciding whether to participate in a prostate cancer clinical trial. We used latent growth mixture models to identify ‘classes’ (i.e. groups) of participants with different trajectories of anxiety, as assessed by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state scale, and binary logistic regression to determine predictors of anxiety ‘class’.

Results

In 128 men with prostate cancer (mean age = 63), growth mixture modelling identified two classes defined by different anxiety trajectories. One class (n = 27) started with a higher mean anxiety score and did not change over time (stable high), whereas the second class (n = 101) started with lower anxiety and significantly reduced over time (low and recovering). None of the demographic and study variables (including age, education, marital status, and decision to join the trial) was predictive of anxiety class.

Conclusions

Men treated for prostate cancer who have high levels of anxiety after surgery may continue to have persistent high anxiety levels which do not reduce naturally over time. Patient or disease characteristics do not appear to predict anxiety. It is important, therefore, to monitor for anxiety in this population and refer for psychological interventions where required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balderson N, Towell T (2003) The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in men with prostate cancer who are seeking support. Br J Health Psychol 8:125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Steginga SK et al (2004) Prospective study of men’s psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancer. Urology 63(4):751–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Watts S et al (2013) Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates. BMJ Open 4:3

    Google Scholar 

  4. Korfage IJ et al (2006) Anxiety and depression after prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment: 5-year follow-up. Br J Cancer 94(8):1093–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunn LB et al (2012) Trajectories of anxiety in oncology patients and family caregivers during and after radiation therapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lam WWT et al (2010) Trajectories of psychological distress among Chinese women diagnosed with breast cancer. Psychooncology 19:1044–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lam WWT, Ye M, Fielding R (2013) Trajectories of quality of life among Chinese patients diagnosed with nasopharyngeal cancer. PLoS One 7(9):e440022

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parker PA et al (2016) Relationship between illness uncertainty, anxiety, fear of progression and quality of life in men with favourable-risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. BJU Int 117(3):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dieperink KB et al (2017) Male coping through a long-term cancer trajectory. Secondary outcomes from a RTC examining the effect of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (RePCa) among radiated men with prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 56(2):254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale W et al (2005) The role of anxiety in prostate carcinoma. Cancer 104(3):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearse M et al (2014) A phase III trial to investigate the timing of radiotherapy for prostate cancer with high-risk features: background and rationale of the radiotherapy—Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) trial. BJU Int 113:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sundaresan P et al (2017) A randomised controlled trial evaluating the utility of a patient decision aid to improve clinical trial (RAVES 08.03) related decision-making. Radiother Oncol 125(1):124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spielberger CD et al (1983) Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA (2006) An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  15. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2011) Mplus User's Guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén

  16. Butow P et al (2015) Clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: Australian guidelines. Psycho-Oncology 24(9):987–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoja L et al (2016) Does clinical trial participation improve outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer? ESMO Open 1(4):e000057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chambers SK et al (2014) The validity of the distress thermometer in prostate cancer populations: the distress thermometer in prostate cancer. Psychooncology 23(2):195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (Young Investigator Grant No. YI 0112) and Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists Research Grant awarded to PS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel S. J. Costa.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval was obtained from the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee and from site-specific research governance bodies at each participating site (HREC/11/RPAH/433).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Costa, D.S.J., Sundaresan, P., Ager, B. et al. Examining trajectories of anxiety in men with prostate cancer faced with complex treatment decisions. Support Care Cancer 27, 567–571 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4351-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4351-6

Keywords

Navigation