Correlates of anxiety and depression symptoms among patients and their family caregivers prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for hematological malignancies
- 84 Downloads
Given the complexities and risks of allogeneic HCT, patients and their family caregivers may experience elevated psychological distress, including symptoms of anxiety and depression, in anticipation of the procedure. Patients and caregivers also bring with them their pre-HCT experiences of diagnosis, prior treatment, and associated burdens, thus potentially compounding their acute distress. Identification of clinical, psychosocial, and sociodemographic factors related to pre-HCT distress would allow targeting of patients and caregivers who may require assistance during the HCT process.
Consecutive patients (n = 111) and their caregivers (n = 110) completed measures of anxiety, depression, cancer distress, perceived threat, perceived control, self-efficacy, relationship quality, and physical quality of life in the week before HCT. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with patient and caregiver anxiety or depression, including disease type, donor type, and patient and caregiver sociodemographic, health-related, and psychosocial factors.
Family caregivers had higher levels of anxiety and depression symptoms than patients. Thirty percent of caregivers vs. 17% of patients met criteria for clinically significant anxiety and a lesser amount (5% for both) met criteria for clinically significant depression. Patient anxiety was related to younger age (b = − 0.22, p = 0.005) and greater cancer-related distress (b = 0.59, p < 0.001), while caregiver anxiety was related to lower self-efficacy (b = − 0.19, p = 0.011) and greater cancer-related distress (b = 0.58, p < 0.001). Similarly, patient depression was related to lower perceived control (b = − 0.17, p = 0.050), greater cancer-related distress (b = 0.34, p = 0.005), and lower physical functioning (b = − 0.26, p = 0.008), while caregiver depression was related to greater cancer-related distress (b = 0.46, p < 0.001).
Family caregivers may be more emotionally vulnerable than patients before HCT and in need of additional assistance. Cancer-related distress was the strongest correlate of anxiety and depression in both patients and caregivers, suggesting that distress related to their cancer experience and its consequences plays a major role in their emotional functioning prior to HCT.
KeywordsAnxiety Depression Family caregiver Hematological malignancies Transplantation
This study was supported by grants K23CA149082 and P30CA047904 from the National Cancer Institute.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This research was conducted in compliance with ethical standards.
- 1.Majhail NS, Farnia SH, Carpenter PA, Champlin RE, Crawford S, Marks DI, Omel JL, Orchard PJ, Palmer J, Saber W, Savani BN, Veys PA, Bredeson CN, Giralt SA, LeMaistre CF (2015) Indications for autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: guidelines from the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 21(11):1863–1869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) (2015) Patient Care Guidelines: Allogeneic transplant: How to plan and what to expect. http://www.marrow.org
- 14.Sarkar S, Scherwath A, Schirmer L, Schulz-Kindermann F, Neumann K, Kruse M, Dinkel A, Kunze S, Balck F, Kröger N, Koch U, Mehnert A (2014) Fear of recurrence and its impact on quality of life in patients with hematological cancers in the course of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 49(9):1217–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ferraro KF, Su Y (1999) Financial strain, social relations, and psychological distress among older people: a cross-cultural analysis. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 54((1):S3–S15Google Scholar
- 21.Syrjala K (2005) The Cancer and Treatment Distress Scale (CTXD). Scoring manual obtained from the authorGoogle Scholar
- 25.Spanier GB (1978) Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for asessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 38(1):15–28Google Scholar
- 32.Jerusalem RSM (1995) Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman SWJ, Johnston M (eds) Measures in health psychology: a user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor, pp 35–37Google Scholar
- 34.Chan KS, Aronson Friedman L, Bienvenu OJ, Dinglas VD, Cuthbertson BH, Porter R, Jones C, Hopkins RO, Needham DM (2016) Distribution-based estimates of minimal important difference for hospital anxiety and depression scale and impact of event scale-revised in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 42:32–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Wood WA, le-Rademacher J, Syrjala KL, Jim H, Jacobsen PB, Knight JM, Abidi MH, Wingard JR, Majhail NS, Geller NL, Rizzo JD, Fei M, Wu J, Horowitz MM, Lee SJ (2016) Patient-reported physical functioning predicts the success of hematopoietic cell transplantation (BMT CTN 0902). Cancer 122(1):91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar