The prevalence and determinants of return to work in head and neck cancer survivors
To determine the prevalence of and factors associated with the reduction or complete cessation of employment following treatment in head and neck cancer survivors.
This cross-sectional study was conducted among head and neck cancer survivors visiting outpatient clinics at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre over a period of 18 months. Participants at any point along their survivorship course completed a survey that included demographic information, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Work Status Questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck (FACT-HN), the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck (MDASI-HN), the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs Measure (CaSUN), and the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L utility scale.
Among 130 participants, 64 were employed at diagnosis. At the time of study, 31 (48%) had reduced their work, among whom, 21 (32.8%) had not returned to work at all following treatment. Pre-treatment employment status, cancer-related symptoms, quality of life, and health utility were associated with employment outcomes.
A high proportion of head and neck cancer survivors reduced their work capacity and many did not return following cancer treatment. Further research is needed to understand the barriers to work return in these survivors and to explore strategies to encourage resumption of employment and employment satisfaction.
KeywordsSurvivorship Return to work Insurance Unemployment Head and neck neoplasms
The MDASI-HN, FACT-HN, EQ-5D, and CaSUN were used with permission. This work was supported by the Princess Margaret Foundation Discovery fund.
This study was funded by the Princess Margaret Cancer Center Discovery Grant.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No financial relationship exists with the organization that sponsored this research.
We have full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review the data if requested.
Meredith Giuliani declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Janet Papadakos declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Michaela Broadhurst declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Jennifer Jones declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Maurene McQuestion declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Lisa W Le declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Lydia Beck declares that she has no conflict of interest.
John Waldron declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Jolie Ringash declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals: all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Princess Margaret Cancer Center institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Results focusing on unmet needs from the overall cohort have been previously published (Giuliani, M. McQuestion, M. Jones, J. Papadakos, J. Le, LW. Alkazaz, N. Cheng, T. Waldron, J. Catton, P. Ringash, J. Prevalence and nature of survivorship needs in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38(7): 1097-1103.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 2.Papadakos JM, McQuestion M, Gokhale A (2017) Informational Needs of Head and Neck Cancer Patients. J Cancer Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1176-9
- 7.Ringash J (2014) Facing head and neck cancer deaths head on: lessons for survival. J Cancer Educ 120(10):1446–1449Google Scholar
- 17.Taylor JC, Terrell JE, Ronis DL, Fowler KE, Bishop C, Lambert MT, Myers LL, Duffy SA, Bradford CR, Chepeha DB, Hogikyan ND, Prince ME, Teknos TN, Wolf GT, University of Michigan Head and Neck Cancer Team (2004) Disability in patients with head and neck Cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(6):764–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. Programs and Resources to Facilitate Return to Work for People with Cancer or Other Chronic Diseases: Environmental Scan. Cancer Journey Advisory Group, April 2012Google Scholar
- 23.National Cancer Institute (2017) D.o.C.C.P.S. In: Definitions - Office of Cancer SurvivorshipGoogle Scholar
- 25.Rosenthal DI, Mendoza TR, Chambers MS, Asper JA, Gning I, Kies MS, Weber RS, Lewin JS, Garden AS, Ang KK, S. Wang X, Cleeland CS (2007) Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head Neck 29(10):923–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Demographic Work Status Questionnaire. Available from: https://www.rtog.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=lbxiSb0V2LA%3D&tabid=40
- 30.Wellspring Returning to Work Program Available from: https://wellspring.ca/downtown-toronto/programs/all-programs/returning-to-work/
- 31.Terrell JE, Nanavati K, Esclamado RM, Bradford CR, Wolf GT (1999) Health impact of head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120(6):852–859Google Scholar
- 32.Morrison T, Thomas R, Guitard P (2015) Physicians’ perspectives on cancer survivors’ work integration issues. Can Fam Physician:e36–e42Google Scholar