Disparities in health-related quality of life in women undergoing treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: the role of individual-level and contextual social determinants
Social determinants may influence health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among women with ovarian cancer, potentially creating disparities in clinical outcomes. We investigated the relationship between HRQOL and social determinants of health, including travel distance to access cancer care and health insurance type, among women participating in a randomized trial of primary adjuvant treatment for advanced ovarian cancer.
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire captured HRQOL (physical well-being, functional well-being, ovarian-specific, and trial outcome index [TOI]) prior to chemotherapy (baseline), during the trial, and 84 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy for women with advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. We constructed bivariate and multivariable linear mixed effects models examining the associations of social determinants of health (individual-level and contextual factors) with HRQOL scores at 84 weeks, clustering participants (n = 993) within treatment centers, and Census regions and controlling for baseline HRQOL.
Most individual-level (race, age, cancer stage, adverse events) and contextual (travel distance to treatment center, community socioeconomic status) factors were not statistically significantly associated with HRQOL. Compared to participants with private health insurance, other participants had lower mean HRQOL (physical well-being: public insurance, − 1.00 (standard error[SE] = 0.49) points, uninsured, − 1.93 (SE = 0.63) points; functional well-being: public, − 1.29 (SE = 0.59), uninsured, − 1.98 (SE = 0.76); ovarian cancer-specific: public, − 1.60 (SE = 0.59), uninsured, − 1.66 (SE = 0.75); TOI: public, − 3.81 (SE = 1.46), uninsured, − 5.51 (SE = 1.86); all p < .05).
Private health insurance was associated with improved HRQOL at the completion of treatment for advanced stage ovarian cancer. Implications of health insurance on HRQOL should be further investigated, particularly among women with ovarian cancer who receive standard of care treatment.
KeywordsHealth-related quality of life Social determinants of health Travel distance Health insurance Community health Ovarian cancer
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This manuscript was prepared or accomplished by the authors in their personal capacity. The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ own and do not reflect the view of the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the US government. The statements presented in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), its Board of Governors, or its Methodology Committee. Original data are maintained by NRG Oncology.
- 5.Lutgendorf SK, Shinn E, Carter J, Leighton S, Baggerly K, Guindani M, Fellman B, Matzo M, Slavich GM, Goodman MT, Tew W, Lester J, Moore KM, Karlan BY, Levine DA, Sood AK (2017) Quality of life among long-term survivors of advanced stage ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional approach. Gynecol Oncol 146:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Zeng C, Wen W, Morgans AK, Pao W, Shu X-O, Zheng W (2015) Disparities by race, age, and sex in the improvement of survival for major cancers: results from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program in the United States, 1990 to 2010. JAMA Oncol 1:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.U.S. Census Bureau (2018) American FactFinder. https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml. Accessed 2017
- 24.Monk BJ, Huang HQ, Burger RA, Mannel RS, Homesley HD, Fowler J, Greer BE, Boente M, Liang SX, Wenzel L (2013) Patient reported outcomes of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of bevacizumab in the front-line treatment of ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 128:573–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Soobader M-J, Subramanian S, Carson R (2002) Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Epidemiol 156:471–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Phippen N, Secord A, Wolf S, Samsa G, Davidson B, Abernethy A et al (2017) Quality of life is significantly associated with survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: an ancillary data analysis of the NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG-0218) study. Gynecol Oncol 147:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Eom CS, Shin DW, Kim SY, Yang HK, Jo HS, Kweon SS, Kang YS, Kim JH, Cho BL, Park JH (2013) Impact of perceived social support on the mental health and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: results from a nationwide, multicenter survey in South Korea. Psycho-Oncology 22:1283–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar