The effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy for psychological distress among Chinese parents of children with a cancer diagnosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Given the critical role of parental care for pediatric cancer patients, this pilot study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of a hospital-based solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT) intervention for reducing psychological distress among parents of pediatric cancer patients in China. Differences between treatment and active control (AC) groups were assessed on dimensions of psychological distress. Parents’ level of hope was also assessed.
Participants (N = 44) were randomly assigned to SFBT or AC. Parents received four sessions of SFBT twice a week delivered by graduate-level hospital social workers. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured change in distress (depression, anxiety, and somatization symptoms) of parents as well as their level of hope.
Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) indicated the SFBT group had better outcomes than the AC group on overall distress of somatic, anxiety, depression symptoms and level of hope. Within- and between-group treatment effects reported significantly greater effect of the SFBT group than of the AC group.
Considering the inherent limits of a pilot feasibility study, results suggest that SFBT is a feasible, culturally compatible, and promising intervention for alleviating distress among Chinese parents of children with cancer. Additional comprehensive trials are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.
SFBT may be beneficial for improving the critical support systems of parents of pediatric cancer patients. Thus, SFBT may have the potential to enhance children’s well-being during cancer treatment and recovery.
KeywordsSolution-focused brief therapy Pediatric oncology Psychological distress Parents
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was approved by the medical ethics review board at Shanghai Children’s Medical Center affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University Medical School. The corresponding author has full access to the raw data but needs to receive permission from the hospital’s IRB to gain full control of the data. Medical ethics review board of the hospital requires separate application to submit raw data to any third-party agency/institution. Therefore, the author will not be able to submit the data until it is approved by the hospital’s IRB.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Rodriguez-Galindo C, Friedrich P, Alcasabas P, Antillon F, Banavali S, Castillo L, Israels T, Jeha S, Harif M, Sullivan MJ, Quah TC, Patte C, Pui CH, Barr R, Gross T (2015) Toward the cure of all children with cancer through collaborative efforts: pediatric oncology as a global challenge. J Clin Oncol 33(27):3065–3073. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.60.6376 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 2.Sullivan R, Kowalczyk JR, Agarwal B, Ladenstein R, Fitzgerald E, Barr R, Steliarova-Foucher E, Magrath I, Howard SC, Kruger M, Valsecchi MG, Biondi A, Grundy P, Smith MA, Adamson P, Vassal G, Pritchard-Jones K (2013) New policies to address the global burden of childhood cancers. Lancet Oncol 14(3):e125–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70007-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Gupta S, Rivera-Luna R, Ribeiro RC, Howard SC (2014) Pediatric oncology as the next global child health priority: the need for national childhood cancer strategies in low- and middle-income countries. PLoS Med 11(6):e1001656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001656 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 14.Colletti CJM, Wolfe-Christensen C, Carpentier MY, Page MC, McNall-Knapp RY, Meyer WH, Chaney JM, Mullins LL (2008) The relationship of parental overprotection, perceived vulnerability, and parenting stress to behavioral, emotional, and social adjustment in children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 51(2):269–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.21577 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Farran JC, Herth AK, Popovich JM (1995) Hope and hopelessness: critical clinical construct. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 27.Franklin C, Trepper TS, Gingerich WJ, McCollum EE (2012) Solution-focused brief therapy: a handbook of evidence-based practice. Solut Br Ther A Handb evidence-based Pract. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc9&NEWS=N&AN=2011-19840-000
- 29.Kim J, Understanding FC (2015) Emotional change in solution-focused brief therapy: facilitating positive emotions. Best Pract Ment Health 11(1):25–41 http://search.proquest.com.access.library.unisa.edu.au/docview/1679871138/fulltext?accountid=14649 Google Scholar
- 31.Burns K (2016) Focus on solutions: a health professional’s guide, 2nd edn. Solutions Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 32.Derogatis L (2001) Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18. Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual. NCS:Pearson, Inc., MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
- 35.Herth K (1992) Abbreviated instrument to measure hope: development and psychometric evaluation. J Adv Nurs 17(10):1251–1259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01843.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Bavelas J, de Jong P, Franklin C, et al. (2013) Solution focused therapy treatment manual for working with individuals. Solut Focus Br Ther Assoc :40. http://www.sfbta.org/researchDownloads.html
- 39.Cooper, Harris L V, Valentine, et al (2009) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Vol 3.; . http://muse.jhu.edu/.%5Cnhttp://muse.jhu.edu/books/9781610441384Google Scholar